On Sunday 09 May 2004 03:40 pm, Don Lewis wrote:
> Typically the proper fix in this case would be to remove the
> sb_lock() call from sb_reset_dsp() and always let the caller do the
> locking. The patch below should do the trick, though I believe the
> added locking and unlocking (the second secti
On Mon, 10 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote:
> On Monday 10 May 2004 12:31, you wrote:
> > On Sun, 9 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote:
> > > Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET,
> > > (tcpdump show this:
> > > 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCA
All,
It's time again for bi-monthly status reports. As always, the
template is at http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml.
Please make submissions to [EMAIL PROTECTED] by May 12 for
inclusion. Any projects that relate to FreeBSD development,
documentation, ports, etc, are welcome.
On Monday 10 May 2004 12:31, you wrote:
> On Sun, 9 May 2004, TSaplin Mikhail wrote:
> > Recently I wrote, that I have litle traffic to GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET,
> > (tcpdump show this:
> > 20:32:41.496039 129dial.supernet.kz.52075 > GATEKEEPER.MCAST.NET.1718:
> > udp 31 )
> >
> > David Malone <[EMAIL
4 matches
Mail list logo