Vincent Hoffman wrote:
On 11/4/09 21:56, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
I have 3 domains that are registered with no-ip.com
(istudentunion.com, org and net). All three are also using their
"no-ip plus" service which provides both static and dynamic resolution
via their nameservers. When I confi
On 11/4/09 21:56, Aryeh M. Friedman wrote:
> I have 3 domains that are registered with no-ip.com
> (istudentunion.com, org and net). All three are also using their
> "no-ip plus" service which provides both static and dynamic resolution
> via their nameservers. When I configure the domains name
The other way around this is to have the nameservers for the domain
to be in an already resolving domain, that way you dont need to worry
about glue. This is very common.
I had already used the second trick earlier today (after posting the
message) and what I did is pointed a "dead" dom
On Thu, 2009-04-09 at 16:24 +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I wonder if anybody has an issue like I do:
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.utilities.smartmontools/6354
>
> Does anybody has guesses/clues about what might be happening?
>
I couldn't see anything specifically wrong with the output.
On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:39:05PM +0200, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> I think this can be improved.
I have a patch now; it does not handle all cases but the effect on the
code is minimal. I decided to go with the readahead but only do it for
the first line.
To avoid problems with traps not being exe
5 matches
Mail list logo
