>From what I have gathered from 4.4bsd book and 4.3 freebsd source code,
struct buf and various b* (read, write etc) functions implement the file
cache. I am wondering where the physical pages that struct buf has
references to reside in the vm map. It seems its virtual addresses are
allocated usi
Hi, All
Sorry, for posting a big dump, but it is needed for understanding
the problem.
I have very slow tcp connection between two computers on the same LAN
This computers uses FreeBSD 4.4 GENERIC kernel
The problem only occurs when I try to connect to FTP on host A
There are NO OTHER problems
Hello There,
I was wondering if you know of any commands that would allow me to update the cvs port
for my freebsd server through a firewall.
I can not access the internet without going through the firewall.
Thank you for your help
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubsc
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Dariush Azimi wrote:
> I can not access the internet without going through the firewall.
I use to run small redirector (plug) on server with public IP address and
then on client cvsup -g -L 2 -P m /etc/cvsupfile.
Ladislav Kostal
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECT
As far as I know, this is a problem that was fixed in -STABLE sometime in
the last month or 2. If I were you I'd upgrade to 4.5 when it comes out
and see if that solves the problem.
Ken
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Dmitry Mottl wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Sorry, for posting a big dump, but it is needed for un
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Dmitry Mottl wrote:
> Hi, All
>
> Sorry, for posting a big dump, but it is needed for understanding
> the problem.
>
> I have very slow tcp connection between two computers on the same LAN
> This computers uses FreeBSD 4.4 GENERIC kernel
>
> This is a TCPDUMP for and passive
It is a little tricky (IMHO) to set up, but you can use m3socks to allow
cvsup to use a SOCKS proxy, if you have one of those. I'm also behind a
firewall so that is what I did.
Regards -- Andy
> From: Ladislav Kostal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Dariush Azimi wrote:
> > I ca
So I seem to have the libntp/audio.c stuff working under FreeBSD, and
I'm noticing that while the IRIG refclock seems to be working pretty
well, as time passes the "freq" value slowly and steadily increases to
the point where it exceeds 250 and ntpd stops paying attention to the
clock.
Any though
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Grover, Andrew wrote:
> It is a little tricky (IMHO) to set up, but you can use m3socks to allow
> cvsup to use a SOCKS proxy, if you have one of those. I'm also behind a
> firewall so that is what I did.
>
> Regards -- Andy
>
> > From: Ladislav Kostal [
* Hyong-Youb Kim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020125 02:08] wrote:
>
> >From what I have gathered from 4.4bsd book and 4.3 freebsd source code,
> struct buf and various b* (read, write etc) functions implement the file
> cache. I am wondering where the physical pages that struct buf has
> references to r
Yeah, I guess it could be packet collision or something... are you
connecting the computers through a hub?
Ken
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Mike Silbersack wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Dmitry Mottl wrote:
>
> > Hi, All
> >
> > Sorry, for posting a big dump, but it is needed for understanding
> > the
Hi,
does anyone know if a simple priority disk scheduler exists for a recent
(4.X) FreeBSD? I don't need anything fancy, basically the POSIX rtprio
equivalent for disks.
The Eclipse people (at Bell) have something like that, but it's based on
an older kernel, and I'd rather use something more
Did you make any progress on this Andrew ?
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Poul-Henning Kamp writes:
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "And
>rew R. Reiter" writes:
>>
>>Someone already doing this? If not, I'm down.
>
>You won, you're the first one in my inbox :-)
>
>Ready ?
>
>Steady ?
>
>Start!
OS: 4.5-RC2
Hardware: Intel STL-2 Dual PIII
1 GIG of PC133 SDRAM
PCI ATA-100 Controller
Kernel Configuration (Changes from GENERIC):
Added SMP, APIC
Upped NMBCLUSTERS to 16384
Changed MD_NSECT to 120 (600 MEG)
Commented out unused Etherne
Julian Elischer wrote:
> Actually there have been times when I did want to mmap a datastream..
> I think a datastream mapped into a user buffer-space is one of the
> possible 0-copy methods people sometimes mention.
This is ugly. There are prettier ways of doing it.
-- Terry
To Unsubscribe: se
Julian Elischer wrote:
> You can mmap() devices and you can mmap files..
>
> you cannot mmap FIFOs or sockets.
>
> for this reason I think that devices are still well represented by
> vnodes. If we merged vnodes and vm objects,
> then if devices were not vnodes, how would you represent
> a vm a
A MB with an onboard RTL8100 autonegotiates a 100Mb/s FDX connection ok on a
crossover an a 10/100 switch, but it doesnt detect a 10Mb/s hub at all in
4.4-RELEASE. Is this a known problem? if so, has it been corrected?
DB
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe free
On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:35:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> A MB with an onboard RTL8100 autonegotiates a 100Mb/s FDX connection ok on a
> crossover an a 10/100 switch, but it doesnt detect a 10Mb/s hub at all in
> 4.4-RELEASE. Is this a known problem?
The realtek is known to be a
Hi all!
Apologies if this is common knowledge, but I recently bought Operating
System Concepts by Silberschatz, Galvin and Gagne (published by Wiley)
for my Computer Science course and the book has several appendices which
are available for download from Wiley's web site. One of these
appendi
If memory serves me right, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 06:35:53PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >=20
> > A MB with an onboard RTL8100 autonegotiates a 100Mb/s FDX connection ok o=
> n a=20
> > crossover an a 10/100 switch, but it doesnt detect a 10Mb/s hub at all in=
> =20
:
:Julian Elischer wrote:
:> Actually there have been times when I did want to mmap a datastream..
:> I think a datastream mapped into a user buffer-space is one of the
:> possible 0-copy methods people sometimes mention.
:
:This is ugly. There are prettier ways of doing it.
:
:-- Terry
Con
:
:Julian Elischer wrote:
:> You can mmap() devices and you can mmap files..
:>
:> you cannot mmap FIFOs or sockets.
:>
:> for this reason I think that devices are still well represented by
:> vnodes. If we merged vnodes and vm objects,
:> then if devices were not vnodes, how would you represe
22 matches
Mail list logo
