It seems Kristian K. Nielsen wrote:
> Hey Søren,
>
> Do you have any idea what to do with the problems I am experiencing with the
> Intel-series chipset?
Uhm, what Intel chipset exactly, or is it a VIA chipset for Intel you mean ?
Throw me a pciconf -l and I'll check..
-Søren
To Unsubscribe:
:Here's what pstack does:
:
: pstackPrint a hex+symbolic stack trace for each lwp in
: each process.
:
:Solaris truss(1) has this:
:
: -lIncludes the id of the responsible lightweight
: process (LWP) with each line of trace output. If
:
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 12:29:56AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> I dunno about pstack. What does it do? Dump stack backtraces for
> the threads? libc_r does use a fairly well-defined thread stack
> arrangement. It should be possible to write a program (or a gdb
> script) to t
Title: Investors
Investment Special Tonight's Feature CompanyShareCom, Inc. (OTCBB: SHCC) Current Price: $0.0154 52 Week High: $2.49 52 Week Low: $0.009 Why SHCC? SHCC has established business relationships with FEMA, the American Red Cross, AAA, NOAA, and more SHCC is currently booking
Jos Backus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> - Forwarded message from Justin Erenkrantz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> +1. =) I've talked to the FreeBSD people and they just laugh
> maniacally when I ask for a truss that follows children. AIUI,
> NetBSD has this, so it is possible to port these
Hello!
> On Wed, Dec 26, 2001 at 02:46:34PM +0700, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
>> > On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 07:10:09PM +0700, Igor M Podlesny wrote:
>> >> well, not all the same, but partly. Take a look:
>> > Yes. We know.
>> Well. It doesn't surprise me.
>> P.S. Is it a `feature'? ;)
>> P.P.S. Talk
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 06:28:56PM +1030, Greg Lehey wrote:
> On Monday, 10 December 2001 at 22:45:22 -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > Hiten Pandya wrote:
> >> i wanted to ask if there were any _plans_ to port
> >> JFS (Journaled File System) to FreeBSD...
> >
> > Not unless you have plans. When I
Please point me in right direction.
'elm' in FBSD 4.3, 4.4-REL worked for non root.
Now, elm sometimes fails on 4.4-STABLE, for non-root
it fails using the OLD sendmail.cf, and the new one generated by make world.
/usr/sbin/sendmail is link to /usr/sbin/mailwrapper
ls -l /etc/mail/mailer.conf look
I'd like to create a /boot.config switch that will have boot1 _not_ read from
the console; this is for a secure setup. Would others be interested in these
patches when I finish them?
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Director
Noop, just verified it again
on FBSD 4.4 STABLE, this:
int
process_alive(pid)
pid_t pid;
{
while (waitpid(pid, NULL, WNOHANG) < 0 && errno == EINTR)
/* do nothing */;
return kill(pid, 0) == 0;
}
misses a bunch of closed? deleted? usd up pids?
on my client, it stays in 'SMB use SID
On 03-Jan-02 David E. Cross wrote:
> I'd like to create a /boot.config switch that will have boot1 _not_ read from
> the console; this is for a secure setup. Would others be interested in these
> patches when I finish them?
Yes. I've seen other places use this, and I would commit it. :)
--
> On 03-Jan-02 David E. Cross wrote:
> > I'd like to create a /boot.config switch that will have boot1 _not_ read
from
> > the console; this is for a secure setup. Would others be interested in
these
> > patches when I finish them?
>
> Yes. I've seen other places use this, and I would commit it.
Matthew Dillon wrote:
>
> :
> :No switching infrastructure. It's a 10mb/s half duplex ethernet
> :network, with two hubs between the two machines.
> :
> :Joe
>
> I think there may be a problem with your hub setup (e.g. exceeding the
> hub count or end-to-end length limitations) that is
Well, I can do the commit, I am just looking for interest, and code reviewers
;)
--
David Cross | email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Lab Director | Rm: 308 Lally Hall
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, | Ph: 518.276.2860
Departm
On 04-Jan-02 David E. Cross wrote:
> Well, I can do the commit, I am just looking for interest, and code reviewers
> ;)
Oh, right, I'll review. :)
--
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsub
On 04-Jan-02 Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>> On 03-Jan-02 David E. Cross wrote:
>> > I'd like to create a /boot.config switch that will have boot1 _not_ read
> from
>> > the console; this is for a secure setup. Would others be interested in
> these
>> > patches when I finish them?
>>
>> Yes. I've se
On Thu, 3 Jan 2002, John Baldwin wrote:
> Errr, why do you have to hit enter? If this patch does what I think it does,
> you won't even get a boot: prompt at all, it will just jump straight into the
> loader (or kernel). Besides, it wouldn't be on by default. You would have to
> explicitly tu
Not to mention that SIGVTALRM is already used by
the thread library (although I would hope that
_thread_sys_sigaction is smart enough to handle
that case). I've stepped through the GDB
code on both 4.18 and 5.1. On 5.1 I found the
following in i386fbsd-nat.c:
void
child_resume (ptid_t ptid, int
18 matches
Mail list logo
