On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:33:14AM +0200, Heikki Suonsivu wrote:
>Why anyone would be interested? The eBOX 2300SX cpu is a SoC device, which
>is by far the lowest power consumption I have seen, and this is probably
>cheapest computer on the market, still suitable for number of applications.
> W
Le Sunday 20 January 2008, Peter Jeremy a écrit :
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:33:14AM +0200, Heikki Suonsivu wrote:
> >Why anyone would be interested? The eBOX 2300SX cpu is a SoC device,
> > which is by far the lowest power consumption I have seen, and this is
> > probably cheapest computer on t
On Jan 20, 2008, at 3:42 PM, Thierry Herbelot wrote:
Le Sunday 20 January 2008, Peter Jeremy a écrit :
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 02:33:14AM +0200, Heikki Suonsivu wrote:
Why anyone would be interested? The eBOX 2300SX cpu is a SoC
device,
which is by far the lowest power consumption I have seen
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:21:52 -0800 (PST)
KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it comes with a silly barebones manual that tells you to slide it in
> and screw the screw or some such, not very helpful. it also with a
> USB connector that has one junction fitting the device coupled to
> what
Hello
I am trying to hack in some symlink support into the [sys/boot/i386/]boot2
bootloader (for my project [1]) and I seem to fall short of about 69 bytes:
as -o boot2.o boot2.s
ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostdlib -Ttext 0x2000 -o
boot2.out/build/obj/build/src/sys/boot/i386/boot2/../btx/lib
Adrian Penisoara wrote:
Hello
I am trying to hack in some symlink support into the [sys/boot/i386/]boot2
bootloader (for my project [1]) and I seem to fall short of about 69 bytes:
...
[1] I'm trying to get support for /boot being mounted as a separate FS and
as such I would need to have a
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 10:39:45PM +0200, Adrian Penisoara wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am trying to hack in some symlink support into the [sys/boot/i386/]boot2
> bootloader (for my project [1]) and I seem to fall short of about 69 bytes:
>
> as -o boot2.o boot2.s
> ld -static -N --gc-sections -nostdl
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 09:10:50PM +0100, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:21:52 -0800 (PST)
> KAYVEN RIESE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > it comes with a silly barebones manual that tells you to slide it in
> > and screw the screw or some such, not very helpful. it also with a
>
On Fri, Jan 18, 2008, navneet Upadhyay wrote:
> Hi ,
>My product is successfully running on Linux( all most all versions)
> and HP- UX and Windows .
>
> *It is 100 % C++ code*.
>
> I am planning to support it on FreeBSD, i have two queries :
>
> 1. *How to build my code into binaries*
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008, Heikki Suonsivu wrote:
> There is very low cost microscopic PC (see eBOX 2300 and eBOX 2300SX
> www.compactpc.com.tw), which previously run FreeBSD fine, being based on
> Vortex86 cpu on Sis SoC chip 550. Unfortunately the manufacturer
> switched to a new SoC cpu which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
