On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 04:15:39PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2001 at 04:13:09AM -0600, Joesh Juphland wrote:
> >
> > I cannot mount any of the NFS shares that I share from my server due to a
> > problem with mountd and RPC.
> >
> > rc.conf looks like this:
> >
> > network_
Matthew Emmerton wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This weekend I decided to do some assembly hacking on some object-only code
> that I've lost the C source for. Since I haven't coded assembler for at
> least 8 years, and I threw my x86 assembly manuals out when I moved 6 months
> ago, there are a few thi
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 07:08:58PM -0400, Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> In particular, am I interpreting these instructions correctly?
>
> 0x80839fb : movzbl (%edx,%eax,1),%eax
>
>
> Takes %eax + %edx, obtains the byte value in memory at that address,
> zero-extends and places into %eax
>
>
On 27-Oct-01 Matthew Emmerton wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> This weekend I decided to do some assembly hacking on some object-only code
> that I've lost the C source for. Since I haven't coded assembler for at
> least 8 years, and I threw my x86 assembly manuals out when I moved 6 months
> ago, there ar
Garance A Drosihn wrote:
> >Until newsyslog is fixed to not be able to stage a
> >denial of service attack against you, I really, really
> >recommend against its use.
>
> Seems like it would be more user-friendly (to freebsd users
> in general) to fix newsyslog, instead of just telling people
> t
[Posted to freebsd-questions will little result. I figured I'd
give -hackers a try before I give up and copy the output by hand.]
Can anyone suggest a means by which to capture the 'boot -v'
output without using a serial console? I'm stuck without any
serial ports on my notebook.
--
Jon Pari
Hi,
Is there currently a way (sysctl, patch?) to disable dynamic route
addition? We have a few very busy web servers here, and we're running in
to a bug in FreeBSD 4.2 (which is related to a bug in previous versions of
FreeBSD - the one that's fixed by lowering net.inet.ip.rtexpire to 10 from
360
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 02:08:08PM -0500, Jon Parise wrote:
> Can anyone suggest a means by which to capture the 'boot -v'
> output without using a serial console?
dmesg(8), so long as it doesn't overrun the buffer.
-current is also writing boot messages to syslog presumably with the
facility of
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 12:39:34PM -0800, Seth Kingsley wrote:
> > Can anyone suggest a means by which to capture the 'boot -v'
> > output without using a serial console?
>
> dmesg(8), so long as it doesn't overrun the buffer.
>
> -current is also writing boot messages to syslog presumably with
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, David Kirchner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there currently a way (sysctl, patch?) to disable dynamic route
> addition? We have a few very busy web servers here, and we're running in
> to a bug in FreeBSD 4.2 (which is related to a bug in previous versions of
> FreeBSD - the one that
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:47:16AM -0800, David Kirchner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is there currently a way (sysctl, patch?) to disable dynamic route
I asume your "dynamic" routes are simple redirects.
sysctl -w net.inet.icmp.drop_redirect=1
or in /etc/rc.conf:
icmp_drop_redirect="YES"
Or get a better r
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 04:01:00PM -0500, Jon Parise wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 12:39:34PM -0800, Seth Kingsley wrote:
>
> > > Can anyone suggest a means by which to capture the 'boot -v'
> > > output without using a serial console?
> >
> > dmesg(8), so long as it doesn't overrun the buffe
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 09:21:33AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
> Almost. The '2' there is a multiplier on (I think) %eax, so it uses
> 'ebx + 2 * eax + 0xe90' for the memory address. Either that or 'eax +
> 2 * ebx + 0xe90'. Check the gas info page for the AT&T syntax to
> figure out exactly whi
On Sat, Oct 27, 2001 at 12:26:22AM -0400, Mike Barcroft wrote:
> Just to clarify. This is still a POLA violation. If a log file is
> pulled out from underneath syslogd(8), one wouldn't expect it to start
> logging again, even if the file was re-created.
I disagree, if the file was re-created.
Any idea why when I insert a breakpoint I get a
SIGTRAP
and can't continue any further? Is this a bug in the
FreeBSD distribution's gdb? I don't see this behavior
on any other platform that I am using. (Linux/
Solaris/
OSF1)
I am only seeing on this particular application. The
binary is 60MB d
David O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Actually, I find it weird and counter intuitive that syslogd will not
> log to the files in the config file (/etc/syslog.conf) unless they
> already exists. It really feels like we are living with a programming
> bug 25 years later
>
> If I didn't
Mike Silbersack wrote:
> > Also, if this happens again, what additional information could I grab so I
> > or others could (hopefully) successfully find the bug?
>
> Many dynamic route related changes have been made since 4.2, your bug may
> already be fixed. You should invest time in transitioni
David O'Brien wrote:
> Actually, I find it weird and counter intuitive that syslogd will not
> log to the files in the config file (/etc/syslog.conf) unless they
> already exists. It really feels like we are living with a programming
> bug 25 years later
>
> If I didn't want syslogd to log s
Hello!
Really micro patch :-) fixing odd behavior (well, in fact, I deem an
error) of FreeBSD' ip_icmp.c. You might observe this bug doing
traceroute while standing behind a GW's interface with several
IP-addresses (aliases). In this case you always got ICMP.TIMXCEED
(time
On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:40:34PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> By using the rename/create/signal approach, syslogd is
> guaranteed to log new messages to the old file, despite the
> rename, until signalled to close and reopen the file (or a
> new file of another name, if syslog.conf is changed).
Are there any test suite packages available similiar to Visual Test from
Rational? Not necessarily with a GUI, but the ability to build test scripts
to test features of applications written for BSD?
Thanks.
--
Tom Greenwalt (F.O.E.) Trancer Software Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
9099 7th Street NE
* Thomas S. Greenwalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011028 23:04] wrote:
> Are there any test suite packages available similiar to Visual Test from
> Rational? Not necessarily with a GUI, but the ability to build test scripts
> to test features of applications written for BSD?
> Thanks.
There's a tool
DejaGNU is a testsuite around expect and tcl/tk that is more of a test
suite builder.
There's also something called TET from OpenGroup
(http://www.opengroup.org) which some people think
highly of (I'm just now familiarizing myself with
it)
On Sun, 28 Oct 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Thoma
I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
which can call fprintf() without winding up getting into a recursive
loop. The problem is that fprintf() will call memcpy() and around and
around we go.
I can use a global variable to prevent this, but that usage isn't thr
* Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:43] wrote:
>
> I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
> which can call fprintf() without winding up getting into a recursive
> loop. The problem is that fprintf() will call memcpy() and around and
> around we go.
* Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:53] wrote:
> * Lamont Granquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [011029 00:43] wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to figure out the best way to write a wrapper around memcpy()
> > which can call fprintf() without winding up getting into a recursive
> > loop. The prob
"David O'Brien" wrote:
| On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 07:40:34PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
| > By using the rename/create/signal approach, syslogd is
| > guaranteed to log new messages to the old file, despite the
| > rename, until signalled to close and reopen the file (or a
| > new file of another
27 matches
Mail list logo
