2006/3/6, dima <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sorry my ignorance. Gleb Smirnoff pointed that out privately already. I
looked at the code
> and it seems very much like OpenSolaris implementation to me. You can't
propagate
> priority properly if you don't hold all the current lock holders
somewhere. I tried
I just saw this slashdotted article:
http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be implemented
as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds like a bit of a hack
right now.
Ashley
>From: Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>I just saw this slashdotted article:
>http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
>
>Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be implemented
>as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds like a bit of a hack
>right no
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:17:20AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> >From: Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >I just saw this slashdotted article:
> >http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
> >
> >Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
> >implemented
> >as a
On Tue, 2006-03-07 at 14:43 +0100, Bernd Walter wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 07:17:20AM -0600, Sergey Babkin wrote:
> > >From: Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > >I just saw this slashdotted article:
> > >http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
> > >
> > >Just to satisfy my cur
>From: Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> >From: Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> >I just saw this slashdotted article:
>> >http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
>>
>> Well, I've been running around with this kind of idea for
>> around 10 years now. Never actually implemented i
Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I just saw this slashdotted article:
> http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
>
> Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
> implemented as a GEOM layer? The idea is bloody clever but sounds
> like a bit of a hack right
From: Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Re: NetBSD disk backup over network
Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2006 08:33:37 -0600 (CST)
> >From: Bernd Walter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> >From: Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
> >> >I just saw this slashdotted article:
> >> >http://ezine.daemonnew
On Tue, Mar 07, 2006 at 08:33:37AM -0600 I heard the voice of
Sergey Babkin, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> You can easily save the stream of updates as a redo log (well,
> that's the idea I've been running around with).
Isn't that what the gjournal SoC thing was about?
--
Matthew Fuller (MF48
Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
You can easily save the stream of updates as a redo log (well,
that's the idea I've been running around with).
Isn't that what the gjournal SoC thing was about?
No, not exactly. The idea was to make a journal of a GEOM device I/O
requests on a separate device in the
Hey
Im not sure if this is the right list, but anyway, let me know if im wrong.
What im trying to do is, have a custom program run on a specific tty. Say like
ttyv4, or so. But I
would like to do this without having to login to this ttyv.
So instead of being presented with a login option, I woul
Hi,
I am a user of freebsd 6.0 box. I have couple jails on this box.
One of them are closed apache and mysql. Mysqld creates mysql.sock
for local connections in /tmp dir inside it's jail. Second jail
where i have apache runnig needs to connect to mysqld. Right now
it connect tru IP connection to
Cole wrote:
Hey
Im not sure if this is the right list, but anyway, let me know if im wrong.
What im trying to do is, have a custom program run on a specific tty. Say like
ttyv4, or so. But I would like to do this without having to login to this ttyv.
So instead of being presented with a login
Yeah.
That does help quite a lot. However, I did find something regarding this called
own-tty, but that
was for linux, and also written in like 1998.
http://www.canonical.org/~kragen/sw/usershell.html
I was actually hoping to do something similar. In that I was hoping to just
write a single pro
On Mon, Mar 06, 2006 at 06:40:58PM +0100, Jilles Tjoelker wrote:
> find(1)'s -prune primary does not work if depth-first traversal (-d,
> -depth, also implied by -delete) is in effect. The reason is that it is
> (obviously) not possible to prune a directory when visiting it after all
> entries in i
Le Tuesday 7 March 2006 15:46, Dag-Erling Smørgrav a écrit :
> Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I just saw this slashdotted article:
> > http://ezine.daemonnews.org/200603/dermouse.html
> >
> > Just to satisfy my curiosity, is it the sort of thing that can be
> > implemented as a GEOM l
16 matches
Mail list logo
