Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail

2009-11-21 Thread perryh
KAYVEN RIESE wrote: > Is there any reason to fear Microsoft viruses infecting Wine programs? In principle, yes, because Wine is supposed to be a complete reimplementation of the win32 API, thus any program that runs differently on Wine than on Windows demonstrates a bug in Wine. (IIRC there are a

Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail

2009-11-21 Thread Peter Jeremy
On 2009-Nov-19 17:12:19 -0600, "Sam Fourman Jr." wrote: >I would like to help get this working.. is there a howto somewhere to >setup a i386 jail on amd64? >I used teh instructions on http://wiki.freebsd.org/Wine (and pointed >the jail to /compat/i386) I haven't tried wine, but I do have an i386

Re: Wine on amd64 in 32 bit jail

2009-11-21 Thread Artem Belevich
> Note that some tools that poke around in kernel innards won't work - > ps and lsof are the most obvious.  ktrace works but the resultant > ktrace.out files need to read with an amd64 kdump. Some of those issues can be solved by using within 32-bit jail statically linked 64-bit binaries. It does

PUFFS SoC project?

2009-11-21 Thread Ivan Voras
What is the status of this year's SoC projects? Specifically, does anyone know what happened to PUFFS? (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SOC2009TatsianaSeveryna) ? ___ freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hacke

Re: PUFFS SoC project?

2009-11-21 Thread Gleb Kurtsou
On (21/11/2009 21:40), Ivan Voras wrote: > What is the status of this year's SoC projects? Specifically, does > anyone know what happened to PUFFS? > (http://wiki.freebsd.org/SOC2009TatsianaSeveryna) ? As far as I know it is in a pretty good shape. Tatsiana is busy with real job, and has "passed" m