Hello hackers!
Today I upgraded my 5.2.1-p11 box up to 5.3-p2.
My firewall rules includes like this:
...
/sbin/ipfw add tee 1 ip from 1.2.3.4 to 4.3.2.1
...
On 5.2.1-FreeBSD it's works fine.
But FreeBSD 5.3 halted each time!!!
After changed "tee 1" to "allow" now works all fine.
Is this
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 08:08 -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> --- Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have a desire to fix posix semaphores in at least
> > 5.3. The current
> > implementation doesn't actually follow the "spirit"
> > of the standard,
> > even though it technically qualifie
I just spent three days trying various source trees and kernel configs
down a bug. My bad - I should have checked the bugs database first. My
second query turned up kern/71130, which contains a patch that fixes
the compilation problem I was having.
I can confirm that it works as advertised.
Now,
Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
Hello hackers!
Today I upgraded my 5.2.1-p11 box up to 5.3-p2.
My firewall rules includes like this:
...
/sbin/ipfw add tee 1 ip from 1.2.3.4 to 4.3.2.1
...
On 5.2.1-FreeBSD it's works fine.
But FreeBSD 5.3 halted each time!!!
After changed "tee 1" to "allow" now
On Wed, 15 Dec 2004, 17:00+0500, Dmitry A. Bondareff wrote:
> Hello hackers!
>
> Today I upgraded my 5.2.1-p11 box up to 5.3-p2.
> My firewall rules includes like this:
> ...
> /sbin/ipfw add tee 1 ip from 1.2.3.4 to 4.3.2.1
> ...
> On 5.2.1-FreeBSD it's works fine.
> But FreeBSD 5.3 halted ea
On Tue, Dec 14, 2004 at 07:55:35PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote:
> I just spent three days trying various source trees and kernel configs
> down a bug. My bad - I should have checked the bugs database first. My
> second query turned up kern/71130, which contains a patch that fixes
> the compilation pro
I'm trying to access an assembler CPU instructions from within a normal
.c file and function. Unfortunatly I have no idea how this works.
If you know how to do this please contact me directly. Any help appreciated.
--
Andre
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing
Hi !
I am new to bsd internals and was looking at the implementation of syscall
in sys/i386/i386/trap.c
here its seems we get the handler for the syscall by
if (p->p_sysent->sv_mask)
code &= p->p_sysent->sv_mask;
if (code >= p->p_sysent->sv_size)
callp = &p
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 03:09:23PM +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> I'm trying to access an assembler CPU instructions from within a normal
> .c file and function. Unfortunatly I have no idea how this works.
>
> If you know how to do this please contact me directly. Any help
> appreciated.
>
fi
On Friday 10 December 2004 09:32 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm sorry for typing this mail for the third time, I'm not sure if the
> other mails did reach the list. The domain I was using to send emails has
> just expired. Please cc me, as I'm not subscribed to the list with this
> emai
--- Andrey Simonenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:19:05PM +0530, Ravi
> Krishna wrote:
>
> > My question is why we store the
> p->p_sysent->sv_table
> > for each process. What is the reason for keeping
> this per process?
> > Are there some situations where two process
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 07:56:53AM -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
>
> --- Andrey Simonenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:19:05PM +0530, Ravi
> > Krishna wrote:
> >
> > > My question is why we store the
> > p->p_sysent->sv_table
> > > for each process. What is the r
Hello all, for a project I am trying to figure out how to boot a FreeBSD kernel
loaded at any physical address. Right now the locore.s magic works because the
load addres (KERNLOAD) and (KERNBASE) are set such that
#define R(foo) ((foo)-KERNBASE)
macro is able to get the addresses before paging
I think this might be somewhat off topic, but to support superpages you
probably want kernel to be aligned on 4MB boundary.
Also, Mach had macros for alignment. I browsed code and it seems there are
macros in i386/include/asmacros.h
Perhaps I am missing something, but I don't see why would you w
Peter Jeremy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2004-Dec-15 15:09:23 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
> >I'm trying to access an assembler CPU instructions from within a normal
> >.c file and function. Unfortunatly I have no idea how this works.
>
> info gcc "c ext" ext
>
> You might also find the relevant /usr/s
Hey,
After adding KDB, KDB_UNATTENDED and DDB, two of my 5.3-STABLE servers
never came back after a reboot. After talking to the datacenter, they
informed me these servers are trying to boot of /kernel and not
/boot/kernel/kernel ..
What might be causing this behaviour ? /kernel was 4.X and these
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 11:39:39AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey,
>
> After adding KDB, KDB_UNATTENDED and DDB, two of my 5.3-STABLE servers
> never came back after a reboot. After talking to the datacenter, they
> informed me these servers are trying to boot of /kernel and not
> /boot/ker
Sort of off topic, but thought people here would be interested.
MCI contacted me today because one of my systems is doing ssh logins
(failed) to a box they have no right ssh-ing into. After some packet
analysis, its clear that something is inside my network. The only solid
evidence I have is a mac
Hmm... Interesting.
What if I try to redirect the output of tcpdump to a file. I am doing this
on a f5 BigIP which sort of runs a "FreeBSD-ish" kernel.
I've tried:
tcpdump -i exp1 port ssh | grep -v '63.123' | grep -v 'lb01'
>/var/ssh.capture
But it never rights to the file. The above will capt
Yes! Rights! The server freezes! No core dumped!!
And I connected by console, not by network.
Dmitry.
- Original Message -
From: "Maxim Konovalov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Dmitry A. Bondareff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 15, 2004 6:42 PM
Subject:
let me start by a local saying:
Q- What's a camel
A- It's a horse designed by a committee.
BTW, the camel is a very efficient piece of equipment.
If I would plan a 24/7 life support system I would not use iSCSI.
(having to rely on packets traveling the Internet, DOS, etc, is not go
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 10:11 -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
> --- Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > BTW -how would
> > > you deal with a diskless workstation running
> > Freebsd?
> >
> > Why does this matter? If the system uses NFS, then
> > all bets are off.
> > If the system contains a
Mbuf clusters can easily be allocated from their own pool, but I guess
you're probably right about various bits of incidental memory
allocation.
-Kip
-Original Message-
From: Scott M. Ferris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 200
On 2004-12-14 12:29, Amandeep Pannu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have 12WD 200GB SATA drives with RAID5 and glabal spare on 3ware 9000
> series controller. Also one 80GB SATA drive for OS.
> I had to manually compile the twa driver. kldload twa. The system started
> recognizing the controller and
I am new to this big arrays. FreeBSD 5.2.1 doesnt see all the 2.2TB.
So am I, and I had the same problem recently. I used 5.3-Stable as of a
couple of weeks ago so YMMV, but...
GEOM: create disk da0 dp=0xc832fc50
da0 at twa0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: <3ware Logical Disk 00 1.00> Fixed Direct Acc
On Wed, Dec 15, 2004 at 08:19:05PM +0530, Ravi Krishna wrote:
> My question is why we store the p->p_sysent->sv_table
> for each process. What is the reason for keeping this per process?
> Are there some situations where two processes can have different system calls
> available?
Processes can hav
On Wed, 2004-Dec-15 15:09:23 +0100, Andre Oppermann wrote:
>I'm trying to access an assembler CPU instructions from within a normal
>.c file and function. Unfortunatly I have no idea how this works.
info gcc "c ext" ext
You might also find the relevant /usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/*/*.md useful.
Has anyone looked at modifying dump/restore to support:
1) Dumping onto DVDs (sending the appropriate "close volume" command)
2) Compressed multi-volume dumps
This means monitoring the compressed data stream and flushing the
compress engine state at the end of each volume (so that each volume
John Baldwin wrote:
There is a problem in the kernel that causes with 3 or more processors
(including logical CPUs from HTT). Disabling HTT in the BIOS is probably
your best bet as it will get you down to 2 CPUs which should work much
better. HTT also isn't but so useful anyways for most workl
Joe Kelsey wrote:
On Tue, 2004-12-14 at 10:11 -0800, Kamal R. Prasad wrote:
--- Joe Kelsey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW -how would
you deal with a diskless workstation running
Freebsd?
Why does this matter? If the system uses NFS, then
all bets are off.
If the system contains a
Hi all,
Thanks all for your replies. I installed 5.3 which saw the whole 2.2TB in
sysinstall then I made two slices and mounted them.
Everything worked fine.
Thanks again.
Kudos to 5.3
Aman
>> I am new to this big arrays. FreeBSD 5.2.1 doesnt see all the 2.2TB.
> So am I, and I had the same probl
Colleagues,
in releaselog I found the following warning:
cvs checkout: duplicate key found for `cut' at line 2585 of
`/FreeBSD/ncvs/CVSROOT/modules'
looking further...
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/FreeBSD/CVSROOT> cvs ann modules | grep '[^a-z]cut[^a-z]'
Annotations for modules
***
1.2
I have a question concerning the use of malloc to allocate small amounts
of memory for packet wrappers for certain packets.
Basically, I'm using malloc in much the same way as one would use it in
a standard userland program: allocating small chunks and freeing them
again a short(ish) time later.
A
On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 04:39:27AM +0300, Kenny Chamber wrote:
> I have a question concerning the use of malloc to allocate small amounts
> of memory for packet wrappers for certain packets.
> Basically, I'm using malloc in much the same way as one would use it in
> a standard userland program: all
34 matches
Mail list logo
