Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
At present day my central FWs are simply standard 2 boxes (each one cost
1000 euros aprox); I remember the Juniper guy offering me a 'ch
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
>> Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
>
> I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
> standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
>
> At present day my central FWs are simply standard 2 boxes
I'm amazed at the fact that people are actually comparing FreeBSD with
pf to Juniper routers. I've a bit of experience with M20s and M40s, and
I can assure you they're VERY different than a little x86 PC routing
packets, and are significantly faster due to hardware routing.
For example, you shou
Hello,
I've updated usb/80361, see
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
what makes me worry is that the problem was raised in 5.4-RC3 in 2005
and still exists in 7.0R in
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 10:21:51AM +0200, Jordi Espasa Clofent wrote:
>>> Well, there are always Juniper Networks boxes :-)
>> I do the same (even more in some points) as Juniper boxes with simple
>> standard boxes with OpenBSD and PF.
>>
>> At present day my central FWs
Matthias Apitz wrote:
> I've updated usb/80361, see
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
> because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
> when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
I'm just wondering what happens if you enforce a rescan
on the (virtual)
Hi List,
I am running into a weird issue. On a 6.2 stable, 32bits built with options
MAC,
I can run pkg_add of anything. But a 6.2 stable, 64bits built with MAC won't
let
me do pkg_add. If anybody has an input, please advise. Below is the output
on the 64 bits machine:
net3# pkg_add test.tbz
+CONT
On (06/08/2008 19:29), Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Matthias Apitz wrote:
> > I've updated usb/80361, see
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=80361
> > because I have the same problem as well that an USB key attaches fine
> > when plugged in at boot time, but not later:
Situation here is s
To who it may concern,
I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like to
increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
In Solaris 10 the Services Management Facility (SMF) was introduced.
Basical
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> To who it may concern,
>
> I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
> BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like to
> increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD.
>
> In Sol
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> To who it may concern,
>>
>> I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator.
>> I use
>> BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both OS's but I would like
>> to
>> increase the administrative capability of FreeBSD
Hello
my trouble with nic
part of `dmesg` output
-
em0: port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
0xfebc-0xfebd,0xfeb8-0xfebb irq 19 at device 2.0 on pci2
em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
device_attach: em0 attach returned
0n Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 07:14:51PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I would like to submit the idea of implementing a similar environment
>into FreeBSD. After looking through the developers links and googling I
>found no project for FreeBSD that implemented anything similar to thi
Hello
my trouble with nic
part of `dmesg` output
-
em0: port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
0xfebc-0xfebd,0xfeb8-0xfebb irq 19 at device 2.0 on pci2
em0: The EEPROM Checksum Is Not Valid
device_attach: em0 attach returned
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 08:34:44AM +0400, Vladimir Ermakov wrote:
> Hello
>
> my trouble with nic
>
> part of `dmesg` output
> -
> em0: port 0xec00-0xec3f mem
> 0xfebc-0xfebd,0xfeb8-0xfebb irq 19 at device 2.0 o
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:34:51 -0400
"Michael B Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 7:14 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > To who it may concern,
> >
> > I am A FreeBSD administrator as well as a Solaris Administrator. I use
> > BSD at home but Solaris at work. I love both
On Thu, Aug 7, 2008 at 1:06 AM, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Aug 2008 22:34:51 -0400
> "Michael B Allen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> As for getting rid of rc.d scripts, yes they're decrepit and I would
>> love to see them go but they're simple and third party software may
>>
The Solaris smf tools provide some nice facilities: one is single
interface to start, stop, check and restart all the services on a
system. We pretty much have that ...
The other is a single interface to enable, disable and query the
status of all the services. All we really have is the last one.
18 matches
Mail list logo
