Re: package building failure irritation

2010-02-27 Thread xorquewasp
On 2010-02-26 17:38:00, Greg Larkin wrote: > Can you post a full log file of the process somewhere? The best way to > capture it is with the commands: 'Lo, I did actually send a log in response to DES' email but I sent the email from the wrong account and it still awaits list moderation. Here i

Re: `make cleanworld` and /usr/obj/lib32/usr/src

2010-02-27 Thread Alexander Best
how about something like this? alex Gary Jennejohn schrieb am 2010-02-22: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:20:14 +0100 (CET) > Alexander Best wrote: > > hi there, > > anybody fancy the idea of including /usr/obj/lib32/usr/src in the > > cleanworld > > target on amd64? > Seems like a reasonable thing

Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info

2010-02-27 Thread Ed Schouten
Hello Alexander, * Alexander Best wrote: > + printf(" Stepping = %u" > +" Model = %u" > +" Family = %u", > +cpu_id & CPUID_STEPPING, > +CPUID_TO_MODEL(cpu_id), > +CPUID_TO_FAMILY(cpu

Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info

2010-02-27 Thread Alexander Best
hmm...i guess the person who added the CPUID_TO_* macros to /usr/include/machine/specialreg.h thought a CPUID_TO_STEPPING macro wasn't necessary since getting the stepping from cpu_id can be done fairly easy without any shifting and such. a CPUID_TO_STEPPING macro would look something like this:

Re: [patch] extending {amd64|i386} cpu info

2010-02-27 Thread Garrett Cooper
On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 7:19 PM, Alexander Best wrote: > hi there, > > i always forget how to decipher model and family from the cpu id. of course > there're 3rd party tools to do that for you, but instead i decided to hack the > kernel. ;) > > maybe somebody finds these changes useful. I thi