Hello,
few days ago, my wife bought me a Medion MIM2050 notebook. At first sight, it
seems to be good but when I tried to install FreeBSD 5.3 using the mini-inst,
it freezed when trying to detect the pci bus. Any idea ? How can I help ?
Fred
PS: I feel guilty... I installed an Ubuntu for the momen
It's not red but it is the PRI_RAID IDE connector. I have the controller set
to IDE in the BIOS so it should act just as any other IDE controller
(according to the manual and many other sources).
I have two hard drives on the primary IDE (not on the controller) and a CD
drive on the secondary IDE
On Wed, Jan 26, 2005 at 12:00:46PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> From: Coleman Kane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OpenBSD's netcat in base or ports?
> To: Avleen Vig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
>
> I agree. I think even tcpdump, libpcap, and ssl stuff should be i
hihi, doug -
thanx for the suggestion - the notion of computing ut just with subtraction is
really good, since it is likely to be the largest of the three values in most
applications, but i'm a little worried that the 1024 multiplications aren't
large enough when tt gets really large - i'll do th
Hello,
few days ago, my wife bought me a Medion MIM2050 notebook. At first
sight, it seems to be good but when I tried to install FreeBSD 5.3 using
the mini-inst, it freezed when trying to detect the pci bus. Any idea ?
How can I help ?
Fred
PS: I feel guilty... I installed an Ubuntu for the momen
hihi, doug -
> Doug Ambrisko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> ...
> The assumption with this calculation is that st & it tend to be
> small compared to tt so the 1024 X shouldn't overflow much.
> ...
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> | ...but i'm a little worried that the 1024 m
But when I do this,
Boot from the Ext2(or Dos) partition with grub
And then use loader from the partition
It says "Can't find kernel/kernel.old"
Then I use the "ls" of loader by "ls "
It says " ' ' is bad path "
what's that??
From: Dan Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello,everybody.
The first ,thank you for you help!
bsd 5.3-release. pci :Realtek RTL8139/810x.adsl /2m
When I follow handbook,/etc/ppp/ppp.conf is ok .it something wrong likes this:
#ppp -ddial adsl
working in ddial mode
using interface:tun0
#ppp -ddial adsl
working in ddial mode
using interfac
Hi,Everybody!
Who can tell me what's the rule of loader's device number?
Whether it's the same as grub's?
For Example,the "disk1s1" is grub's (hd0,0)?
Thanks at all^-^
_
享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统― MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com
_
Hi,Everybody!
Another Question
When I use grub and loader,how can I tell loader to use what loader.rc
file?
For Example:kernel /loader -* /loader.rc
Thanks much
_
享用世界上最大的电子邮件系统― MSN Hotmail。 http://www.hotmail.com
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 05:36:52PM +0100, S?ren Schmidt wrote:
>
> Seems I lost my lonely ATAPI CDROM with built in changer to the eternal
> HW scrapyards, let it rest in peace :)
>
> Finding a new one seems difficult so I thought I'd ask around how many
> still has one of these ?
>
> I ask be
Hi,
I have a kernel module with the following entry point :
static int test_modevent(module_t mod, int type, void *unused)
{
int s;
unsigned char *p = NULL;
unsigned char v = 0x55;
switch (type)
{
case MOD_LOAD:
p = (unsigned char *)ip_output;
s = splhigh();
v = p[
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a kernel module with the following entry point :
>
> static int test_modevent(module_t mod, int type, void *unused)
> {
>int s;
>unsigned char *p = NULL;
>unsigned char v = 0x55;
>
>switch (type)
> {
> case MOD
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a kernel module with the following entry point :
>
> static int test_modevent(module_t mod, int type, void *unused)
> {
> int s;
> unsigned char *p = NULL;
> unsigned char v = 0x55;
>
> switch (type)
> {
> case MOD_LOAD
Hi,
Yes, I am trying to patch a piece of code in the kernel. The strange
thing is that this code works without a problem on FreeBSD 4.8 - has
the VM system changed to such an extent between 4.8 and 4.9 that the
pages in the kernel code segment are not writeable anymore?
Thanks for the bit about t
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 11:45:33AM +0800, qq qq wrote:
> Hello,everybody.
> The first ,thank you for you help!
> bsd 5.3-release. pci :Realtek RTL8139/810x.adsl /2m
> When I follow handbook,/etc/ppp/ppp.conf is ok .it something wrong likes this:
>
> #ppp -ddial adsl
> working in ddial mode
> usin
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am trying to patch a piece of code in the kernel. The strange
> thing is that this code works without a problem on FreeBSD 4.8 - has
> the VM system changed to such an extent between 4.8 and 4.9 that the
> pages in the kernel code segmen
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 06:48:56PM +0200, Jacques Fourie wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Yes, I am trying to patch a piece of code in the kernel. The strange
> thing is that this code works without a problem on FreeBSD 4.8 - has
> the VM system changed to such an extent between 4.8 and 4.9 that the
> pages in th
Thanks for the reply - I really appreciate it. I have tried to change
the protection on the page in a way similar to mprotect() but no luck.
I have had a look at what ddb does when modifying kernel code and
after applying the same ideas to my code everything works without a
problem.
The funny thin
19 matches
Mail list logo