Re: Another filesystem test program

2001-12-22 Thread Kris Kennaway
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 09:22:22AM -0500, Peter Dufault wrote: > > I'll throw it in there tomorrow. > > > > -Matt > > > > We ought to add a standard way of running the tests expected to pass, > maybe a script in the subdirs "./regress pass" that runs the

patch for sb live record channel dead

2001-12-22 Thread yorickhardy
This patch should fix the pcm0 recording channel dead error for the sb live. This is my first patch, so I hope it applies correctly. The patch is against stable, I do not believe it will work for current but I might be able to fix this also if the problem is present in current. (the patch can be

patch for sb live rear output

2001-12-22 Thread yorickhardy
This patch should enable the rear output (not digital to my knowledge) for the sb live, the volume can be set using the pcm2 setting from the mixer. I hope the patch applies correctly. It should work when applied with /usr/src as the current directory. Yorick Hardy. *** sys/dev/sound/pci/emu10

Re: patch for sb live record channel dead

2001-12-22 Thread cameron grant
> This patch should fix the pcm0 recording channel dead error for the > sb live. This is my first patch, so I hope it applies correctly. > The patch is against stable, I do not believe it will work for current > but I might be able to fix this also if the problem is present in > current. sigh, i

Re: patch for sb live rear output

2001-12-22 Thread cameron grant
> This patch should enable the rear output (not digital to my knowledge) for > the sb live, the volume can be set using the pcm2 setting from the mixer. thanks for the patch. i have a more general extensible mixer design in the works which will go into -current soon. once that's done, various d

[no subject]

2001-12-22 Thread yorickhardy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: patch for sb live record channel dead In-Reply-To: <053501c18ada$11efb3f0$4004020a@haveblue> My apologies, I noticed others having this problem (on the mailing list) and when there was no response I thought I should have a go. My apologies again for the inconvenien

Re: IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-22 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:24:48AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > Neither RFC 791 nor RFC 1122 nor RFC 1812 specify the following: > > if a source-routed IP packet reachs the end of its route, but its > > destination address doesn't match a current host/router, whether > > the packet should

Re: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router

2001-12-22 Thread Yar Tikhiy
On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:54:50PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > On 19:49+0300, Dec 19, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > As for source routing, I believe a stealthy router should just drop > > such packets as though it were a host. Of course, source-routed > > packets destined for the router itse

Re: Installing FreeBSD on a 20Gb disc on a laptop with old BIOS

2001-12-22 Thread Adrian Penisoara
Hi, I'm not sure wether I've had this problem, but to me it seems that the right solution is: * let the IBM DM make that FAT partition, because that's what helps fdisk recognize the correct disk geometry (see the docs) * in the sysinstall delete that FAT partition and make one small s

Re: how to mirror gnats db?

2001-12-22 Thread Nik Clayton
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 04:54:43AM -0800, Hiten Pandya wrote: > I wanted to ask, how I could mirror the gnats database > to my own system. I have cvsup. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/committers-guide/gnats.html N -- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.f

Re: IP options (was: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router)

2001-12-22 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hi, Yar, On 19:12+0300, Dec 21, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Thu, Dec 20, 2001 at 01:24:48AM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > > > > Neither RFC 791 nor RFC 1122 nor RFC 1812 specify the following: > > > if a source-routed IP packet reachs the end of its route, but its > > > destination address

The care and feeding of Vnodes?

2001-12-22 Thread Lamont Granquist
So, yesterday I was playing around with the VFS code and trying to figure out how to get a 'stub' of a filesystem that I could mount and unmount. To do so I need to implement vfs_root() which requires returning a vnode for the root of the filesystem. So, I just called getnewvnode(), passing it s

Re: The care and feeding of Vnodes?

2001-12-22 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011222 16:06] wrote: > > So, yesterday I was playing around with the VFS code and trying to figure > out how to get a 'stub' of a filesystem that I could mount and unmount. > To do so I need to implement vfs_root() which requires returning a vnode > for the

Re: The care and feeding of Vnodes?

2001-12-22 Thread Lamont Granquist
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011222 16:06] wrote: > > So, yesterday I was playing around with the VFS code and trying to figure > > out how to get a 'stub' of a filesystem that I could mount and unmount. > > To do so I need to implement v

Re: Repost - f_type value in statfs structure

2001-12-22 Thread Wayne Pascoe
Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The issue that I am having is detecting valid filesystems to do > > further checks on. I am only interested in checking local filesystems > > such as UFS. > > Check for the MNT_LOCAL flag in f_flags. > -- code example snipped -- Thanks for that. I've

Re: Repost - f_type value in statfs structure

2001-12-22 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Wayne Pascoe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011222 17:13] wrote: > Chad David <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > The issue that I am having is detecting valid filesystems to do > > > further checks on. I am only interested in checking local filesystems > > > such as UFS. > > > > Check for the MNT_LOCA

Re: Processing IP options reveals IPSTEALH router

2001-12-22 Thread Maxim Konovalov
Hello, On 18:51+0300, Dec 21, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 08:54:50PM +0300, Maxim Konovalov wrote: > > On 19:49+0300, Dec 19, 2001, Yar Tikhiy wrote: > > > > > As for source routing, I believe a stealthy router should just drop > > > such packets as though it were a host.