Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Justin Hopper
Two questions: 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multiple IP patch in a semi-production environment? Can anyone report any problems or issues that they've had with it? Thank

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Aaron Glenn
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Two questions: > > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? Someone hasn't read up on 5.x... > 2) Has anyone used Pawel's multi

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Justin Hopper
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Two questions: > > > > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? >

Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?)

2004-12-08 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! +> > +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it +> > soon. +> +> Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? I'm going to MFC it probably this wee

Re: mmap()

2004-12-08 Thread John-Mark Gurney
Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 10:45 +0530: > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > >On Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 02:19:19PM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote.. > > > >>Kamal R. Prasad wrote this message on Tue, Dec 07, 2004 at 22:21 +0530: > >> > >>>There was a bug in my interface routine wh

Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?)

2004-12-08 Thread Alexandr Kovalenko
Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:53:06AM +0100, you wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: > +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! > +> > > +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it > +> > soon. > +> > +> An

Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD

2004-12-08 Thread Vladimir Terziev
Hi Jeremie, I've managed to build UCARP binary on FreeBSD 4.x without any problem. Now i have to test it how good it works. Vladimir On Tue, 7 Dec 2004 22:45:54 +0100 Jeremie Le Hen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > i need to implement gateway redundancy for our server farm. I

Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement

2004-12-08 Thread Massimiliano Stucchi
On 071204, 18:52, Matteo Riondato wrote: > Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto: > > The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI > > was not to my taste. > > > > -I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. > > And still very usable. It's my only choise. >

Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?)

2004-12-08 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 11:40:44AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: +> > +> To be on original topic - is there any way to make a mirror from live +> > +> system? I mean I have running FreeBSD on da0 and I want to make a +> > +> gmirror on it (I'm planning to add second drive soon). How to avoid +>

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Justin Hopper wrote: On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Two questions: 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? Som

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Chris Howells
On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote: > 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails > binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? 'ifconfig alias' -- Cheers, Chris Howells -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] Web: http://chrishowell

Re: finding and mounting a fat partition

2004-12-08 Thread Mike Meyer
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Bagus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> typed: > > Hi, > > When I built my box, I split the disk into two partitions, one 8 gig > partition for freebsd and one 2 gig fat one in case I ever wanted to change > my mind and install a different operating system on the box. Of course, I've >

Re: OpenCVS

2004-12-08 Thread Jordan Hubbard
One might also ask the begged question, namely whether or not it makes any sense to invest time and effort into a transition to just another implementation of cvs vs investing it in moving to something else, like SVN. No, I'm really not trying to re-ignite the "should we move to p4/svn/arch/..

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Chris Howells wrote: On Wednesday 08 December 2004 08:23, Justin Hopper wrote: 1) Is there any formal plans to incorporate the functionality of jails binding multiple IPs into the FreeBSD base any time soon? 'ifconfig alias' Please, people, read his question. Into JAILS. When you attempt to add a

Re: Hand on gmirror (Was: Re: gmirror bugs, how many?)

2004-12-08 Thread =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o_Carlos_Mendes_Lu=EDs?=
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 02:10:02AM +0200, Alexandr Kovalenko wrote: +> Hello, Pawel Jakub Dawidek! +> > +> > This is known race, which is already fixed in HEAD. I want to commit it +> > soon. +> +> Any plans on backporting it to RELENG_5 (RELENG_5_3 maybe?)? I'm going

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Justin Hopper
On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 11:51 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell wrote: > Justin Hopper wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-12-08 at 00:26 -0800, Aaron Glenn wrote: > > > >>On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 00:23:24 -0800, Justin Hopper > >><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>>Two questions: > >>> > >>>1) Is there any formal plans to in

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Devon H. O'Dell
Justin Hopper wrote: [snip] Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this functionality into the base system. It's really not a prob

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Aaron Glenn
On Wed, 08 Dec 2004 11:51:10 +0100, Devon H. O'Dell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Justin Hopper wrote: > Correct. 5.x does not have this feature; Aaron, please read for yourself > before you are rude towards others. Turn's out *I* missed something. I'd have sworn up and down 5.3's jail implementat

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: +> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll +> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK +> or somebody else @freebsd will respond with any plans to roll this +> functionalit

Re: FreeSBIE 1.1 Release Announcement

2004-12-08 Thread Julian Elischer
Massimiliano Stucchi wrote: On 071204, 18:52, Matteo Riondato wrote: Il giorno Mar, 07-12-2004 alle 17:22 +0200, Erik Udo ha scritto: The last time i checked, FreeSBIE GUI was not to my taste. -I rather use IceWM as my Window Manager, it is small and fast. And still very usable. It's my on

Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD

2004-12-08 Thread Bruce M Simpson
On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 01:02:09PM -0600, Scott M. Ferris wrote: > ucarp will compile and run, but will silently fail to send heartbeats > due to the way libpcap > opens bpf on FreeBSD. You can find a patch to libpcap in PR 72814. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=72814 This is some

Re: Multiple IPs in jail

2004-12-08 Thread Justin Hopper
On Thu, 2004-12-09 at 01:42 +0100, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Wed, Dec 08, 2004 at 09:51:31AM -0800, Justin Hopper wrote: > +> Thanks for understanding my question, Devon. I guess at this point I'll > +> patch a system here and begin testing with it, and hopefully PJD or PHK > +> or somebody

Re: UCARP support for FreeBSD

2004-12-08 Thread Jeremie Le Hen
> This is something else which needs a pcap/tcpdump update. Currently there > is no way to specify this behaviour at runtime. > > Hopefully this should be resolved at the next import. Do you know when it is scheduled ? -- Jeremie Le Hen [EMAIL PROTECTED]