On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700
Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
> Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of
> people use
> (these chips are in use on a lot of laptops) is there a document
> somewhere that explains
> what changes need to be made in code for this new tty s
On Fri, 23 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote:
> Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 12:22:57 +0300
> From: Gleb Kurtsou
> To: Lukáš Czerner
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: How to change vnode operations ?
>
> On (23/04/2010 08:10), Lukáš Czerner wrote:
> > On Thu, 22 Apr 2010, Gleb Kurtsou wrote
Le Fri, 23 Apr 2010 11:20:50 +0200,
Michael Cardell Widerkrantz a écrit :
> I was recently given an original Happy Hacking Keyboard. As I
> sometimes work in the FreeBSD console, I wanted to have my usual
> console keymap adjusted to the new keyboard, but didn't know the
> scancode for the HHKB m
On 04/16/2010 05:18, krad wrote:
> On 16 April 2010 09:39, David Xu wrote:
>
>> Jeremy Lea wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> This is off topic to this list, but I dont want to subscribe to -chat
>>> just to post there... Someone is currently running a distributed SSH
>>> attack against one of my boxes -
In message: <20100424102255.12d78...@ernst.jennejohn.org>
Gary Jennejohn writes:
: On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700
: Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
:
: > Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of
: > people use
: > (these chips are in use on a lot of laptops
Hello Hackers & Current,
I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
set
of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
independently of a ports build?
Right now, I use the base GCC to compile the world and kernel, and
GCC44
for
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> Hello Hackers & Current,
>
> I was wondering it if is possible, or if it can be done so a separate
> set
> of CC, CXX, etc can be specified for building the world and kernel
> independently of a ports build?
>
> Right now,
On 4/24/2010 8:29 AM, M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message:<20100424102255.12d78...@ernst.jennejohn.org>
Gary Jennejohn writes:
: On Fri, 23 Apr 2010 16:27:12 -0700
: Ted Mittelstaedt wrote:
:
:>Setting aside the question of why do we break software that a lot of
:> people use
:>
On 04/24/10 09:42, Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote:
> Hello Hackers & Current,
Please don't crosspost. If you're not what list to post to, the
algorithm is: If the question is about a port, or the ports in general,
use freebsd-ports@, otherwise use freebsd-questi...@. This post should
have gone to -ports
On 24 April 2010 14:46, jhell wrote:
> On 04/16/2010 05:18, krad wrote:
> > On 16 April 2010 09:39, David Xu wrote:
> >
> >> Jeremy Lea wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> This is off topic to this list, but I dont want to subscribe to -chat
> >>> just to post there... Someone is currently runnin
Hello.
The ServeRAID driver, or ips(4), seems to distinguish read or write requests
with a macro called ips_read_request(), which is defined as
#define ips_read_request(iobuf) ((iobuf)->bio_cmd == BIO_READ)
in its strategy routine and a few other places. So when the request is
B
Hi,
On Sat, Apr 24, 2010 at 8:20 PM, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The ServeRAID driver, or ips(4), seems to distinguish read or write requests
> with a macro called ips_read_request(), which is defined as
>
> #define ips_read_request(iobuf) ((iobuf)->bio_cmd == BIO_READ)
>
12 matches
Mail list logo
