On Tuesday 09 September 2008 06:50:37 Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Sep 09), Daan Vreeken said:
> > On Monday 08 September 2008 22:03:29 Dan Mahoney, System Admin wrote:
> > > On Mon, 8 Sep 2008, Dan Nelson wrote:
> > > > In the last episode (Sep 08), Dan Mahoney, System Admin said:
> >
On Tue, 9 Sep 2008, Daan Vreeken wrote:
Which is to say, they don't include the UID -- and I have several hundred
sites, each with its own UID.
Yes, I could go ahead and set up a thousand "deny" rules, one for each
UID -- but being able to log this info (since it IS being checked) would
be g
On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:26:27PM -0400, jT wrote:
> > hackers,
> >
> > since tytso had updated ext3 -- i've noticed that i can't use my
> > 265-byte inode ext3 drives -- is there any effort to update it? If
> > not -- if you
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:53:51PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:26:27PM -0400, jT wrote:
> > > hackers,
> > >
> > > since tytso had updated ext3 -- i've noticed that i can't use my
> > > 265-byte
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:53:51PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008 at 07:26:27PM -0400, jT wrote:
> > > > hackers,
> > > >
> > > > sinc
Hi all,
thanks very much for your valuable inputs.
I found out the way to exit the thread.
Problem was psignal(p, SIGKILL); , the p->p_siglist was being reset after
propagating this signal to threads associated with this proc.
Hence i could poll once in a way if any unhandled signals were in
curth
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 03:37:47PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 08:29:17AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 02:53:51PM +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 07, 2008 at 11:07:47AM -0400, Wesley Shields wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Sep 06, 2008
On Thursday 04 September 2008 08:00:04 am Marc Lörner wrote:
> Hello,
> I just read through the code of mutexes and turnstiles
> and it seems to me that _mtx_lock_sleep and _mtx_unlock_sleep
> are some kind of asymmetric when turning SMP and adaptive mutexes
> on in kernel-configuration.
>
> On lo
8 matches
Mail list logo