Title: Telnet option negotiation
Hi FreeBSD experts,
I wrote a VERY simple telnet program that actually works as a Network Virtual Terminal. It is achieved by sending "WON'T XXX" to all "DO XXX" server requests. It should work according to RFC-854, page 4: "Since the NVT is what is left when n
/usr/bin/make already have hooks for remote execution of jobs when
running parallel. All that is missing before we can do distributed
parallel make worlds is that somebody writes the necessary hooks
based on PVM...
This is a really simple task, and the best of it all is that one
does not need a
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:32:04PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/make already have hooks for remote execution of jobs when
> running parallel. All that is missing before we can do distributed
> parallel make worlds is that somebody writes the necessary hooks
> based on PVM...
>
>
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brooks Davis writes:
>On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 12:32:04PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>> /usr/bin/make already have hooks for remote execution of jobs when
>> running parallel. All that is missing before we can do distributed
>> parallel make worlds is that some
The situation with multiple PCs in a classroom is not considered as a classroom by
this author, but a computer lab.
The eInstruction model will provide instructional tools for all levels of classrooms
beginning with level 0. Thus, the model is available to use immediately with no
requiremen
On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 06:01:20PM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Adding PVM to /usr/bin/make is a simple task, less than 1000 lines of
> code.
>
> What you suggest is not going to happen in any of the next couple of
> years unless $BIGCORP pays somebody to do it.
I doubt it's nearly as compl
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Brooks Davis writes:
>> What you suggest is not going to happen in any of the next couple of
>> years unless $BIGCORP pays somebody to do it.
>
>I doubt it's nearly as complicated as you claim. All you have to do is
>tell the system to envoke a set of jobs which i
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> Try creating an entry that matches your card:
>
> card "CL ATA FLASH CARD LEXAR " "TIDALWV"
> config "ata" 0x1 ?
Warner,
I added the pccard.conf entry:
card "CL ATA FLASH CARD LEXAR " "TIDALWV"
config 0x1 "ata" ?
That did the trick. Thank
Word on the street is that Julian Elischer said:
> > My confusion is around splitting/concatenating -
> >
> > When splitting an mbuf chain, the two resultant chains must be as above
> > (heads have M_PKTHDR and mbuf.m_pkthdr.len set) right?
>
> That depends on why yuo need to split them.
>
OK,
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Skye Poier wrote:
> Word on the street is that Julian Elischer said:
> > > My confusion is around splitting/concatenating -
> > >
> > > When splitting an mbuf chain, the two resultant chains must be as above
> > > (heads have M_PKTHDR and mbuf.m_pkthdr.len set) right?
> >
"Lajos Zaccomer (ETH)" wrote:
>
>Part 1.1Type: Plain Text (text/plain)
Don't send HTML to the list.
The problem is likely that you have not fully understood option
negotiation. The negotiation is do/don't/will/won't.
See the RFCs, in particular, RFC855. Also, type "telnet" into
the searc
Hi all,
I'm looking at implementing some extra security checks for all dying and
newly spawned processes. It looks to me like the function that must be
called for all process deaths is exit1() in kern_exit.c, and that new
processes must be spawned by either execve() in kern_exec.c or fork1()
in
I found it interesting. I have 3 idle boxes out here and
friend of mine has ~20, and parallel make is a dream.
Don't know about someone else, I'm giving your proposal
a try.. :-)
On Mon, 21 Jan 2002, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> /usr/bin/make already have hooks for remote execution of jobs wh
I think someone has done that before.
Search for lmake, or pmake.
Rayson
--- diman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I found it interesting. I have 3 idle boxes out here and
> friend of mine has ~20, and parallel make is a dream.
> Don't know about someone else, I'm giving your proposal
> a tr
Hi Diman,
This is the email I sent to another fella who was also interested,
you should get in touch with him so you don't duplicate too much
work.
See also my comments about how to do it.
] To: Hiten Pandya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
] Subject: Re: Project idea: Put PVM in /usr/bin/make
] In-Reply-
I don't think it has been done with the berkeley make that we use,
I have only found gnumake based ones.
Poul-Henning
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Rayson Ho writ
es:
>I think someone has done that before.
>
>Search for lmake, or pmake.
>
>Rayson
>
>--- diman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 07:20:06AM +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
> I don't think it has been done with the berkeley make that we use,
> I have only found gnumake based ones.
Checkout pmake sometime which is a relatively close derivative of
FreeBSD's make(1).
/usr/ports/devel/pmake
17 matches
Mail list logo
