Re: Build world with DEBUG_FLAGS='-g -O0'

2010-04-13 Thread Bernd Walter
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:49:08AM +0400, Dmitry Krivenok wrote: > Is there a simple way to build size constrained parts of world (e.g. > bootcode) with '-O2' and other > parts with '-O0'? You can build without bootcode: WITHOUT_BOOT=YES > On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:54 PM, Bernd Walter wrote: >

Re: make pkg_install suite reusable, please

2010-04-13 Thread Alexander Churanov
2010/4/11 Robert Watson > So I have no particular opinion on this tool, but I will say that in > general, it would be nice if programs were often thin wrappers around a > library that could be reused, not just command line tools. > > Robert > Robert, The reusable library is great. The question

Re: make pkg_install suite reusable, please

2010-04-13 Thread Alexander Churanov
^re-library^library ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-hackers-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"

Re: KLM unloading on error

2010-04-13 Thread Andrey V. Elsukov
On 13.04.2010 4:56, Patrick Mahan wrote: I have a requirement that when a KLM I am building fails during MOD_LOAD, it should be unloaded. Currently, I am seeing even if I return an error (eg. EINVAL or ENOSYS) the KLM is still shown as loaded (using kldstat). Instead, I would like it to fail and

Re: KLM unloading on error

2010-04-13 Thread John Baldwin
On Tuesday 13 April 2010 6:45:58 am Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: > On 13.04.2010 4:56, Patrick Mahan wrote: > > I have a requirement that when a KLM I am building fails during MOD_LOAD, > > it should be unloaded. Currently, I am seeing even if I return an error > > (eg. EINVAL or ENOSYS) the KLM is sti

Re: KLM unloading on error

2010-04-13 Thread Patrick Mahan
*smack* sorry, should have posted it. I am running FreeBSD 8.0 Release p2 (amd64). Thanks, Patrick Andrey V. Elsukov wrote: On 13.04.2010 4:56, Patrick Mahan wrote: I have a requirement that when a KLM I am building fails during MOD_LOAD, it should be unloaded. Currently, I am seeing even if

GSoC 2010

2010-04-13 Thread Igor Druzhinin
Hello, Robert Watson I have considered your remarks to my proposal. Now I have some problems with GSoC site so I've decided to post my comment here. About choosing the best method for current hardware: I think that the best way to realise it is to use small userspace shared memory region where

RPC and NFS more than 16 groups

2010-04-13 Thread Knowledge Seeker
Hi, I need to have my NFS server to authenticate more than 16 groups when there is a file access. I would like to know if I can just redefine my MACROS to accomplish that. The macro would be: NGRPS, because it is tested against the variable ngroups which comes from NGROUPS value. /* gids compos

Re: RPC and NFS more than 16 groups

2010-04-13 Thread Brooks Davis
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 11:00:48PM +, Knowledge Seeker wrote: > Hi, > I need to have my NFS server to authenticate more than 16 groups when there > is a file access. > > I would like to know if I can just redefine my MACROS to accomplish that. > > The macro would be: NGRPS, because it is tes