Urgent Assistance & Investment

2002-10-02 Thread MR. DANJUMA YUSUF
STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT. I am a native of Cape Town in South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with the South Africa MINISTRY OF MINERAL AND ENERGY First and foremost, I apologized using this medium to reach you for a transaction/business of this magnitude, but this is due to C

Re: ACPI programming under FreeBSD?

2002-10-02 Thread Mark Santcroos
Hi, I have a very simple program that does exactly this using sysctl's. Find it attached. ACPI developers, there is alot more information available in the kernel about ACPI that we don't export to userland yet. Do you think we should do that using more sysctl's or should we implement some ioctl

Bug in nullfs?

2002-10-02 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
Hello hackers. I have found something like this, but I'm not sure of this is a bug in nullfs: # cd # mkdir dir1 # mkdir dir1/dir2 # mkdir dir3 # mount_null dir1 dir3 Now simple proram "test": -[ start ]- #include #include #include #include #i

Re: ACPI programming under FreeBSD?

2002-10-02 Thread Oliver Fromme
Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > ACPI developers, there is alot more information available in the kernel about > ACPI that we don't export to userland yet. > Do you think we should do that using more sysctl's or should we implement > some ioctl's on /dev/acpi to retrieve the inform

Re: ACPI programming under FreeBSD?

2002-10-02 Thread Socketd
>> Original Message << On 10/2/02, 12:34:49 PM, Oliver Fromme <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote regarding Re: ACPI programming under FreeBSD?: > Mark Santcroos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > ACPI developers, there is alot more information available in the kernel about

Re: Getfsstat(2), statfs(2) and fstatfs(2) jailed.

2002-10-02 Thread Oliver Fromme
Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > With this kernel module for FreeBSD 4.x process in jail can see only > file systems that are mounted in jail's chroot directory. > > For example if we have mounted: > [...] Also see PR 26740: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/26

Re: sis900 : sis0 attach returned 6

2002-10-02 Thread Jim Rowan
> From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: sis900: sis0 attach returned 6 > > Guido, > > I did some more digging and it appears the bigger problem is that the > RTL8201 external PHY isn't supported (yet) in FreeBSD. Patches to support > this PHY, along with reports of successfu

sis0 - phy problem

2002-10-02 Thread bsd
hi, i also encounter problem with sis0 nic onboard. here is an extract from dmesg: FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE sis0: port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xe780-0xe7800fff irq \ at device 1.1 on pci0 sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 miibus0: on sis0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX

PRNG not seeded - error in non-root ssh inside 4.6.2 jails...

2002-10-02 Thread Firsto Lasto
Hello, I have found that if you create a jail in FreeBSD 4.6.2, and then log into that jail ... if you are root you can scp and ssh just fine. However if you are not root and you attempt to ssh or scp, you get this error: PRNG is not seeded A few details - first, I created my jail by simply

Crash dump with attach =P

2002-10-02 Thread Paolo Pisati
sorry... =P -- Paolo Italian FreeBSD User Group: http://www.gufi.org Script started on Wed Oct 2 14:42:26 2002 GNU gdb 4.18 (FreeBSD) Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distr

Crash dump in attach

2002-10-02 Thread Paolo Pisati
It looks like i've finally achieved my first crash dump: see it in attach thanks -- Paolo Italian FreeBSD User Group: http://www.gufi.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Getfsstat(2), statfs(2) and fstatfs(2) jailed.

2002-10-02 Thread Pawel Jakub Dawidek
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 12:45:36PM +0200, Oliver Fromme wrote: +> Pawel Jakub Dawidek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +> > With this kernel module for FreeBSD 4.x process in jail can see only +> > file systems that are mounted in jail's chroot directory. +> > +> > For example if we have mounted: +

Re: vmware reads disk on non-sector boundary

2002-10-02 Thread Garance A Drosihn
At 7:52 PM +0200 9/25/02, Mark Santcroos wrote: >On Wed, Sep 25, 2002, Mark Santcroos wrote: > > A fact is that vmware did work up until a few months. I didn't do > > a binary search yet. That is last resort... > >Anyone running a -current of several months old and using vmware2? >If so, can you

Re: ACPI programming under FreeBSD?

2002-10-02 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On Wed, 2002-10-02 at 20:14, Socketd wrote: > > I'm not an ACPI developer, but I really like the sysctl > > interface, because it enables you to retrieve information > > from within scripts easily. For ioctls you would have to > > write a separate tool to be able to access it. > > I think the li

Re: sis0 - phy problem

2002-10-02 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> hi, > i also encounter problem with sis0 nic onboard. here is an > extract from dmesg: > > FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE > > sis0: port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xe780-0xe7800fff irq \ > at device 1.1 on pci0 > sis0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00 > miibus0: on sis0 > ukphy0: on miibus0 > ukphy0:

Re: sis900 : sis0 attach returned 6

2002-10-02 Thread Matthew Emmerton
> > From: "Matthew Emmerton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: sis900: sis0 attach returned 6 > > > > Guido, > > > > I did some more digging and it appears the bigger problem is that the > > RTL8201 external PHY isn't supported (yet) in FreeBSD. Patches to support > > this PHY, along with repo

Re: sis900 : sis0 attach returned 6

2002-10-02 Thread Guido Van Hoecke
Matt, > It looks like the 8201L PHY was first supported in 4.6-RELEASE, but the PR > wasn't updated to reflect this. > > Guido, if possible, could you try with 4.6.2-RELEASE and see if your card > gets detected? I am running 'FreeBSD 4.6.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Aug 14 21:23:26 GMT 2002 [EMAIL PROTECT