Re: ucom not in MAKEDEV in 4.8-STABLE

2003-08-08 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 11:05:30AM +1000, JacobRhoden wrote: > Hi People, > > I was wondering, is there a reason why the 4.8-STABLE version of MAKEDEV does > not have the ability to generate ucom. (I was wondering because I have to > back port a bit of code on every machine I want to do it on).

Re: BSD make question

2003-08-08 Thread Andrew Gallatin
Ruslan Ermilov writes: > On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > > > Using BSD make, how can I apply different rules based on different > > directories while using only a single makefile? > > > There's a .CURDIR variable that can be used to conditionalize > pa

Re: How to get a device_t

2003-08-08 Thread John Birrell
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 09:44:08AM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes > : > > >I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the > >device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in STABLE) as Bernd says. > >I traced the boot on

panic during nfs operations in 4.8S on Dell 2650

2003-08-08 Thread Mark Powell
Hi, We've recently got a couple of Dell Poweredge 2650's with 2x2.8GHz Xeons, 4GB RAM, PERC 3/Di (aac) RAID controller. They are mounting a 700GB fs over NFS from a NetAPP. They are connected to a Cisco 3550-12T gigabit over copper switch. I tried them first on the intel em cards and they panicke

Re: small statistics tool in the tree ?

2003-08-08 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Poul-Henning Kamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The program is a <500 line .c program and I was wondering if it belongs > in the tree so we have an easy to use tool to point people at when they > run benchmarks. Just put it in src/tools/tools/... DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] __

Re: How to get a device_t

2003-08-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Aug-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes >: > >>I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the >>device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in STABLE) as Bernd says. >>I traced the boot on my system and the MMCR is ini

Re: possible deadlocks?

2003-08-08 Thread David Schultz
On Wed, Aug 06, 2003, Ted Unangst wrote: > My advisor Dawson Engler has written a deadlock detector, and we'd like > some verification. They look like bugs, unless there is some other reason > why two call chains cannot happen at the same time. Cool! Is this a new checker for Metal? Is there a c

Re: BSD make question

2003-08-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 02:42:30PM -0400, Andrew Gallatin wrote: > > Using BSD make, how can I apply different rules based on different > directories while using only a single makefile? > There's a .CURDIR variable that can be used to conditionalize parts of a makefile. > Ie, the appended Makefi

Re: How to get a device_t

2003-08-08 Thread Bernd Walter
On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 08-Aug-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes > >: > > > >>I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the > >>device_t parent to nexus_pcib_is_host_bridge (in

Re: How to get a device_t

2003-08-08 Thread John Baldwin
On 08-Aug-2003 Bernd Walter wrote: > On Fri, Aug 08, 2003 at 02:27:30PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote: >> >> On 08-Aug-2003 Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Birrell writes >> >: >> > >> >>I'm not convinced that any hacking is required other than passing the >> >>dev

Re: sysctl kern.ipc.shm* description ?

2003-08-08 Thread Ruslan Ermilov
On Thu, Aug 07, 2003 at 09:11:44PM -0700, bruno schwander wrote: > Is there a good explanation of what those variables are and the > dangers/advantages of changing them ? > Look for the SHM* options descriptions in the /sys/conf/NOTES file (assuming you're running 5.x), or /sys/i386/conf/LINT on 4