On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 06:12:42PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (sorry for cross-posting, in the future this seems better suited for
> emulation@
> )
>
> Hi;
>
> I didn't see any interest for this on the website but perhaps we should be
> working on improving our SVR4 emulation now that Ope
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
> use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
> It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl()
> to determine the amount of physical memory in a system.
>
> {
>From: Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>> Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
>> use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
>> It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl()
>> to determine the
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 10:05:48PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote:
> In the last episode (Dec 08), Steve Kargl said:
> > Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better use of system
> > memory on systems with more than 4 GB. It appears that
> > libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysctl() to determin
On 2005-12-09 14:02, Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Divacky Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
>>> Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
>>> use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
>>> It appears t
In the last episode (Dec 10), Giorgos Keramidas said:
> >>On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 05:06:16PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> >>> Anyone have any insight into fixing gcc to make better
> >>> use of system memory on systems with more than 4 GB.
> >>> It appears that libiberty/physmem.c tries to use sysct
6 matches
Mail list logo
