2010/8/7 Ivan Voras :
> 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Smørgrav :
>> Garrett Cooper writes:
>>> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
>>> > Perhaps. I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
>>> > the list archives (other than me announcing the change in response to a
>>> > bug report), but ther
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:57:44AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to help users having 4k sector drives which the system
> recognizes as 512 byte sector drives, I'm proposing a patch to glabel
> which enables it to use a forced sector size for its native-labeled
> providers. It is nat
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:02:17PM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> > So why do you want to obfuscate glabel with it? For people to start
> > depend on it? Once we start supporting 4kB sectors what do we do with
> > such a change? Remove it and decrease ver
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav :
> > Garrett Cooper writes:
> >> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes:
> >> > Perhaps. ??I don't remember all the details; I can't find a discussion in
> >> > the list archives (other than me announcing the chang
On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 02:57:20PM +0200, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras wrote:
> > I'd like to hear comments from the wider audience. In respect with your
> > comment, I will compromise: as 4k sector drives have become available
> > over the counter more than 6
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 8.8.2010 12:30, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 03:57:44AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> In order to help users having 4k sector drives which the system
>>> recognizes as 512 byte sector drives, I'm proposing a p
2010/8/4 :
> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 10:08:22 am John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:39:02 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
>>> > We've seen a few instances at work where witness_warn() in ast()
>>> > indicates the sched lock is
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Attilio Rao wrote:
> 2010/8/4 :
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 2:31 PM, John Baldwin wrote:
>>> On Friday, July 30, 2010 10:08:22 am John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, July 29, 2010 7:39:02 pm m...@freebsd.org wrote:
> We've seen a few instances at work where
In message: <20100808130624.gb40...@sandvine.com>
Ed Maste writes:
: On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
:
: > 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav :
: > > Garrett Cooper writes:
: > >> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav writes:
: > >> > Perhaps. ??I don't remember all the detail
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 21:08, Ivan Voras wrote:
> On 8.8.2010 14:57, Marius Nünnerich wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 14:02, Ivan Voras wrote:
>
> This mechanism is a band-aid until there's a better way of dealing
> with 4k drives.
>
>> I do not like this at all. Even if it's just for th
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 11:14 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <20100808130624.gb40...@sandvine.com>
> Ed Maste writes:
> : On Sun, Aug 08, 2010 at 01:30:19AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote:
> :
> : > 2010/8/8 Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav :
> : > > Garrett Cooper writes:
> : > >> Dag-Erling Sm
> I have a similar problem.
>
> I have a NFS server (8.0 upgraded a couple times since Feb 2010) that
> locks up
> and requires a reboot.
>
> The clients are busy vm's from VMWare ESXi using the NFS server for
> vmdk virtual
> disk storage.
>
> The ESXi reports nfs server inactive and all the vm
12 matches
Mail list logo
