Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Helge Oldach
M. Warner Losh: >I'm contemplating a binary distribution system for some systems that I >have. I'm ignoring kernel updates for the moment, and concentrating >on userland deployment. > >I'm thinking of doing something like: > >make buildworld >make installworld DESTDIR=/big/disk/freebsd/image >make

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 07:41:51AM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: > At 09:19 20/10/2003 +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote: > >On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 10:16:54AM -1000, Clifton Royston wrote: > >> In our case we have already built a simple framework for > >> distributing FreeBSD binary packages built with

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Helge Oldach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus my personal : preference for updating machines is making installworld on a file system : exported by the build server. I'm looking for ways to avoid having N

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Helge Oldach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >: Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus my personal >: preference for updating machines is making installworld on a file system >: exporte

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, Peter Pentchev wrote: [snip] PP> > > make buildworld PP> > > make installworld DESTDIR=/big/disk/freebsd/image PP> > > make mergemaster -D /big/disk/freebsd/mergemaster PP> > > PP> > > And then on each machine I want to update I'd do something like: PP> > > PP> > > sudo rsync

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: MWL> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MWL> Helge Oldach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: MWL> : Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus my personal MWL> : preference for updating machines is making installworld on a file system MWL> :

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Colin Percival
At 13:42 20/10/2003 +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: Nope, because: - security/freebsd-update does not handle ports at all - it is only for security branches and so does not fit in the case of locally patched system Local patches aren't a problem, actually -- regardless of what I may advertise, F

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dmitry Morozovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: : : MWL> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : MWL> Helge Oldach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : MWL> : Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus

Re: rsync vs installworld

2003-10-20 Thread Dmitry Morozovsky
On Mon, 20 Oct 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: MWL> : MWL> : Rsync doesn't deal with file flags (chflags(2)). Thus my personal MWL> : MWL> : preference for updating machines is making installworld on a file system MWL> : MWL> : exported by the build server. MWL> : MWL> MWL> : MWL> I'm looking for ways

Panic in -CURRENT setting up fxp0 or wi0

2003-10-20 Thread Daniel Lang
Hi, I'd though I draw the attention of -hackers to http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=58139 maybe someone has some idea what's going wrong in the interrupt handler. TIA, Daniel -- IRCnet: Mr-Spock - Der Zweite Platz ist Dreck - Daniel Lang * [EMAIL PROTECTED]

nfs unlink confusion.

2003-10-20 Thread Matthew A Kolb
I am having an anurism over this. Trying to opendir, readdir and unlink files in a directory over nfs (with fbsd-current client and a variety of nfs servers (netapp, linux fbsd) seems to produce unexpected results. if i run this code: #include #include #include #include int main(void) {

RE: building sshd

2003-10-20 Thread Adil Katchi
Has anyone tried making sshd? I ran src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile and this is the error I got: auth1.o: In function `do_authloop': /d2/akatchi/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/../../../crypto/openssh/auth1.c:121: undefi ned reference to `abandon_challenge_response' *** Error code 1 Thanks, Adil --

Re: building sshd

2003-10-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 12:51:17PM -0400, Adil Katchi wrote: > Has anyone tried making sshd? I ran src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/Makefile and > this is the error I got: > > auth1.o: In function `do_authloop': > /d2/akatchi/src/secure/usr.sbin/sshd/../../../crypto/openssh/auth1.c:121: > undefi > ned re

process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD

2003-10-20 Thread Kip Macy
At BSDCon '03 it was mentioned that a process checkpoint / restore facility would be a useful addition to FreeBSD. This post is to announce that Matt and I have added such a facility to DragonFly BSD. It is noteworthy for -hackers as anyone who is interested could still port it with relative ease.

modified files for: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD

2003-10-20 Thread Kip Macy
The impacted files are in the directories sys/checkpt and usr.bin/checkpt as well as sys/kern/imgact_elf.c and sys/kern/kern_fp.c. -Kip ___ [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-h

Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD

2003-10-20 Thread Sam Leffler
I've lived through several checkpointing implementations. You've got the easy part. Applications must participate or such a facility has very limited usefulness. Delivering a signal is only part of the problem; there tend to be issues synchronizing user-mode checkpoint of application state wi

Re: process checkpoint restore facility now in DragonFly BSD

2003-10-20 Thread Matthew Dillon
:I've lived through several checkpointing implementations. You've got the easy :part. Applications must participate or such a facility has very limited :usefulness. Delivering a signal is only part of the problem; there tend to :be issues synchronizing user-mode checkpoint of application stat