Daniel O'Connor wrote:
This work does look neat, but..
Try etcmerge :)
It's a bit of a pain to get started with it, but it is a *lot* faster (human
input wise) than mergemaster. It only asks you about files that you have
modified rather than ones that have been changed by committers (ie does a
Hi Robert,
I don't think your patch is correct, the total linked list can be broken
while the lock is released, thus just passing the link may not be enough
I have submitted a PR[1] for this a month ago but nobody took care of it yet
Regards,
Antoine Pelisse
[1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 11:41:57PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> First let me say that you've obviously put a lot of work into this, and you
> have some very interesting ideas here that are worthy of further discussion.
> Please don't let any of my comments here be understood as criticism, or an
>
[Replying to everyone who mentioned etcmerge or 3-way merge in general]
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:15:59AM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
> It is worth while to mention sysutils/etcmerge.
>
> Having the "three-way" merge makes the process much better. The primary
> way I've shot myself with mergemaster
Robert,
We have gotten some more information from our type1 crash:
>sh lockedvnods
Locked vnodes
>sh alllocks
Process 2204 (dataplay) thread 0xff00b1726a000 (100214)
exclusive sleep mutex inp (udpinp) f = 0 (0xff00cc90fcc8) locked @
/usr/src/sys/netinet/udp_usrreq.c:762
Process 62 (paged
On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 04:11:29AM +0300, Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
> Dear Hackers,
>
> First of all thank you for your time and attention.
>
> I am in the position to implement a large-scale mail server and I
> will never go for anything else but FreeBSD (fixation?).
>
>
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Robert Watson wrote:
> Could you dump the contents of *td and *td->td_proc for me? I'm quite
> interested to know what the value in td->td_proc->p_state is, among other
> things. If I could also have you generate a dump of the KSE group
> structures in td->td_proc->p_ksegrps
Hello All. For a project, I am looking into making the em(4) driver use fast
interrupts. Has someone done this or are there other driver references that
could help me in this?
I understand that the main problems are:
1. Sharing of interrupts.
2. Blocking (memory and mutexes).
Are there any
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:45:48AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> The fruitiest features are as follows:
Will it automatically install new versions of files where the old one was
not altered? That's my biggest bugbear with mergemaster - it asks you about
a zillion files in /etc/rc.d which you have to
Brian Candler wrote:
That's my biggest bugbear with mergemaster - it asks you about
a zillion files in /etc/rc.d which you have to manually agree to overwrite
just because the RCS ID has changed. In those cases where you've not altered
them yourself, I think you should just get the latest versio
On Friday 30 September 2005 18:12, Brian Candler wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 02:45:48AM +0400, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > The fruitiest features are as follows:
>
> Will it automatically install new versions of files where the old one was
> not altered? That's my biggest bugbear with mergemaster -
On Friday 30 September 2005 18:23, Ashley Moran wrote:
> > It does have problems handling DB files, but that is usually not a big
> > problem to fix.
>
> I read about etcmerge in BSD Hacks and there's been no going back for
> me. It seems pretty stable even though it's not been updated for a good
On Friday 30 September 2005 05:24 am, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> Hi Robert,
> I don't think your patch is correct, the total linked list can be broken
> while the lock is released, thus just passing the link may not be enough
> I have submitted a PR[1] for this a month ago but nobody took care of it
On Thursday 29 September 2005 03:36 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes:
> >On Thursday 29 September 2005 02:14 pm, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >> In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Baldwin writes:
> >> >Actually, you would think that it could be init
On Friday 30 September 2005 07:08 am, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> [Replying to everyone who mentioned etcmerge or 3-way merge in general]
>
> On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:15:59AM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
> > It is worth while to mention sysutils/etcmerge.
> >
> > Having the "three-way" merge makes the process
Daniel O'Connor wrote:
On Friday 30 September 2005 18:23, Ashley Moran wrote:
It sure would be nice :)
One thing would be to have automatically fetched etc directories so when you
ran it for the first time it would grab a release version of etc for you :)
Hmm.. I'll try and add that if I get s
On Friday 30 September 2005 23:50, Ashley Moran wrote:
> Unfortunately it seems that config files for the subsystems (eg SSH) are
> stored separately in the CVS tree and I didn't have time to work out
> where they live.
The trick is to get the system to build you an /etc - see how mergemaster does
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:07:16AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2005 07:08 am, Yar Tikhiy wrote:
> > [Replying to everyone who mentioned etcmerge or 3-way merge in general]
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 12:15:59AM -0700, Jon Dama wrote:
> > > It is worth while to mention sy
Hello list,
I am trying to use a FreeBSD box to log into a Single Board Computer. I
have a null modem and it's plugged to both serial
ports. The SBC runs openbsd ( /dev/cua00).
When I run "cu -l /dev/cuaa0" from FreeBSD, I don't get any login
prompt.
What I am doing wrong?
I've already read t
On 9/30/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 30 September 2005 05:24 am, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> > Hi Robert,
> > I don't think your patch is correct, the total linked list can be broken
>
> > while the lock is released, thus just passing the link may not be enough
> > I have s
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:14:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hello list,
> I am trying to use a FreeBSD box to log into a Single Board Computer. I
> have a null modem and it's plugged to both serial
> ports. The SBC runs openbsd ( /dev/cua00).
> When I run "cu -l /dev/cuaa0" from FreeBSD
Hi,
I am seeing a lot of these messages in my /var/log/messages directory and
cannot understand why:
arplookup 192.168.0.12 failed: could not allocate llinfo
arpresolve: can't allocate llinfo for 192.168.0.12rt
There were more of these messages for two other IPs (one external), but this
is the o
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kernel Dev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hello All. For a project, I am looking into making the em(4) driver use fast
interrupts. Has someone done this or are there other driver references that
could help me in this?
:
: I understand that the main pro
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:14:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
: >
: > Hello list,
: > I am trying to use a FreeBSD box to log into a Single Board Computer. I
: > have a null modem and it's plugged to both
> It is hard to say something not seeing and understanding the
> complete source code.
Well, it's a very simple module :
http://lekernel.lya-fr.com/firmwareagent_en.html
> But since fdinit() which is called from
> fork1() and fdfree() which is called from exit1() get and release
> reference on
On Friday 30 September 2005 12:33 pm, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:14:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> : > Hello list,
> : > I am trying to use a FreeBSD box to log into a Sing
On Friday 30 September 2005 11:25 am, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> On 9/30/05, John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 30 September 2005 05:24 am, Antoine Pelisse wrote:
> > > Hi Robert,
> > > I don't think your patch is correct, the total linked list can be
> > > broken
> > >
> > > while
Thank you all for your replys. My answers are inline:
> : Do you have getty running on that port on the SBC?
yes. It should be running. We have in /etc/ttys (openbsd)
tty00 "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600" dialup on secure
> Do you have all the modem pins connected for this cable?
I got th
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: One thing I've noticed on the FreeBSD (5.4 RELEASE) dmesg is
: sio0: port may not be enabled
:
: I enabled the first serial port in the BIOS, but I still get this.
: Me scratching head now. Anything else I may be missing?
C
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sergey Babkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >From: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
:
: >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: >Brian Reichert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >: On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 05:14:01PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2005, Doug Barton wrote:
Alin-Adrian Anton wrote:
XFS fits incredibly well with Maildir, however this I did not test
practically
I am curious as to what the defaults are for frag, inode, and block sizes on
XFS, and whether that is one of the factors that make it work well
On Fri, Sep 30, 2005 at 09:43:13PM +0200, Vaclav Haisman wrote:
> I don't think that frag, inode and block size is the main factor that makes
> XFS work well in many small files situations. From what I have read about
> XFS I gather that it allocates inodes on demand, that it doesn't have fixed
I'm hacking up sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c, and I've added a sysctl entry,
but it doesn't appear via sysctl -a -c vfs.ufs. Here's what I've done:
--- ufs_vnops.c-origThu Sep 29 20:47:50 2005
+++ ufs_vnops.c Fri Sep 30 13:44:55 2005
@@ -79,6 +79,7 @@
#include
#include
#include
+#include
I'm just putting the finishing touches on a paper that I'll present at
the AUUG 2005 conference (see http://www.auug.org.au/ for details).
The paper is about using FreeBSD to control the fermentation process.
Normally I put a beastie image at the bottom right of the slides (see
http://www.lemis.co
On Fri, 2005-Sep-30 16:51:51 -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
>I'm hacking up sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c, and I've added a sysctl entry,
>but it doesn't appear via sysctl -a -c vfs.ufs. Here's what I've done:
The code looks correct but I can't find a '-c' option to sysctl in
4.x, 5.x or 7.x. Note that
Peter Jeremy wrote:
On Fri, 2005-Sep-30 16:51:51 -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
I'm hacking up sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c, and I've added a sysctl entry,
but it doesn't appear via sysctl -a -c vfs.ufs. Here's what I've done:
The code looks correct but I can't find a '-c' option to sysctl in
4.x,
36 matches
Mail list logo
