Hello,
The sockets for my software are based on the BSD
Sockets API. I want to make them fully compatiable with the BSD Sockets. For
that I require a complete listing of the BSD Sockets function
prototypes. can you guide me where i can find them. Thanks a
lot.
Best Regards,
Sulaiman Kha
I was poking around in various nic drivers and I noticed that several of
them have what seems to be an odd idiom in their generic attach
functions. For instance in sys/dev/ed/if_ed.c in ed_attach(), filling
in the interface fields and attaching the interface is protected by and
"if (!ifp->if_name
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002 14:22:28 +0600 Sulaiman Khan wrote:
> The sockets for my software are based on the BSD Sockets API. I want
> to make them fully compatiable with the BSD Sockets. For that I
> require a complete listing of the BSD Sockets function prototypes. can
> you guide me where i can find
Well the one we have in -CURRENT lacks dynamic module support (as does IRS).
I just wanted to know if there was any issues for not implementing IRS
before ?
Thanx
Paul
Peter Wemm wrote:
> Paul Khavkine wrote:
> > Hi folks.
> > Since FreeBSD currently lacks a fully functional NSS implementati
I already asked this question on freebsd-questions. No answers were to be
found, and several of the list members there pointed me to this list as a
likely spot to get some suggestions. My apologies in advance, I did try to
find the charter for this list to make sure asking this question here wasn'
FreeBSD rarpd returns "no interfaces" on say, laptops, which have
removable Ethernet NICs.
This can be corrected by replacing the SIOCGIFCONF ioctl() in the
init() routine with getifaddrs(). OpenBSD rarpd.c (version 1.29)
does it this way and hence I ported that version to -stable
retrofitting th
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Jay West wrote:
> At one point I saw a program on the net that did benchmarks on a given
> system of sending the same data via message queues, sockets, pipes, etc. but
> I can't seem to find it anymore. The long and short of my question is - are
> SYSV IPC message queues on F
* Jay West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020724 08:01] wrote:
>
> I'm writing a rather major project under FreeBSD, and making fairly heavy
> use of SYSV message queues so that multiple processes can communicate. I am
> finding the response times for round trip message delivery between two given
> process
Hello there...
I hope nobody will kill me for this post.
Here is my idea how to remove set-uid-root from aplications like
passwd/chpass/chsh/chfn/etc. I think in this way we will be much more
secure.
http://garage.freebsd.pl/pwd_parser.tgz
And now description (from README):
I've create this par
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: At 17:44 23/7/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: > Bob Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: >: [...]
: >: none2@pci0:11:0:class=0x028000 card=0x777010b7 chip=0x77701
On Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:58:23AM +0930, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> IMO the tags aren't the problem with DocBook. It's just *really*
> difficult to get good-looking results with.
What did you think of the 2nd edition of the Handbook? That was Docbook
toolchain all the way (with the possibl
Hello,
I've been having some very serious stability problems with FreeBSD, mostly
it seems with the file system. I've had these problems since 4.3, but now
I have a free machine that isn't doing anything critical to really pound
on the issue.
twister# uname -a
FreeBSD twister.zang.com 4.6-RELEA
Hi,
At 21:26 24/7/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
>[...]
>So if you have a saner delay value, does it probe? 100ms is a very
>long time to delay before getting the vendor info (which should
>already be present before the call to pci_get_vendor due to caching,
>iirc).
With 3us it usually works, with n
On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:32:25PM -0700, John Engelhart wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've been having some very serious stability problems with FreeBSD, mostly
> it seems with the file system. I've had these problems since 4.3, but now
> I have a free machine that isn't doing anything critical to really
On Thu, 25 Jul 2002, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 24, 2002 at 02:32:25PM -0700, John Engelhart wrote:
> >
> > Thoughts? Is it memory? Is it CPU? One of the CPU's is brand new. One
> > of the CPU's is left over from one of the original systems. I've just
> > purchased another CPU to rule
Jay West wrote:
> I'm writing a rather major project under FreeBSD, and making fairly heavy
> use of SYSV message queues so that multiple processes can communicate. I am
> finding the response times for round trip message delivery between two given
> processes to be pretty horrid, typically about
Paul Khavkine wrote:
> Well the one we have in -CURRENT lacks dynamic module support (as does IRS).
>
> I just wanted to know if there was any issues for not implementing IRS
> before ?
The BIND IRS implementation depends on use of the BIND resolver
library. In FreeBSD, the resolver library is
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Hi,
:
: At 21:26 24/7/02, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: >[...]
: >So if you have a saner delay value, does it probe? 100ms is a very
: >long time to delay before getting the vendor info (which should
: >already be pre
I'm looking into finally going wireless, and it seems that 802.11a is the
way to go, faster and better than 802.11b. So is there a decent card that
FreeBSD supports? All of the cards I've seen so far are Cardbus cards,
which -stable doesn't yet support, AFAIK.
Alternatively, what's the status o
11a is great unless you want to connect to anything..
most nets e.g. starbucks or singapore airport (etc.etc.)
are 11b
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Frank Mayhar wrote:
> I'm looking into finally going wireless, and it seems that 802.11a is the
> way to go, faster and better than 802.11b. So is there a
Ok so I looke in the 4.6 release notes but without reading teh spec of
every card mentionned, are there any recomendations for fibrechannel
adapters? (showing his ignorance he assumes it is the same as
SCSI-over-Fibre..
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd
I'll be in NY for the next two weeks, I expect connectivity to be
spotty, if anyone wants to get together let me know!
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] [#bsdcode/efnet/irc.prison.net]
'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ig
Hi,
Please add me to the BSD mailing list for
x86
Thank you,
Wanda Williams
On Wednesday 24 July 2002 01:11 pm, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote:
| Hello there...
| And pwd_parser is one, little set-uid-root for all of those applications.
| This is something like brigde between (now set-gid on "passwd" group)
| passwd/chpass/etc. and pwd_mkdb(8).
:
| I know that passwd/chpass a
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I'm looking into finally going wireless, and it seems that 802.11a is the
: way to go, faster and better than 802.11b. So is there a decent card that
: FreeBSD supports? All of the cards I've seen so far are C
M. Warner Losh wrote:
> That's ok, since there's no 802.11a support in FreeBSD at the moment.
> There might be a binary only driver in the future, but don't even
> think about asking me about it because I'm not working on it and can't
> say more in public or private.
Hmm. No docs for the cards,
Title: »ùÇñ³Àç(Å×ÀÌÇÁ)¸¦¹Þ¾Æº¸°í½ÍÀ¸½ÅºÐÀºÁÖ¼Ò¸¦±âÀçÇϽÅÈÄ.¾Æ·¡ÀǽÅûÇϱâ¹öÆ°À»Å¬¸¯Çϼ¼¿ä.
»ùÇÃÅ×ÀÌÇÁ ½ÅûÀÚ´Â ÁÖ¼ÒÈ®Àΰú ÇÔ²² ¹«·á·Î ±³Àç
¹× ÇÁ·Î±×·
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Frank Mayhar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: M. Warner Losh wrote:
: > That's ok, since there's no 802.11a support in FreeBSD at the moment.
: > There might be a binary only driver in the future, but don't even
: > think about asking me about it because I'
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Paul Khavkine wrote:
> > Well the one we have in -CURRENT lacks dynamic module support (as does IRS).
> >
> > I just wanted to know if there was any issues for not implementing IRS
> > before ?
>
> The BIND IRS implementation depends on use of the BIN
Richard Sharpe wrote:
> Hmmm, so what you are telling me is that winbindd will not work on FreeBSD
> even under 5.0?
What part of "FreeBSD 5.x implements NSS, but does not implement
IRS" was unclear? 8-).
The "winbindd" program is an NSS interfaced program; therefore it
should work *fine* in 5.
On Wed, 24 Jul 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > Hmmm, so what you are telling me is that winbindd will not work on FreeBSD
> > even under 5.0?
>
> What part of "FreeBSD 5.x implements NSS, but does not implement
> IRS" was unclear? 8-).
>
> The "winbindd" program is an NS
Richard Sharpe wrote:
> > The "winbindd" program is an NSS interfaced program; therefore it
> > should work *fine* in 5.x, since NSS supposedly works fine in 5.x.
>
> Well, you were saying that DSOs were unsafe or some such, so I assumed
> that FreeBSD 5.x's NSS did not support DSOs, and thus win
32 matches
Mail list logo
