M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Chuck Tuffli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I'm a newbie to FreeBSD and am wondering if there is a way to pass
> : loadable kernel modules parameters. Under Linux, if a module had
> : configurable parameters "a" and "b", you can
Dear All,
As per the subject line, I have been experiencing this for the past two
weeks now.
References:
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=222082+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20021027.freebsd-stable
http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=630174+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/2
HI net'ers !!
i read some message on the list archive and someone says that we can use
spoofing with ng
how can i do spooging with ng like this ???
WAN --- spoofer ( one ng node ) --- lan
THANX
_
The new MSN 8: advanced ju
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> With kenv(1) you can modify kernel environment variables, which hold the
> tunables. Previously, you could only set those at boot time.
Note that there are some values which are used to determine the
size of KVA space allocations, and changing them after boot,
even if it's
I am trying to install free on this machine, as I have no
floppy/cdrom for this box I am restricted to installing via another laptop
then swapping the drive back.
Boot goes fine until:
ata0-master: no status, reselecting device
ata0-master: timeout sending command=ec s=ff e=00
at
Terry Lambert wrote:
> Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > With kenv(1) you can modify kernel environment variables, which hold the
> > tunables. Previously, you could only set those at boot time.
>
> Note that there are some values which are used to determine the
> size of KVA space allocations, and chang
Maxime Henrion wrote:
> > The kernel environment is most useful for diagnostic porposes, and
> > for use in the way descrived in this thread -- to provide a means
> > of passing parameters that should not be parameters to modules that
> > should not need parameters in the first place. Many times,
On 6 Nov 2002, Al-Afu wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> As per the subject line, I have been experiencing this for the past two
> weeks now.
>
> References:
>
>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=222082+0+archive/2002/freebsd-stable/20021027.freebsd-stable
>
>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi
..
if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
..
Hmmm... is this legal ?
http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
Zlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On 06-Nov-2002 Marc Olzheim wrote:
> ..
> if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
> ..
>
> Hmmm... is this legal ?
>
> http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
If it were nd++, yes. However, it is ++nd, thus, the increment
happens first, then the call to parse
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 05:46:53PM +0100, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> ..
> if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
> ..
>
> Hmmm... is this legal ?
>
> http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
In this particular case, the value of 'nd' is not *used* anywhere in the
ex
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 11:54:17AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 06-Nov-2002 Marc Olzheim wrote:
> > ..
> > if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
> > ..
> >
> > Hmmm... is this legal ?
> >
> > http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
>
> If it were nd++,
Yes. I am using the fxp driver. Any other possiblities? Or should I take
it easy (and stick to 4.6.2-RELEASE) until such time a fix for the fxp
driver on 4.7-RELEASE is done?
---
dmesg output follows:
---
avail memory = 778977280 (760720K bytes)
Preloaded e
> If it were nd++, yes. However, it is ++nd, thus, the increment
> happens first, then the call to parse_char_class(), then the assignment
> to nd.
Ah right, sorry, my mistake...
Zlo
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
It's legal, though one would have to know what the author was thinking
(or at least read the surrounding code) before stating that it's also
"correct".
It's legal because, unlike the example given in that FAQ entry you
referenced, there's an implicit ordering in the expression that even
the mo
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Al-Afu writes:
>Yes. I am using the fxp driver. Any other possiblities? Or should I take
>it easy (and stick to 4.6.2-RELEASE) until such time a fix for the fxp
>driver on 4.7-RELEASE is done?
I've checked into -stable the fxp driver change that fixes some
random cr
On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> As far as PCI goes (or anything they publish, for that matter), the
> MindShare books are very, very good. But for the particular question
> of how much physical address space is eaten, you really have to go to
> the chipset spec. sheets to get the right
On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 04:01, Bernd Walter wrote:
>
> 1T disks and bigger are not supported under -stable.
Perhaps that should be > 1TB disks are not supported under stable...I
have a 1TB RAID Array (Qlogic 2200 FC Copper, Chaparrel RAID
Controller)...although I have to admit that losing 200G of i
Marc Olzheim wrote:
> ..
> if ((nd = parse_char_class(++nd)) == NULL) {
> ..
>
> Hmmm... is this legal ?
>
> http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/q3.1.html seems to tell otherwise...
The FAQ entry you reference has nothing to say about this at
all... it has to do with whether the *location* of the l
[snip interesting piece of compiler history]
> In any case, your fears are unfounded, for the most part, since
> the FAQ entry you are referencing is not analogous to the construct
> you are trying to apply it to, anyway, and the FAQ fails to deal
> with many of these portability issues, too, sinc
Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Nov 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > As far as PCI goes (or anything they publish, for that matter), the
> > MindShare books are very, very good. But for the particular question
> > of how much physical address space is eaten, you really have to go to
> > the chipset s
=
The Ultimate Bulk Email Solution Has Finally Arrived!
=
If you have a product, service, information or a message you would like
to get out to millions of potential buyers, then th
On Wed, Nov 06, 2002 at 01:27:10PM -0700, John-David Childs wrote:
> On Sun, 2002-11-03 at 04:01, Bernd Walter wrote:
> >
> > 1T disks and bigger are not supported under -stable.
>
> Perhaps that should be > 1TB disks are not supported under stable...I
> have a 1TB RAID Array (Qlogic 2200 FC Copp
Whoops, hit the 'send' too fast...
> With some minor modifications to disklabel, you can label a 2 Tb disk.
> We've done it with a 1.4Tb disk:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da20a 669G 246G 370G40%/rapraid0
> /dev/
On Tue, Nov 05, 2002 at 09:05:38PM +0300, Anton Vinokurov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I am running FreeBSD 4.7-release and try to use ATEN UC10T USB-to-Ethernet
> adapter. Unfortunately it causes my system to print something like:
> kue0: watchdog timeout
> kue0: usb error on tx: TIMEOUT
> following by freez
Marc Olzheim wrote:
> > In any case, your fears are unfounded, for the most part, since
> > the FAQ entry you are referencing is not analogous to the construct
> > you are trying to apply it to, anyway, and the FAQ fails to deal
> > with many of these portability issues, too, since it assumes that
On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Marc Olzheim wrote:
> With some minor modifications to disklabel, you can label a 2 Tb disk.
> We've done it with a 1.4Tb disk:
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
> /dev/da20a 669G 246G 370G40%/rapraid0
> /
I've been trying to figure out how to use the bus_dma* functions in the
DRM. What I'm working on at the moment is the ATI PCIGART. How it
works right now is an ioctl is done which mallocs a chunk of memory (up
to 32MB). Later, the ioctl that sets up dma allocates a physically
contiguous 32K of m
On 6 Nov 2002, Eric Anholt wrote:
> I've been trying to figure out how to use the bus_dma* functions in the
> DRM. What I'm working on at the moment is the ATI PCIGART. How it
> works right now is an ioctl is done which mallocs a chunk of memory (up
> to 32MB). Later, the ioctl that sets up dma
On Wed, 2002-11-06 at 23:36, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On 6 Nov 2002, Eric Anholt wrote:
> > I've been trying to figure out how to use the bus_dma* functions in the
> > DRM. What I'm working on at the moment is the ATI PCIGART. How it
> > works right now is an ioctl is done which mallocs a chunk of me
30 matches
Mail list logo
