On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 02:06:27PM -0800, Bakul Shah wrote:
>> (though the AMD29K could apparently generate
>> dummy bus cycles to limit the number of bit transitions on any cycle
>> to reduce the I/O load).
>
>Are you sure it was the amd29k? I don't recall anything like
>that
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > In the past the alpha port had it too.
>
> No, it was optional and defaulted to off.
It was never optional, since no alpha CPU can do missaligned access
Alphas can fix missaligned ac
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:12:04PM +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 12:14:11AM -0800, Kip Macy wrote:
> > Isn't it everything except x86?
> >
> > -Kip
> x86 has the AC bit in the eflags. The AM bit in cr0 is enabled by the
> kernel, and AC could be switched on by LD_PRELOADe
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:34:33 +0100 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > In the past the alpha port had it too.
> >
> > No, it was optional and defaulted to off.
>
> It was n
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:55:06PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:34:33 +0100 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > > Wilko Bulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > > In the past the alpha port had it t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 09:42:38PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
>> If you do not see any boot messages at all, then my guess is that you
>> probably have messed around with /boot/device.hints (or compiled in a hints
>> file in t
On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 04:34:05PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>astonishment (and embarrassment) others have replied using that ridiculous
>nomenclature "Print#1 and Print#2". Doesn't that seem more than a little
>ridiculous to you?
The only distinction the kernel makes is between "verbose boot" an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:58:32PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
>> booting. If I stick "-v" in /boot.config, then when the kernel probes, all
>> the probes are verbose. Stuff like my HDaudio card print incredibly
>> verbose listing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> All hashs have issues with pooling see
>> http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/index.html... btw it is a
>> old wives tale that the number of buckets should be prime (m
:1) Lots of page faults, which drop performance by a factor of 10
:compared to the case where everything is faulted in.
:
:...
:Is there a way to achieve this that I am overlooking? If not can
:someone give me some advice about what is needed?
:
:Kris
The main problem here is that the backi
"Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote:
> > "Aryeh M. Friedman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> All hashs have issues with pooling see
> >> http://www.burtleburtle.net/bob/hash/index.html... btw it is
> >
On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 20:37:18 +0100 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 30, 2007 at 01:55:06PM -0500, Mike Meyer wrote:
> > On Sun, 30 Dec 2007 10:34:33 +0100 Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 11:37:27PM +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> > > >
12 matches
Mail list logo
