KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I thought freeBSD 7 was still current "bleeding edge?"
No, that's FreeBSD 8. FreeBSD 7.0 is very close to release now, and you
can already run 7-STABLE if you want to.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"william wong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
Who said Linux performs better in a UP environment?
UP performance is close to irrelevant these days anyway; ther
Greetings,
binto wrote:
Hi,
Sorry if a little bit insist & curious.
what is result from:
sysctl -a kern.ipc.maxsockbuf
sysctl -a net.inet.tcp.recvspace
net.inet.tcp.sendspace: 32768
net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 65536
kern.ipc.maxsockbuf: 262144
kern.ipc.nmbclusters: 262144
--
Best Wishes,
Ste
Hello,
Any ideas what could be done to make the hardware sensors usable on HP
servers? I have a bunch of DL3xx, BL2xp, BL4xxc machines running FreeBSD
and all of them have:
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 8.3C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 9.8C
hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 31.3C
These values are co
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 01:58:51PM +0800, william wong wrote:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
Other posters have mentioned that there is a mix of Linux and BSD at
Cisco. I don't work there
On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
> Any ideas what could be done to make the hardware sensors usable on HP
> servers? I have a bunch of DL3xx, BL2xp, BL4xxc machines running FreeBSD
> and all of them have:
> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 8.3C
> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._P
On 2008-01-25 13:58, william wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That brings me to another ponder: why juniper and cisco are using
> FreeBSD and not Linux even Linux performs better in an UP environment?
That's probably something only Juniper and Cisco can answer with a
sufficiently high degree of c
Pardon my lack of proper protocol - this is the first time I've ventured
into reporting FreeBSD bugs, and I'm a bit unsure how to do so.
I just spent several evenings finding out that FreeBSD's bootparamd
isn't 64-bit clean. Turns out, I'm not the only one; in April, 2007,
Tyler Spivey filed PR 1
Hi All,
I am pleased to announce that HLA v1.100 and the HLA standard library (v3.0)
are now running natively under FreeBSD. For those who are unfamiliar with the
product, HLA is a "High Level Assembler" for the 80x86. It allows you to write
portable 80x86 code that runs under Windows, Linux,
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:51:44 -0800 "Jerry Toung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello list,
> I am trying to create an environment where you can't run my binaries on your
> box and I can't run
> your binaries on my system (x86 platform).
> For that, I have modified the system calls table (i.e everyt
Good point. I'll try it.
On Jan 25, 2008 3:30 PM, Xin LI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Jerry Toung wrote:
> > Hello list,
> > I am trying to create an environment where you can't run my binaries on
> your
> > box and I can't run
> > your binaries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jerry Toung wrote:
> Hello list,
> I am trying to create an environment where you can't run my binaries on your
> box and I can't run
> your binaries on my system (x86 platform).
> For that, I have modified the system calls table (i.e everything is off
--- KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
> flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
> technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
> i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop
>
Hi there, I have native firef
On Fri, 25 de Enero de 2008, 1:31 pm, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
>
> i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
> flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
> technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
> i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop
I think this subject
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GNU/Linux isn't tied to rpm's;
Actually, rpm is part of the Linux Standard Base specification, which
all major distributions implement. Debian derivatives use dpkg, but
still have a full set of rpm tools.
* Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080125 07:58] wrote:
> Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Hey guys, something that I've always wanted to do was actually somehow
> > export those handy description strings from the kernel SYSCTL macros
> > in the least obtrusive method possi
Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hey guys, something that I've always wanted to do was actually somehow
> export those handy description strings from the kernel SYSCTL macros
> in the least obtrusive method possible.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~% sysctl -d dev.cpu.0.temperature
dev.cpu.0.temp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2008 at 11:27:35AM +0100, Attila Nagy wrote:
>> Any ideas what could be done to make the hardware sensors usable on HP
>> servers? I have a bunch of DL3xx, BL2xp, BL4xxc machines running FreeBSD
>> and al
Hello list,
I am trying to create an environment where you can't run my binaries on your
box and I can't run
your binaries on my system (x86 platform).
For that, I have modified the system calls table (i.e everything is offset
by 5).
All the files that need to be re-generated, have been.
I ran make
I'm trying to share memory between the kernel and userspace so that I
can communicate between kernel threads and userspace threads with
concurrent lock-free data structures. I can do this if I use
different virtual addresses in the kernel and addresses in userspace.
However, this requir
You could also create a release, burn it to CD, and install from scratch.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubsc
> OK, this is the famous problem with modern CPUs that jkoshy has declined
> to work around :( There are patches for this in perforce, see
>
> http://perforce.freebsd.org/changeView.cgi?CH=126189
"Famous problem" indeed :). I declined the patch because it
is incorrect and incomplete.
First,
Thank you for the feedback Mike.
Points well taken. I'll look into the NetBSD thing.
Jerry
On Jan 25, 2008 3:55 PM, Mike Meyer <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:51:44 -0800 "Jerry Toung" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hello list,
> > I am trying to create an environment whe
Tim Clewlow wrote:
--- KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop
Hi there, I
On Fri, 25 de Enero de 2008, 1:54 pm, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
>
> i wanna goto youtube! {:} i already have firefox installed, is there
> a special port for linux firefox? i better deinstall my existing firefox?
Still think this thread should not be in hackers, however I am ccing
because maybe someo
Karim Fodil-Lemelin wrote:
I have stumbled into a strange problem where my FBSD 4.x box
FreeBSD 4.x is no longer supported. Your best bet at this point would be
to evaluate the 7.0 release candidates, since that branch has a lot of
both stability and performance enhancements.
Good luck,
Hi Mike,
On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:32:12PM -0500, Mike Shuey wrote:
> I just spent several evenings finding out that FreeBSD's bootparamd
> isn't 64-bit clean. Turns out, I'm not the only one; in April, 2007,
> Tyler Spivey filed PR 112163 about this. He also included a simple
> patch, to clear
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Braulio José Solano Rojas wrote:
On Fri, 25 de Enero de 2008, 1:31 pm, KAYVEN RIESE wrote:
i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
i have freeBSD 6.
Good day,
I have stumbled into a strange problem where my FBSD 4.x box keeps
crashing under network traffic load. I have enabled INVARIANTS and
debugging and was able to gather a trace. The context here is that a
listening connection created a syncache entry sent a syn-ack and is now
proce
Rink Springer wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> On Thu, Jan 24, 2008 at 11:32:12PM -0500, Mike Shuey wrote:
>> I just spent several evenings finding out that FreeBSD's bootparamd
>> isn't 64-bit clean. Turns out, I'm not the only one; in April, 2007,
>> Tyler Spivey filed PR 112163 about this. He also inclu
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> GNU/Linux isn't tied to rpm's;
Actually, rpm is part of the Linux Standard Base specification, which
all major distributions implement. Debian derivatives use dpkg, but
still have a full set of rpm tools. Most distributions have higher-
level package mana
Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Julian Elischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I Believe the linux wrapper concept was copied from the freebsd one
> > which was originally called "Project Evil"
> Is it the other way around (Project Evil isa ndiswrapper port, etc),
> or something else.
i have been told that freeBSD does not go well with
flash plugins for browsers, which is quite a ubiquitous
technology in websites. is there any progress on this?
i have freeBSD 6.2-STABLE and gnome desktop
*--*
Kayven Riese, BSCS, MS (P
33 matches
Mail list logo
