> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >> Danny Braniss wrote:
> >>> it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
> >>> it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
> >>> 189100 ok
> >>> 189150 fails
> >>> I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
> >>>
> >>>
> >> 189150 is in the middle of a big
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of related commits. Try
upda
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
Danny Braniss wrote:
it seems March 12 was a bit off :-)
it took some time, but I managed to close the gap:
189100 ok
189150 fails
I will continue tomorrow, but this should be helpful.
189150 is in the middle of a big string of rela
On Sat, 2009-03-28 at 20:37 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Coleman Kane wrote:
>
> > I haven't seen any activity on the above email, and I am curious if:
> > 1) It was missed (and this really does affect people)
> > 2) Nobody cross-compiles using the mingw32-* ports (it is really very
On 2009-Mar-27 14:19:16 -0400, Alexander Sack wrote:
>On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:31 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> In message <49cd0405.1060...@samsco.org>, Scott Long writes:
>>
>>>I've been talking about this for years. All I need is help with the VM
>>>magic to create the page on fork. I als
On 2009-Mar-29 08:35:45 +0800, David Xu wrote:
>Julian Elischer wrote:
>> interestingly it is even feasible to have a per-thread page..
>> it requires that the scheduler change a page table entry tough.
>
>I will knock his door at midnight if he added such a heavy weight
>task in the scheduler, TL
Hi Current and Hackers,
I have only seen this recently and was wondering if anyone else can
confirm
this as a bug or perhaps a setup problem on my end. I think it started to
appear with 8-Current from about the 25th of march.
Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an e
Hi,
> On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:26:04 +
> Pegasus Mc Cleaft said:
ken>I have only seen this recently and was wondering if anyone else can
confirm
ken> this as a bug or perhaps a setup problem on my end. I think it started to
ken> appear with 8-Current from about the 25th of march
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 2:07 PM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> On 2009-Mar-27 14:19:16 -0400, Alexander Sack wrote:
>>I'm assuming folks are still in love with the TSC because it still the
>>cheapest as oppose ACPI-fast or HPET to even contemplate this?
>
> That is its major advantage. It might be feasi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I just had to see if I could locate if there was a gnome project page by looking
at the FreeBSD web pages. Why don't you try that yourself? I'll tell you, it's
really FAR from being obvious. I'm just saying, even if folks don't want to
change the we
Hi Hajimu,
> ken> Any time I do a ping6 or traceroute6 I receive an error stating
> "Invalid ken> value for hints." However, I am able to do all other
> functions (telnet, ssh, ken> etc.)
>
> ken> feathers# ping6 ipv6.google.com
> ken> ping6: Invalid value for hints
>
> ken> feathers# traceroute
I have been giving some thought lately on some ideas I would like to
do for Google Summer of Code. I haven't posted my application yet, as
I hope to get some feedback first.
I want to make an OpenVMS inspired file system. The key elements would
be record oriented I/O, transaction processing and as
Aram Havarneanu wrote:
I have been giving some thought lately on some ideas I would like to
do for Google Summer of Code. I haven't posted my application yet, as
I hope to get some feedback first.
An interesting idea, but it sounds much too
ambitious for a six-week summer project.
I suggest yo
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doing userland spinlock, if userland asks
a page, kernel will allocate it and
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doing userland spinlock, if userland asks
a page, kernel will
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
> I just had to see if I could locate if there was a gnome project page
> by looking at the FreeBSD web pages. Why don't you try that
> yourself? I'll tell you, it's really FAR from being obvious. I'm
> just saying, even if folks don't want
David Xu wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doing userland spinlock, if userland asks
a
Julian Elischer wrote:
David Xu wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doing userland spinl
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
David Xu wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and userland when I was doi
Julian Elischer wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
David Xu wrote:
David Xu wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
depends on the hardware.
anyhow I was only saying it was possible, not necessarily
good or even useful.
I had done some works for thread private page shared by kernel
and
RW wrote:
On Sun, 29 Mar 2009 17:40:30 -0400
Chuck Robey wrote:
I just had to see if I could locate if there was a gnome project page
by looking at the FreeBSD web pages. Why don't you try that
yourself? I'll tell you, it's really FAR from being obvious. I'm
just saying, even if folks don't
21 matches
Mail list logo
