Kurt Miller wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 7:26 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote:
On Thursday 26 January 2006 6:56 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote:
I'm working on 1.5 jdk certification on 5.4 and 6.0. One of the jck
te
Hello,
I've tried to do a quick benchmark of FreeBSD's target mode on Fibre
Channel.
The graphs are here:
http://people.fsn.hu/~bra/freebsd/tmode-bench/
--
Attila Nagy e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6
On Thu, Jan 26, 2006 at 07:04:48PM +0100, Oliver Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for jumping into this thread.
> I have the same problem, but on different hardware.
>
> Bruno Ducrot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > First, install sysutils/freeipmi, then try it by this command:
> > > > # bmc-inf
thanks, but I see this patch is against recent HEAD
I've got the yesterdays RELENG_6 sources and can't simply update to HEAD (
it is a server )
so, I've failed to apply your patch cleanly, and failed to recompile the
kernel:
/usr/src/sys/modules/rp/../../dev/rp/rp.c: In function `rp_attachcommon
Vitaliy Skakun writes:
| thanks, but I see this patch is against recent HEAD
|
| I've got the yesterdays RELENG_6 sources and can't simply update to HEAD (
| it is a server )
Give this a shot against RELENG_6:
Index: rp.c
===
RCS fi
On Friday 27 January 2006 9:16 am, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote:
>
> > On Thursday 26 January 2006 7:26 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > >
> > > The modified version does not hang on 5.2. Do you have multiple
> > > interfaces on your 5.4 box?
> >
> > No, the 5.4 box
On Friday 27 January 2006 5:40 am, Fredrik Lindberg wrote:
> Kurt Miller wrote:
> > netstat output when stopping the program at the sendto call on 5.4
> > looks like this:
> > udp4 0 0 localhost.55513172.16.1.36.52099
> >
> > on 6.0:
> > udp4 0 0 172.16.1.37.53952
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Thursday 26 January 2006 7:26 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> >
> > The modified version does not hang on 5.2. Do you have multiple
> > interfaces on your 5.4 box?
>
> No, the 5.4 box is virtually identical to the 6.0 box. I set them both
> up at the same
On Friday 27 January 2006 10:42 am, Kurt Miller wrote:
> On Friday 27 January 2006 9:16 am, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2006, Kurt Miller wrote:
> >
> > > On Thursday 26 January 2006 7:26 pm, Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The modified version does not hang on 5.2. Do you have
Is there any equivalent to the Linux Real Mode interface in FreeBSD? I
would like to port a program called atitvout to FreeBSD, but it uses
calls to the vesa bios in real mode on the x86 arch. I can't seem to
find out how to do this in FreeBSD.
--
Loren M. Lang
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.north
10 matches
Mail list logo