I was looking at the freebsd port of thttpd and i saw this patch :
/usr/ports/www/thttpd/files/patch-mmc.c
This is some sort of file cache, it works by mmap()ing some files and
keeping the mmap address in a hashtable. I suppose this is used to keep
the file in memory until munmap() is called.
The
Thank you for good advises.
I could go ahead.
But, now , my installation of sge for amd64 is stopped due to unkown
reasons
anyone could install sge for amd64?
My message is like belows
-
if [
Hi,
I'm trying to make an iso image that will boot FreeBSD using GRUB
boot loader.
Grub will boot /boot/loader and the loader will boot /boot/kernel. It
goes well on my disk, but when I try to make a livecd, it fails. I spend
some time figuring out that loader does not probe cd it self, it
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 09:39:30AM +0100, Cedric Tabary wrote:
>
> This is some sort of file cache, it works by mmap()ing some files and
> keeping the mmap address in a hashtable. I suppose this is used to keep
> the file in memory until munmap() is called.
I guess this is used for accessing file
- Forwarded message from Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sat, 10 Dec 2005 13:52:43 -0800
From: Josef Grosch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Cardbus panics
I have an IBM T22 thinkpad running FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8. I have the
CardBus devices in the c
On 2005-12-09 21:46, Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In the last episode (Dec 10), Giorgos Keramidas said:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
> use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
Please help me to understand why this patch ? and the difference between
sendfile() and mmap() at the memory or cache level..
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:39:03PM +0900, gama wrote:
> Thank you for good advises.
> I could go ahead.
> But, now , my installation of sge for amd64 is stopped due to unkown
> reasons
> anyone could install sge for amd64?
> My message is like belows
You still didn't turn off java support like it
On 12/12/2005 08:38, Mike Silbersack wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Dec 2005, Cedric Tabary wrote:
>
> >If it is true, doing a sendfile() on some very big files (even if not
> >keeping the descriptor open after) will kill the cache ?
> >
> >Please help me to understand why this patch ? and the difference bet
hi!
i have a little problem with jailctl, (sorry if it's not the right maillist,
dunno where should i ask it)
my question is can i use jailctl with two or more ip/jail or not?
in the jails.conf i have to add hostname:ipaddress per jail, and wonder
if i could make it work with other ip address
:Hello Matt!
:
:I hope you'll make the materials available on the Net.
Yah, I'm putting some slides together and will make them available
after the talk.
-Matt
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mail
On Wednesday 07 December 2005 05:09 pm, Danilo Asara wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$ uname -a
> FreeBSD resolza.fastwebnet.it 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Fri
> Nov18 11:19:38 CET
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/RESOLZA i386
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [~]$
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] [/usr/cras
On 12/12/05, OxY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi!
Hi,
>
> my question is can i use jailctl with two or more ip/jail or not?
AFAIK, you can use bind a jail just to one Ip address...
Don't know if things have changed since 6.0
> thanks for your help!
Hope this helps,
--
Pietro Cerutti
<[EMAI
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:58:06PM +0100, OxY wrote:
>hi!
>
>i have a little problem with jailctl, (sorry if it's not the right maillist,
>dunno where should i ask it)
>
>my question is can i use jailctl with two or more ip/jail or not?
>
>in the jails.conf i have to add hostname:ipaddress per jai
i think i can define other jails with this, am i wrong?
- Original Message -
From: "wiqd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 10:04 PM
Subject: Re: jailctl with multiple ip per jail
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 06:58:06PM +0100, OxY wrote:
On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 10:09:13PM +0100, OxY wrote:
>i think i can define other jails with this, am i wrong?
You can define as many jails as you want with this, and use jailctl to
start and stop them as needed.
Greg
___
freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org ma
yes, i know that, but what i want is to use an existing jail
with 2ip
not to create additional jails..
- Original Message -
From: "wiqd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "OxY" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Monday, December 12, 2005 10:16 PM
Subject: Re: jailctl with multiple ip per jail
On Mo
Hello OxY,
Monday, December 12, 2005, 10:35:33 PM, you wrote:
> yes, i know that, but what i want is to use an existing jail
> with 2ip
> not to create additional jails..
although i dont know if it really works, but here is what i was able
to google (check those mijail patches) :) place your que
Is "diff" program supposed to have a switch at command line to disable
following
(ignore) symbolic links when -r switch is given, like many other
programs do?
In many places, a directory or source file can be symbolically linked
multiple times to
different archives. Since the original source w
19 matches
Mail list logo
