Hi,
I'm about to factor out some taskqueue-alike code from USB(II) and I need to
know at which priority taskqueues are running. I know there is a priority
argument which can be specified for TASK_INIT(), but tracing in the code
shows that this is just a queue-priority. At which priority level i
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
> port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
> I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
> the cross tools, you should be able to rebuild the native
>
On Tuesday 19 May 2009 3:23:39 am Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm about to factor out some taskqueue-alike code from USB(II) and I need to
> know at which priority taskqueues are running. I know there is a priority
> argument which can be specified for TASK_INIT(), but tracing in the co
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Well, I used a newer binutils on sparc when I did the original
port. Once I built the cross compiler and binutils toolset,
I was done with it. After the native compiler is built using
the cross
On Tue, 19 May 2009, xorquew...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 2009-05-18 18:36:15, Daniel Eischen wrote:
Hmm, if the system binutils is 2.15, then it should build
as a cross. You can do a cross build of all FreeBSD - I
think you just set TARGET="amd64" to build amd64 from
a different arch. Part of
On 2009-05-19 09:51:08, Daniel Eischen wrote:
>
> Even so, you shouldn't need a cross-binutils, only a native
> (amd64) binutils. Your port won't be a cross port, but a
> native amd64 port. The native amd64 GNAT will need a native
> binutils, not a cross binutils. The only thing you will have
>
Hello,
Is there any ongoing work on adding support for IPv6 to BSNMP? Do you
have an idea of how much effort it would need?
Thanks in advance.
--
My preferred quotation of Robert Louis Stevenson is "You cannot
make an omelette without breaking eggs". Not because I like the
omelettes, but becaus
Hello, don't know if this has been discussed but here it goes.
I have read recently this
http://www.wwpi.com/hardware/hardware/6540-ethernet-tunneling-through-pci-express-inter-processor-communication-low-latency-storage-io
It's about using PCIe to connect 2 servers directly, without using
et
In <20090519193727.7512e4fc...@xroff.net>, emor...@xroff.net write:
>I have read recently this
>http://www.wwpi.com/hardware/hardware/6540-ethernet-tunneling-through-pci-express-inter-processor-communication-low-latency-storage-io
(From a company that makes PCIe switches to connect multiple root
c
9 matches
Mail list logo
