RFC: Adding a new (safer) data entry function to libdialog

2003-01-20 Thread Miguel Mendez
Hello hackers, Currently, when one wants the user to enter data in a libdialog based program, one uses the following function: int dialog_inputbox(unsigned char *title, unsigned char *prompt, int height, int width, unsigned char *result); The problem this routine has, i

Re: nswap

2003-01-20 Thread Mark Santcroos
On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:27:29PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > Thus spake Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > in : > > extern int nswap; /* size of swap space */ > > > > in : > > static int nswap; /* first block after the interleaved devs */ > > > > Is the extern pointing to this variab

Re: verbose device probing ?

2003-01-20 Thread Bruce A. Mah
If memory serves me right, Arun Sharma wrote: > BTW: There seem to be 30+ critical + 130+ serious bugs against 5.0 at > the time of its release. Are developers looking at the gnats db at all ? Yes. Bruce. PS. I personally ignore the severity and priority fields of PRs. The importance of many

Re: nswap

2003-01-20 Thread David Schultz
Thus spake Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Fri, Jan 17, 2003 at 03:27:29PM -0800, David Schultz wrote: > > Thus spake Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > in : > > > extern int nswap; /* size of swap space */ > > > > > > in : > > > static int nswap; /* first block after the inter

Re: RFC: Adding a new (safer) data entry function to libdialog

2003-01-20 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 12:18:51PM +0100, Miguel Mendez wrote: > Hello hackers, > > Currently, when one wants the user to enter data in a libdialog based > program, one uses the following function: > > int > dialog_inputbox(unsigned char *title, unsigned char *prompt, > in

Re: verbose device probing ?

2003-01-20 Thread Arun Sharma
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 08:33:09AM -0800, Bruce A. Mah wrote: > > PS. I personally ignore the severity and priority fields of PRs. The > importance of many PRs I've dealt with is very much inflated. > Perhaps you should change the severity field to a lower level then ? Or is there a different

device probing not verbose when using boot -v

2003-01-20 Thread Arun Sharma
>Submitter-Id: current-users >Originator:Arun Sharma >Organization: >Confidential: no >Synopsis: device probing not verbose when using boot -v >Severity: >Priority: >Category: kern >Class: sw-bug >Release: FreeBSD 5.0 i386 >Environment: When FreeBSD ha