On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:55:48PM +, lemon wrote:
> hi,
>
> i have a 4.7-STABLE box running two nameservers: a djbdns dnscache on
> 127.0.0.1 to serve local requests, and have recently added a djbdns
> tinydns on my external address to serve domains i host, viz:
>
> $ sockstat -4 | grep :53
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:55:48PM +, lemon wrote:
# tcpdump -ni lo0
tcpdump: listening on lo0
[ 'wrong' listener being contacted ]
18:02:38.448117 192.168.1.2.1226 > 192.168.1.2.53:
24805+ PTR? 7.57.192.80.in-addr.arpa. (42)
18:02:43.452867 192.168.1.2.1227 > 192
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:32:57PM +, lemon wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> >On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 12:55:48PM +, lemon wrote:
> >
> >>
> >># tcpdump -ni lo0
> >>tcpdump: listening on lo0
> >>
> >>[ 'wrong' listener being contacted ]
> >>
> >>18:02:38.448117 192.168.1.2.1226 > 192.168.1.2
Peter Pentchev wrote:
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 12:32:57PM +, lemon wrote:
Peter Pentchev wrote:
Can you post the full configuration of the tinydns and dnscache
services, e.g. using Jonathan de Boyne Pollard's tinydns-showctl and
dnscache-showctl utilities, available from
http://homepages.te
Thus spake Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 03:02:18PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> +> This is a much larger problem than you make it out to be.
>
> Yes, right, using vnodes is bad idea, sorry.
>
> I'll describe my problem precisely.
> I'm writing kld module whe
On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 05:31:03PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>
>http://www.FreeBSD.org/new/status/report-sample.xml
This should be http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml
-gordon
msg39047/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Incident Information:-
Database: d:/notes/data/mail2.box
Originator: hackers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Here to find out more!
Date/Time: 01/06/2003 11:35:41 AM
The file attachment bgcolor.exe you sent to the recipients listed above was
inf
All of that sounds great!
I got the network setup at home to get -CURRENT downloadeded, but I might just
do it once I get back to school (next Monday) where I have higher connection
speeds.
For now though, I can certainly take a look at several man pages, print them
out and such.
I'll try to
Hi !
Trying to backup my own files from one fat32 partition to
another fat32 partition. After 4 GB gzip complains, that
filesize is too large.
What's the max filesize of files on fat32 / ufs filesystems ??
Andreas ///
--
Andreas Klemm /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 12:48 PM
> Oh, and you were right, the problem supposedly exists somewhere in the
glibc
> libraries. I haven't taken a personal look yet, but supposedly dlopen()
causes
> problems when called if the calling program isn't statically linked to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I doubt that all the packets are sent from one real IP. But, I tnink,
> it may be possible to determine the IP of an attacker, because it's
> not just a DoS attack. He may use other methods later. I am almost
> sure he tried to scan ports earlier, probably with `nmap -v -
! > Background: This environment should be configured to use
! > an internet connection for internet-relevant things, but to
! > work flawlessly without such a connection as long as matters
! > do concern only systems within the LAN.
!
! This is called a "split horizon DNS", and you need to run tw
In the last episode (Jan 06), Andreas Klemm said:
> Trying to backup my own files from one fat32 partition to another
> fat32 partition. After 4 GB gzip complains, that filesize is too
> large.
>
> What's the max filesize of files on fat32 / ufs filesystems ??
Fat32 filesystems have a 4gb limit.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 08:37:23AM -0800, David Schultz wrote:
+> You still haven't explained exactly what you're trying to do, but
+> you may wish to look into Niels Provos' Systrace. It should give
+> you a good example of how to do system call interposition in the
+> kernel, and it has been por
Hello, I just noticed in the advisory (FreeBSD-SA-02:44.filedesc) that the
patch has only been verified for 4.6 and 4.7.
Hs anyone used it on 4.5 ? If not, can anyone comment on the chances it
will apply and work on 4.5 ?
thanks.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscrib
Peter Much wrote:
> ! I have been told that BIND 9 can solve this problem with two
> ! different "views"; however, I do not believe it. I wrote a
> ! BCP RFC for this, which ended up not getting published, as I
> ! did not push it on the promise that the views would solve the
> ! problem, and arri
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
[ ... obtaining file names from open file instances ... ]
> But as You can see, now, if I want to get functionaly what I want,
> I need to be _very_ nasty (and evil of course):)
There are a lot of bad reasons to do this, and a few good reasons,
most of which are really
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Not always is chance to operate only on vnodes. When You (for example)
> want to denied mode changes for some file, You can do this through catching
> chmod(2), but when someone open this file how You get file name when You want
> create policy rules for fchmod(2)? Reme
Thus spake Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> +> It sounds like you're trying to do something complicated with
> +> chdir, and that could make things harder. First of all, you
> +> should be comparing vnodes instead of pathnames when possible, in
> +> order to avoid canonicalization bugs.
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 03:53:38PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
+> If this were my job to do, I would either take the approach of
+> changing how hard links and vmobject_t references are implemented,
+> or I would disallow hard links, and add a "parent inode" field in
+> one of the spare fields in e
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> from vnode was mistake). That's why I think that there should be some
> caching mechanism that should remember file name of every opened file,
> name of executable and working directory.
>
> Example rules:
I vaguely remember that Linux keeps teh
On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 04:58:16PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote:
+> >We want to permit those operations:
+> >- opening file /etc/master.passwd for read only,
+> >- opening files that match to /tmp/temp.* for write,
+> >- changing mode of files /tmp/temp.* to '0666', BUT via fchmod(
Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
> Yes, I know that (sugestion of getting file names (not directory names only)
> from vnode was mistake). That's why I think that there should be some
> caching mechanism that should remember file name of every opened file,
> name of executable and working directory.
You
From: Peter Wemm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It is up to the file system to get it right. The normal procedure is to
use namei() which does VOP_LOOKUP() calls to each file system. As a side
effect of doing a lookup, the file system itself returns a "new" vnode
pointer that corresponds to the name being l
Julian Elischer wrote:
> I vaguely remember that Linux keeps teh path used aroud on openned file
> descriptors some how but I don't remember the details.
It stores the path reference in the per process open file table,
if you insist that it do so. Then it does a huge amount of work
to carry it ar
David Schultz wrote:
> Thus spake Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm not sure what you mean by ``temporary names''. Do you mean
> that your policy specification permits wildcards in any pathname
> component? In that case, you might have to hack the lookup
> routines to point to all th
26 matches
Mail list logo
