--- Terry Lambert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Unfortunately, the FreeBSD ethernet interface
> isn't terribly
> > smart. Ideally, it would provide a virtual
> interface per VIP,
> > all the way down to the card; it doesn't.
>
> Probably wasn't very clear here.
>
> The
anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
BSD/Solaris machines?
i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
offered.
thanks!
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Everything you'll ever need on
I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
running their own postgres server.
Because of this fact:
By default, Postgres allocates 34 semaphores, which is over half the
default system total of 60.
I need to tune kernel SHM settings in order to even run the second
* andrew mejia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:37] wrote:
> anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
> BSD/Solaris machines?
>
> i'm trying to share out two 200gb plus raid arrays to
> a Mac LAN and will accept any information that can be
> offered.
1) This doesn't belong on -hackers.
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:38] wrote:
>
> I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails, 8 of which will be
> running their own postgres server.
You should be aware of the kern.ipc.shm_use_phys sysctl, you might
want to try flipping it on if you encounter problems as
[ this is probably more appropriate for -net, -hackers bcc:'d ]
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 08:35:01AM +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
> [andrew]$ exactly what i would suggest. a single
> NIC can handle multiple assigments pretty easily,
> unless you're expecting mega-traffic. but even then
> you coul
Hello hackers,
I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
things, and it works pretty well if the interval is greater than
1 msec. (recompiled the kernel wi
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
> specialized things. The idea is that the program must send
> packets each T seconds. Ok, I know.. use the sleep, microsleep
> things, and it work
On Thu, 2 May 2002, Matthew D. Fuller wrote:
> Well, the stab didn't go because nobody was interested 8-)
Sorry --- I was interested, but I didn't see your original message. This
problem has been biting me (and a client) in the ass for quite some time.
> I actually had in mind some farther-r
Hi,
At 08:37 03/05/02 +0100, andrew mejia wrote:
>anyone ever configure/install/use netatalk on their
>BSD/Solaris machines?
We run netatalk on both FreeBSD 4.x and Solaris 8. By and large it 'just
works'. Build with gcc 2.95 (not 3.x) to avoid problems on Solaris.
--
Bob Bishop
On Friday 03 May 2002 02:37 am, Dave Hayes wrote:
|
|
| All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
| annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
| process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
| lists. Perhaps some sort
>It appears that there is no support for the Adaptec 2903b SCSI card, but of
>course I could be wrong. I would like to get this card to work, so if anyone
>could point me to a painfully obvious url or some documentation on how to
>get it to work that I have clearly overlooked, I would be forever
So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
thanks,
PT
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 00:38] wrote:
> >
> > I have a large server that will be running ~24 jails
On 03-May-2002 Jason Borkowsky wrote:
>
>> > Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
>> > doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
>> > efficient processes.
>> >
>> > I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a "w
hi,
one possible solution could be to use gettimeofday (usec resolution )
and do a busy wait in a loop for T sec.
manish
http://www.cis.udel.edu/~jain
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> Hello hackers,
>
> I am trying to write a simple C program that must do some
> specialized thin
Hello All:
I have pasted the error messages am getting on my
FreeBSD-4.5-RELEASE machine. I have attached the /etc/ttys file with the
mail, I hope that will be useful for the analysis since I have modified it
for /dev/ttyv8 -- KDM
FOLLOWING is the error message what am getting continuous
Brian T.Schellenberger wrote:
> The existance of this thread merely demonstrates that people don't make use
> the resources that are already out there.
No, the existence of this thread demonstrates that the historical explanation
is less than satisfying as an excuse for the broken nomenclature
* Patrick Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020503 07:19] wrote:
>
> So kern.ipc.shm_use_phys=1 will give me more flexibility, but will slow
> down performance (vs. using kernel memory) ?
It will not cause any problems unless you don't have enough memory.
--
-Alfred Perlstein [[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
'In
> >> > Greetings! I have a FreeBSD-4.5 box that is a specialized server box. It
> >> > doesn't run any user processes and only runs a bunch of small, server
> >> > efficient processes.
> >> >
> >> > I have an inconsistency that I am trying to explain. When I do a "w"
> >> > command
> >> > on the
Dominic Marks wrote:
> On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 01:52:02PM +0200, Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> > Now the problem is that I want to know if it is possible, and
> > how, to schedule events with a precision greater (or equal to))
> > than 1ms. Maybe an approach with posix timers? Maybe move the app
> >
On Fri, 3 May 2002 09:15:01 -0400
Brian T.Schellenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTS> Stable is, in fact, fairly stable. I mean, if you are going to track updates
I would go so far as to say that -stable is remarkably stable. So
much so that it is easily mistaken for some kind of ma
> All this dovetails with something I expressed earlier, with regards to
> annotating documentation. Somehow, this community needs to be able to
> process a certan class of ideas in a format other than linear mailing
> lists. Perhaps some sort of meta-document is needed which describes
> how thin
JJ Behrens wrote:
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the same
> thing with the FreeBSD handbook pages
On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI stud
Thus spake R. David Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Fri, 3 May 2002, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any
Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
>
[SNIP]
> 1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
>
in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
TfH
[SNIP]
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
That's right, agree 100%. I hadn't crash, but this fine granularity hard
to realize while other parts of system taking apart unpredictably.
More to fix than to use...
Igor,
ua3qrz
-Original Message-
From: Thierry Herbelot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:18 PM
To:
Hello; I have this quirky piece of serial equipment that I'm trying to
figure out how to work. I'm attempting to write a simple program that
sends a string of text given on the cmdline out to the serial port to
a 132x80 ANSI(?) serial display
The problem I think I'm having is with hardware flow
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
>
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
Hi all,
I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
on their own. Also, I have seen commits made before which do the same
thing w
On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 10:45:32PM +0100, Hiten Pandya wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am submitting a patch which removes the register keyword from
> sys/kern/vfs_syscalls.c. The reason I am doing this is very simple.
>
> The 'register' keyword has no effect, as compilers do enough optimizations
> on
> Paolo Di Francesco wrote:
> >
> [SNIP]
> > 1 msec. (recompiled the kernel with HZ=10)
> >
>
> in my experience, compiling a kernel with HZ greater than 10.000 (ten
> thousand) is uselesss (I even had crash with greater HZ)
>
> TfH
>
Yes, I had the same problem (4,4 stable and the same
Celebrate your Mother's love by sending a beautiful bouquet of fresh flowers
from
Flower.com
that will let her know how much she means to you.
PRICES STARTING AT
$29.95
Includes FREE Glass Vase($9.95
Value)
Quantities are limited so place your order today
forMother's Day.
ORD
Terry Lambert writes:
> JJ Behrens wrote:
> > The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end o
> f
> > every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve
> to
> > enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries. Perhaps doing the
> same
Bakul Shah wrote:
> > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > any set of choices, before you get to what you want (HCI studies
> > at Bell
In a message written on Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:15:58AM -0700, JJ Behrens wrote:
> The online documentation for PHP allows users to post comments at the end of
> every page of the online documentation. Often times, these comments serve to
> enlighten others about various quirks of the libraries.
"R. David Murray" wrote:
> Sorry for dropping in to the middle of a conversation, but this
> comment puzzles me. I fail to see how:
>
> handbook + per-page comments from readers
>
> is *inferior* to:
>
>handbook with no comments
>
> given that the handbook maintainers do not have infina
Terry Lambert writes:
> Bakul Shah wrote:
> > > Aside from the classification problem (everyone has to classify
> > > the same way for them to be able to get the information out),
> > > the human factors argue that the depth should not exceed 3 on
> > > any set of choices, before you get to what y
> itself (since it likes to). FreeBSD does not have code to handle
> assigning PNP resources, or at least code that works well :) (There is the
> PNPBIOS kernel option, but I'm not sure that works anymore.)
The PNPBIOS option just implements another accessor method; resource
allocation is a sep
>
> This was -stable- but it's really a hacker's question.
>
> I really am *not* much of an i386 weenie and I'll have to admit that I don't
> fully understand the interrupt mask scheme and I ran into a troubling problem
> .
>
> I was running some very extensive tests on a dual processor (but no
40 matches
Mail list logo
