Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

Roman Divacky wrote: > On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:46:22PM -0800, per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > >> By default, LLVM has a built-in prototype of pow(), similar to > > > >> GCC. Unlike GCC, LLVM raises a compiler error by default ... > > > > > ... it's invalid code to have a function named pow

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

* per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding? And all applications that use . -- Ed Schouten WWW: http://80386.nl/ pgpwD14uSm0Hj.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: hosted, or not (Re: Renaming all symbols in libmp(3))

On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:24:56AM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > * per...@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > So perhaps one solution would be to compile libmp with -ffreestanding? > > And all applications that use . which is a nonsense... please move forward ___

Fwd: Kernel conference Australia

Early days, this could be cool. Interested speakers might consider approaching their employers or the FreeBSD Foundation to obtain assistance. Begin forwarded message: From: Daniel Carosone Date: 28 February 2009 7:19:47 AM To: current-us...@netbsd.org, regional...@netbsd.org Subject: Ker