On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:20:14 +0100 (CET)
Alexander Best wrote:
> hi there,
>
> anybody fancy the idea of including /usr/obj/lib32/usr/src in the cleanworld
> target on amd64?
>
Seems like a reasonable thing to do.
---
Gary Jennejohn
___
freebsd-hack
On 7:49 19-02-10, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Hello;
>
> I've sent some private messages before trying to get
> some updates to the Project ideas page
> http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ideas.html
I'd like to see the whole thing moved to the wiki.
--
Joel
__
>Just out of curiosity, can you attach to the process via gdb and get a
>backtrace? This smells like a locked pthread_join I hit in my own code a few
>weeks ago
I'm not using the debug version of ntpd so the backtrace isn't too useful, but
here's what I get:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x000800d52bfc in
You're going to need a debug version of libc, too. gdb won't be able
to find a backtrace out of a libc function without it.
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any ma
>You're going to need a debug version of libc, too. gdb won't be able to find
>a backtrace out of a libc function without it.
Yeah, you're right. This is definitely an annoying bug...
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.o
- Original Message
...
>
> On 7:49 19-02-10, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > Hello;
> >
> > I've sent some private messages before trying to get
> > some updates to the Project ideas page
> > http://www.freebsd.org/projects/ideas/ideas.html
>
>
> I'd like to see the whole thing moved to
On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:48:36AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>
>
> - Original Message
> ...
> >
> > On 7:49 19-02-10, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> > > Hello;
> > >
> > > I've sent some private messages before trying to get
> > > some updates to the Project ideas page
> > > http://ww
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 1:00 AM, Aditya Sarawgi
wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 06:48:36AM -0800, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>>
>>
>> - Original Message
>> ...
>> >
>> > On 7:49 19-02-10, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
>> > > Hello;
>> > >
>> > > I've sent some private messages before trying to g
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:17:37PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
> Juergen,
>
> Could you try the current version of read_open_filename from:
>
> http://libarchive.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/libarchive/archive_read_open_filename.c
>
> You should be able to just copy it into your FreeBSD source
> tree
Juergen Lock wrote:
On Sun, Feb 21, 2010 at 05:17:37PM -0800, Tim Kientzle wrote:
Could you try the current version of read_open_filename from:
http://libarchive.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/libarchive/archive_read_open_filename.c
Small but important bug:
Index: archive_read_open_filename.c
@@
Hi,
I am trying to understand how msleep() routine suspends the currently
executing thread. I see that msleep() calls sleepq_wait().
What I don't understand here is the way in which sched_lock mutex is
handled.
I took the following snippet from FreeBSD 6:
sleepq_wait(void *wchan)
{
MPASS
11 matches
Mail list logo