Re: fcntl(F_RDAHEAD)

2009-09-22 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:29:09PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:12:45PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > What I dislike about the patch is the new kernel-private flag that is > > > eaten from the open(2) flags namespace. We do already have FHASLOCK, > > > so far the o

Re: fcntl(F_RDAHEAD)

2009-09-22 Thread Kostik Belousov
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:28:48AM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:29:09PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:12:45PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > What I dislike about the patch is the new kernel-private flag that is > > > > eaten from the

Re: fcntl(F_RDAHEAD)

2009-09-22 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:53:46AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 11:28:48AM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:29:09PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 03:12:45PM +0400, Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > > > > > What I dislike

Re: fcntl(F_RDAHEAD)

2009-09-22 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 02:29:09PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > > > What I dislike about the patch is the new kernel-private flag that is > > > eaten from the open(2) flags namespace. We do already have FHASLOCK, > > > so far the only such flag. > > > > We can change > > intf_seqcount; >

Re: fcntl(F_RDAHEAD)

2009-09-22 Thread Igor Sysoev
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:40:27AM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 03:26:41PM -0700, Xin LI wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi, Igor, > > > > Igor Sysoev wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > nginx-0.8.15 can use completely non-blocking sendfi

Re: ZFS group ownership

2009-09-22 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 01:49:36PM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: [...] > Now I try to do the same on a zfs partition on the same machine > This is what I see with ls > --- > ls -la > total 4 > drwxrwx--- 3 www www 4 Sep 12 13:43 . >

Re: FreeBSD SVN repository mirror with local branches ability

2009-09-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Sunday 20 September 2009 10:43:01 am sojdaa wrote: > > Hello > > Like in the subject, I want to install SVN FreeBSD repo mirror and would > like to have the possibility to create my own branches, that will be merged > with synchronized local mirror. I've done this using svk after reading the >

Re: genuine cpu I386_CPU kernel support

2009-09-22 Thread John Baldwin
On Monday 21 September 2009 8:03:43 am Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Hi, > Reference: > > From: Alexey Shuvaev > > Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:56:59 +0200 > > Message-id: <20090918125659.ga88...@wep4035.physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> > > Alexey Shuvaev wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 18

Re: genuine cpu I386_CPU kernel support

2009-09-22 Thread Nate Eldredge
On Tue, 22 Sep 2009, John Baldwin wrote: My comment is to just use 4.x (seriously). A true 386 is going to be quite slow and the overhead of many things added that work well on newer processors is going to be very painful on a 386 (probably on a 486 as well). 4.x runs fine on a 386 and should