Hello to all. Sorry if this is a little terse, but a production machine is down
and I'm very tired.
Our mailserver (running 4.5-STABLE) died today, due to massive read errros
from /dev/sd0s1a -- the root partition.
I figured we'd just replace the primary drive and all would be well.
I put the s
I have read the perfmon documentation and source code. For several
reasons, I do not think it is totally adequate in my situation.
This is an extension to the i386_vm86() syscall which will let you turn
PCE on and off if you're the superuser.
Now that I think on this a bit more, a sysctl might be
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> Now that I think on this a bit more, a sysctl might be a better place to
> put this, but it seemed to belong with the i386_vm86() bits, rather than
> polluting initcpu.c right away.
The important thing is to allow the kernel to intermediate and
control allocation of counte
Since the memory content will be kept across suspension,
I guess there is no need for da to take special care.
Just like what ad does.
The actual suspend/resume method is for ata-pci.
For hardware devices to come back to previous state,
the correct place may be in SCSI HBA driver like ahc, sym, etc
Greetings,
pam_opieaccess.so is documented to allow cleartext password (by
returning PAM_SUCCESS) when OPIE is disabled for the user.
However, on both -current and 4-stable, pam_opieaccess.so checks whether
OPIE is enabled only by checking the existence of the user's record from
/etc/opiekeys.
After upgrading my 2 Sendmail servers to 4.6.2-p23 last week I ran into
an amazing issue sending mail to hotmail.com and msn.com addresses.
I noticed it because of the large queue for those domains building up
daily. In the process of troubleshooting I noticed massive [bad tcp
cksum] messages in
What NIC?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
> Which is which?
The 2 boxes that didn't work, one had a Fiber EM and the other had a
copper BGE running at 100 full (Dell 1650 and 2550 respectively)
The 4.9-pre is a Fiber EM (dell 2600).
> Which one was causing large amount of checksum errors?
Both of the 4.6.2 boxes.
> Which one fixed it
On Tuesday 16 September 2003 04:47 pm, Mike Durian wrote:
> I'm trying to implement a serial protocol that is timing sensitive.
> I'm noticing things like drains and reads and blocking until the
> next kernel tick. I believe this is due to the lbolt sleeps
> in the tty.c code.
Following up on my
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 02:57:03PM +0200, Grumble wrote:
> Is vm86 related to virtual-8086 mode? Probably not... What does vm86
> stand for? Virtual machine?
vm86 is something of a catchall for vm86-related functions. One of the
things it implements is a means of getting in and out of Virtual 808
Bruce M Simpson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 01, 2003 at 11:39:36AM +0200, Grumble wrote:
> > >>However, I am not allowed to use the RDPMC instruction from ring 3
> > >>because the PCE (Performance-monitoring Counters Enable) bit is not set.
> > >
> > >You can do it with /dev/perfmon. man 4 perfmon.
> >
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
