I have dual pentium, and started lately to come to the
console.
microuptime() went backwards.
I went over the list (hackers) and saw the last discussion
on microuptime() which suggested to remove apm0.
I have it disabled in my config (by default), but still I see these.
APM is disabled in the
On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:50:34AM +, zvezdi wrote:
> I went over the list (hackers) and saw the last discussion
> on microuptime() which suggested to remove apm0.
>
> I have it disabled in my config (by default), but still I see these.
> APM is disabled in the bios.
Removing apm has a sli
On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:16:51 +0900 Hiroharu Tamaru
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this problem solved? I am now in the same situation.
Just today.
> It used to work fine for me before, when I run it on
> PentiumII-450MHz/440BX. A few weeks ago, I upgraded the CPU and the
> M/B to Pentium4-1.8G
David Malone writes:
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2002 at 10:50:34AM +, zvezdi wrote:
>> I went over the list (hackers) and saw the last discussion
>> on microuptime() which suggested to remove apm0.
>>
>> I have it disabled in my config (by default), but still I see these.
>> APM is disabled in the
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:20:30 +0200 Alexander Leidinger
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Add "options CPU_ENABLE_SSE" and it should work (it seems only P4s
> have this problem).
Ooops... add it to your kernel config of course...
Bye,
Alexander.
--
Yes, I've heard of "decaf." What's you
Andriy,
First of all thank you for your detailed reports, they could be very
useful. Unfortunately, currently I am a bit busy due to participation
in first Ukrainian OSS Conference, therefore it might be better to
submit those reports to someone else - I'd recommend either Daniel
Eischen <[EMAIL
Hello,
I have an ATI Xpert 2000 Pro (Rage 128 Pro) installed.
Once X windows had been started, power off (shutdown -p) doesn't work
anymore. The system becomes idle after the uptime message.
If shutdown -p is called without X had been started power off works.
Also zzz works and the machine can be
On Sep 17 at 18:25, kai ouyang spoke:
> I want to read the 48th sector in ad0. in kernel space, if I use the
> 'open' , 'lseek' , 'read' and 'close', it is wrong!
Does `open' fail? How does it fail?
NB: you're using charset=gb2312. Why not something like us-ascii?
(This list is English.)
I made a small patch that extends the "!program" syntax so that you can
also specify not-this-program, in a manner similar to what is already
possible for hosts ("!+program" and "!-program"). Syslogd really ought
to be extended to support sets of programs and hosts, but this small
change shoul
ẺÊͺ¶ÒÁà¡ÕèÂǡѺá¹Çâ¹éÁ¡ÒÃ·Ó§Ò¹ã¹»Õ 2002
1.¢³Ð¹Õé¤Ø³ ? ?¡ÓÅѧÈÖ¡ÉÒÍÂÙè ? ·Ó§Ò¹»ÃÐ¨Ó ?¡ÓÅѧËÒ§Ò¹ ? ¡ÓÅѧÈÖ¡ÉÒáÅÐ·Ó §Ò¹ä»´éÇÂ
µÍº
...
2.¤Ø³¾Í㨡Ѻ§Ò¹ã¹»Ñ¨¨ØºÑ¹à¾Õ§㴠?? ¾Íã¨ÁÒ¡ ? »Ò¹¡ÅÒ§ ? àº×èͧÒ
Hello,
what do kern.shutdown.poweroff_delay and kproc_shutdown_wait affect?
Do they have something to do with APM poweroff?
-Hanspeter
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On 20-Sep-2002 Hanspeter Roth wrote:
> Hello,
>
> what do kern.shutdown.poweroff_delay and kproc_shutdown_wait affect?
> Do they have something to do with APM poweroff?
My guess is that the poweroff_delay applies to APM/ACPI power off delay.
kproc_shutdown_wait determines how long we wait for t
On Sep 20 at 16:37, John Baldwin spoke:
> My guess is that the poweroff_delay applies to APM/ACPI power off delay.
It seems these are the number of miliseconds after the uptime
message. Default seems to be 5000.
But why not 1000 or less?
Or can it be that even 5000 is too few?
-Hanspeter
To
On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:37:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> libfetch seems to have a bug such that if a disconnect happens at
> a particular point it spins in a tight loop.
>
> I tracked it down to this fix:
I'm still seeing this. Have you heard anything from DES? If not,
please go ahe
* Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020920 14:46] wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2002 at 09:37:21PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > libfetch seems to have a bug such that if a disconnect happens at
> > a particular point it spins in a tight loop.
> >
> > I tracked it down to this fix:
>
> I'm stil
This is probably common question, but I was wondering if there
is any temperature monitoring mechanisms out there; specifically
for ABit motherboard (KG7).
I found a "consolehm" project in sysutils, but it seems to
require a /dev/smb0 device...
ConsoleHM uses the SMBus Driver for PIIX4
I've has a lot of luck with (x)mbmon from uh, misc I think (or is it
sysutils?)
He has a new version out that you should also check out.. not sure if
there is a port yet..
On Fri, 20 Sep 2002, Clark C. Evans wrote:
> This is probably common question, but I was wondering if there
> is any tempe
At Fri, 20 Sep 2002 13:20:30 +0200,
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Sep 2002 23:16:51 +0900 Hiroharu Tamaru
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Is this problem solved? I am now in the same situation.
>
> Just today.
>
> > It used to work fine for me before, when I run it on
> > Penti
Free Adult Entertainment http://www.xrah.com 18+ only
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
In message: <20020915203835.GA3497@gallium>
Dominic Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: disadvantages:
: some drivers need to be able to allocate a large chunk of contiguous
: memory to operate correctly, this means some drivers cant work when not
: compiled in to the kernel (becaus
Greetings,
I have been doing graphics programming in Windows for a few years, and am
interested in broadening my horizons. I'm interested in attempting to get
FreeBSD to switch video modes and gain access to video memory, perhaps to
attempt a simple OpenGL-like implementation or the like, entirel
21 matches
Mail list logo
