Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

2005-07-23 Thread Edwin
comments in-line. Giorgos Keramidas ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > This looks rather strange. ip_fastforward() should pass an mtu of 1500 > but somehow the negative strange value gets passed. It would be > interesting to see the value of ``mtu'' in frame 13 too, if you still > have this crash d

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

2005-07-23 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 23 July 2005 15:53, Edwin wrote: Can we see one complete picture, please. This includes: A trace local vars in ip_fastforward including unfolded ip, m, ro.ro_rt and ifp. local vars in ip_fragment(). Thanks. -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ /

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

2005-07-23 Thread Edwin
Max Laier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Saturday 23 July 2005 15:53, Edwin wrote: > > Can we see one complete picture, please. This includes: > > A trace > local vars in ip_fastforward including unfolded ip, m, ro.ro_rt and ifp. > local vars in ip_fragment(). > > Thanks. > > -- > /"\

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

2005-07-23 Thread Max Laier
On Saturday 23 July 2005 20:41, Edwin wrote: > Kernel name: D1-0722 (for reference) > > mbsd05# kgdb kernel.debug /usr/local/STORAGE/crash/vmcore.5 > #13 0xc06933c1 in ip_fastforward (m=0xc12e6c00) at > /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_fastfwd.c:572 warning: Source file is more recent > than executabl

Re: help w/panic under heavy load - 5.4

2005-07-23 Thread Edwin
Max/et.al., replies to your message in-line below... If I understand correctly...(albeit an overly brief understanding :)) 1. ethernet packet comes in - stuck into an mbuf 2. ether_demux calls ip_fastforward passing the mbuf struct 3. mbuf struct is copied/munged into ip struct by mtod 4. ntohs