This copytree code is from bsd.port.mk, and I've been asked to try and
find a fix. This is very handy for installing a whole tree (like a
web app) keeping everything intact. It wasn't designed to copy to a
populated directory so it affects everything in that dir, not just
what's being installed
On Sunday 18 May 2008, Beech Rintoul said:
> This copytree code is from bsd.port.mk, and I've been asked to try
> and find a fix. This is very handy for installing a whole tree
> (like a web app) keeping everything intact. It wasn't designed to
> copy to a populated directory so it affects everythi
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:55 AM, Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008, Beech Rintoul said:
> > This copytree code is from bsd.port.mk, and I've been asked to try
> > and find a fix. This is very handy for installing a whole tree
> > (like a web app) keeping everything
Beech Rintoul wrote:
> This copytree code is from bsd.port.mk, and I've been asked to try and
> find a fix. This is very handy for installing a whole tree (like a
> web app) keeping everything intact. It wasn't designed to copy to a
> populated directory so it affects everything in that dir,
On Monday 12 May 2008 01:23:28 pm RW wrote:
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:34:35 +0300
>
> Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This is not a real issue, just a code clarification.
> >
> > First a snippet from sys/i386/i386/vm_machdep.c, cpu_reset_real()
> > /*
> > * Attempt to force a reset via
On Sunday 18 May 2008 03:29:45 pm Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:35:44 +0100
>
> Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:50:28 +0100
> > >
> > > Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Mike Meyer wrote:
> > >>> On Sat, 17 May 2008 11:1
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 10:37:11AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008 03:29:45 pm Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 May 2008 19:35:44 +0100
> >
> > Rui Paulo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Mike Meyer wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 18 May 2008 16:50:28 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Rui Paulo <[EMAI
I've found the answer to my RAM puzzle: Hardware design limitation.
- Main board has 32M soldered on,
- Single slot. (lettering on PCB, 168 pin DIMM 3.3V Unbuffered),
can take 1 DIMM (though board works without).
- Plugging in a 32M Ram DIMM, BIOS reports 64 MB.
- Chips on main bo
On Monday 19 May 2008 10:32:02 am John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday 12 May 2008 01:23:28 pm RW wrote:
> > On Mon, 12 May 2008 17:34:35 +0300
> >
> > Andriy Gapon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > This is not a real issue, just a code clarification.
> > >
> > > First a snippet from sys/i386/i386/vm_mac
On Sun, 18 May 2008 23:55:22 -0800
Beech Rintoul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> On Sunday 18 May 2008, Beech Rintoul said:
> > This copytree code is from bsd.port.mk, and I've been asked to try
> > and find a fix. This is very handy for installing a whole tree
> > (like a web app) keeping everyt
--
Top 5 Reasons to Attend the 2008 USENIX Annual Technical Conference
June 22-27, 2008, Boston, MA
http://www.usenix.org/usenix08/progb
--
USENIX '08 offers a cost-effective, one-stop shop for the latest in I
11 matches
Mail list logo