On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Robert N. M. Watson wrote:
> Something that's always worried me about the Mac OS X and Linux EA APIs
> is the namespace issue: in FreeBSD, we have an explicit enumeration of
> namespaces reflected in an argument to the system calls -- in our case,
> an int, but you could ima
On 5 Jul 2010, at 10:25, James Morris wrote:
>> I'm happy to help contribute to the writing on an Internet Draft and/or
>> RFC -- the lack of NFS support for EAs (and the EA vs. file fork
>> confusion) have long caused me frustration, and with systems like
>> SELinux, our various MAC policies,
Not related to your problem, but related to $SUBJECT: make sure to use
-P in LFLAGS so your lex-generated symbols don't conflict
with those present in applications that use your library, or in other
libraries those applications may use.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - d...@des.no
___
Hi Hackers,
I've just started learning implementation of threads in FreeBSD-CURRENT.
exctags found three different implementations of pthread_create
function - libc_r, libkse and libthr:
# pri kind tag file
1 F f_pthread_create lib/libc_r/uthread/uthread_create.c
on 02/07/2010 11:29 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following:
> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
>> Proposed patch skips zero sized sections without going into trouble of
>> allocating section entry (progtab), doing zero-sized memory allocs and
>> copies.
>> I observe that sometimes z
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
on 02/07/2010 11:29 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following:
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Hey,
Proposed patch skips zero sized sections without going into trouble of
allocating section entry (progtab), doing zero-sized memory allocs and
copies.
I
on 05/07/2010 20:12 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following:
> On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
>> on 02/07/2010 11:29 Bjoern A. Zeeb said the following:
>>> On Fri, 25 Jun 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>>
>>> Hey,
>>>
Proposed patch skips zero sized sections without going into trouble of
>>>
On 7/5/10 10:12 AM, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Andriy Gapon wrote:
[...]
The same applies to VIMAGE btw. Same technique.
or the proposed per-vimage AND per-CPU zone (to allow pcpu stats in a
vimage..).. which degenerates to just more pcpu stuff if vimage is not
enabled.
Hi Garret,
On Wed, 30 Jun 2010, Garrett Cooper wrote:
GC>I currently set:
GC>
GC>.POSIX=
I think this should be actually a target (the first one in the Makefile):
.POSIX:
GC>
GC>In a Makefile thinking that it would enable only POSIX
GC>functionality, and was fidgeting around with the M
On 06/07/2010, at 5:32, Christopher Bowman wrote:
> If I could, let me ask another question. My device could potential have up
> to 6 BARs, that would be mapped into user space. Should I simply bundle them
> together in my driver into one contiguous space or should I make the user
> perform m
If I could, let me ask another question. My device could potential have up
to 6 BARs, that would be mapped into user space. Should I simply bundle
them together in my driver into one contiguous space or should I make the
user perform multiple mmap calls? If I go the multiple mmap route, how do I
11 matches
Mail list logo
