Hi,
On 30 Sep 2008, at 01:10, Rich Healey wrote:
Recently I'm getting a lot of brute force attempts on my server, in
the
past I've used various tips and tricks with linux boxes but many of
them
were fairly linux specific.
What do you BSD guys use for this purpose?
[various solutions prop
-On [20080930 05:14], Rich Healey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>What do you BSD guys use for this purpose?
I actually use blockhosts, which is a Python solution you tie into
hosts.allow.
http://www.aczoom.com/cms/blockhosts
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai
イェルーン ラウフロック ヴァン デル ウェル
According to Henrik Hudson:
> Yeap, -security
>
> However, also try this in pf.conf (specific rules related to this; you'll
> need
> more for a real pf.conf):
>
> table { } persist
> block in quick from
> pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port ssh keep state
> (max-src-conn
Rich Healey wrote:
> Recently I'm getting a lot of brute force attempts on my server, in the
> past I've used various tips and tricks with linux boxes but many of them
> were fairly linux specific.
>
> What do you BSD guys use for this purpose?
There's nothing that replaces using either *goo
How do I unchown a directory after I: chown -R /etc
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
-On [20080930 11:26], Mike Price ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>How do I unchown a directory after I: chown -R /etc
There is no unchown. You either rechown with the correct users or you use
mtree with one of the dist files in /etc/mtree to recreate the directory
structure with the correct rig
Andrey V. Elsukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >Can you provide me datasheet and technical reference material to what
> >"ATA Security" is? Which ATA specification is this documented in? I'd
> >like to read it.
>
> I think you can found it in ATA-ATAPI-7 vol.1: "4.7
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 09:56:32AM +0200, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20080930 05:14], Rich Healey ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> >What do you BSD guys use for this purpose?
>
> I actually use blockhosts, which is a Python solution you tie into
> host
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 02:25:54AM -0700, Mike Price wrote:
> How do I unchown a directory after I: chown -R /etc
You can't. Restore /etc from backups.
And ***please*** stop posting this stuff to -hackers. It is not the
appropriate list for it. Start using -questions.
--
| Jeremy Chadwick
Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you're merely annoyed about the large amount of logging entries
> caused by the break-in attempts, a good solution is to move the sshd
> service from the standard port 22 to a different, non-standard port
The best choice is 443, as many corporate fire
Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mike Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > How do I unchown a directory after I: chown -R /etc
> You can't. Restore /etc from backups.
Better solution: use mtree to generate a spec file from a clean tree and
apply it. You can get a clean copy of etc
Quoting Rich Healey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Recently I'm getting a lot of brute force attempts on my server, in the
past I've used various tips and tricks with linux boxes but many of them
were fairly linux specific.
What do you BSD guys use for this
Daniel Roethlisberger wrote:
Andrey V. Elsukov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30:
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
Can you provide me datasheet and technical reference material to what
"ATA Security" is? Which ATA specification is this documented in? I'd
like to read it.
I think you can fou
Ollivier Robert <> wrote:
> According to Henrik Hudson:
> > Yeap, -security
> >
> > However, also try this in pf.conf (specific rules related to this; you'll
> > need
> > more for a real pf.conf):
> >
> > table { } persist
> > block in quick from
> > pass in on $ext_if proto tcp fro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Oliver Fromme wrote:
| Ollivier Robert <> wrote:
| > According to Henrik Hudson:
| > > Yeap, -security
| > >
| > > However, also try this in pf.conf (specific rules related to this; you'll need
| > > more for a real pf.conf):
| > >
| >
Hello guys,
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008 20:30:33 -0700, Jeremy Chadwick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 10:10:59AM +1000, Rich Healey wrote:
>> Recently I'm getting a lot of brute force attempts on my server, in the
>> past I've used various tips and tricks with linux boxes but many
On Tue, Sep 30, 2008 at 04:01:26PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Ollivier Robert <> wrote:
> > According to Henrik Hudson:
> > > Yeap, -security
> > >
> > > However, also try this in pf.conf (specific rules related to this;
> you'll need
> > > more for a real pf.conf):
> > >
> > > table
Pierre Riteau wrote:
> Oliver Fromme wrote:
> > Ollivier Robert wrote:
> > > According to Henrik Hudson:
> > > > Yeap, -security
> > > >
> > > > However, also try this in pf.conf (specific rules related to this;
> > > > you'll need
> > > > more for a real pf.conf):
> > > >
> > > > tab
In response to Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Pierre Riteau wrote:
>
> > Because the 3-way handshake ensures that the source address is not
> being
> > spoofed, more aggressive action can be taken based on these limits.
>
> s/not being spoofed/more difficult to spoofe/ ;-)
O
Bill Moran wrote:
> In response to Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Pierre Riteau wrote:
> >
> > > Because the 3-way handshake ensures that the source address is not
> > > being
> > > spoofed, more aggressive action can be taken based on these limits.
> >
> > s/not being
2008/9/30 Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Bill Moran wrote:
> > In response to Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Pierre Riteau wrote:
> > >
> > > > Because the 3-way handshake ensures that the source address is
> not being
> > > > spoofed, more aggressive action can be
Hi,
I've needed to set different idle levels for adaptive mode while on
battery or on AC power. Cause powerd can only set mode (min, max, adp)
for each power source, I've added this ability and it seems to be a
good idea to share this improvement with others.
Best regards, gelraen.
P.S.: Sorry f
Daniel Roethlisberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2008-09-30:
> I've added experimental support for the ATA Security command set to
> atacontrol. Please test and review. If you have some spare disk(s)
> with ATA Security support and a BIOS which does not freeze the security
> configuration, I'd like to h
23 matches
Mail list logo
