Hello,
> Also, I believe you have used the implementation from wpaul's website.
Nope, it was the in-tree one, but I also tried the one from wpaul's
site...
Thanks for the fix!
--[ Free Software ISOs - http://www.fsn.hu/?f=download ]--
Attila Nagy
Hi all,
I've recently had the pleasure of configuring a FreeBSD machine as a
Samba Primary Domain Controller. In smb.conf, one can specify an "add
user script" directive to automate the creation of machine accounts.
Otherwise, you have to manually create accounts for each machine on
the network.
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote:
> Problem is, smb requires a '$' at the end of the username, which our
> pw(8) doesn't allow.
The same patch which you proposed was suggested on the freebsd-current list.
See the thread "pw_user.c change for samba":
http://docs.freebs
Craig Rodrigues wrote to Ryan Thompson:
> On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote:
>
> > Problem is, smb requires a '$' at the end of the username, which
> > our pw(8) doesn't allow.
>
> The same patch which you proposed was suggested on the
> freebsd-current list. See the th
Hello hackers...
I'm wondering why there is "insecure" options in /etc/ttys for virtual
consoles.
As we all know, "insecure" for ttyvX means that we can't directly log in
as root, but "insecure" for console field in /etc/ttys means only that
we will be asked for root's password in single mode.
Hm
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, Ryan Thompson wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I've recently had the pleasure of configuring a FreeBSD machine as a
> Samba Primary Domain Controller. In smb.conf, one can specify an "add
> user script" directive to automate the creation of machine accounts.
> Otherwise, you have to m
If I had to take a guess, the reason normal user logins are disabled
during "insecure" on single mode is because of the way authentication may
be getting handled, among other things.
First off, it's single-user mode, meant for only the root user; no one
else has a need for the system at that point
At 12:45 PM -0500 12/27/02, Craig Rodrigues wrote:
On Fri, Dec 27, 2002 at 11:35:45AM -0600, Ryan Thompson wrote:
Problem is, smb requires a '$' at the end of the username, which our
pw(8) doesn't allow.
The same patch which you proposed was suggested on the freebsd-current list.
See the thre
Hello;
I don't think we have a framebuffer, at least not like
Linux. Check out the VESA module and wait for the KGI
port to arrive (not soon but work is going on).
cheers,
Pedro.
=
---
Pedro F. Giffuni
M.SC. Industrial Eng. University of Pittsburgh
Mech. Eng. Unive
Are there any strange interactions between NFS and filesystems that are not
UFS? E.g. UFS2? Does NFS support new features that these fs's may implement?
Thanks,
Joe
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
joe mcguckin wrote:
> Are there any strange interactions between NFS and filesystems that are not
> UFS? E.g. UFS2? Does NFS support new features that these fs's may implement?
NFS proxies the VFS requests it understands as RPC's to the server
machine. Because these are proxied by RPC rather than
Thats bad, we could have ported our desktop grade OS to BSD :(
~Mayuresh
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002, [iso-8859-1] Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> Date: Fri, 27 Dec 2002 23:07:32 +0100 (CET)
> From: "[iso-8859-1] Pedro F. Giffuni" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Mayuresh Kathe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL PROT
12 matches
Mail list logo
