When I try logging in as anyone other than root I get a "Cannot find root
directory" message and can't log in as that user. The only changes I made
were running make-localhost and adding a domain. Any help is appreciated.
Dan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe fre
Here is my situation. My house can't get DSL or cable. Our neighbors who
live 20-30 feet away do have DSL and have agreed to share the connection. To
make a long story short we have successfully set up a wireless LAN for the
two houses, we've been using a windows laptop to test the connection. I
w
* Dan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010818 03:09] wrote:
> Here is my situation. My house can't get DSL or cable. Our neighbors who
> live 20-30 feet away do have DSL and have agreed to share the connection. To
> make a long story short we have successfully set up a wireless LAN for the
> two houses, w
Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 09:09:32, zaunere (Hans Zaunere) wrote about "Signal Handling":
> In a program that I am working on, I've decided to
> catch signal 15, which then calls execl() in the
> handler to reload the program from the on-disk binary.
> I am able to send it the signal, it reloads, a
Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 17:57:44, zaunere (Hans Zaunere) wrote about "Re: ncurses":
> *Whaps himself* Why didn't I think of that. However
> the question still lingers, is there anyway to output
> to stdout? Its kind of a moot point I suppose, just
> curious.
ncurses already outputs to stdout.
Wed, Aug 15, 2001 at 16:21:32, oli (Olafur Osvaldsson) wrote about "ssh and setuid":
[...]
> As the ssh in FreeBSD is by default not setuid it uses a higher than privileged
> port for connecting so obviously that is the reason for my troubles.
>
> Wouldn't it be better to only disable rhosts_
hope this is an ok place to post this.
as far as i can tell there are three ways to share memory between processes -
using mmap, ipc shared mem or skip it using threads instead.
is this right?
basically i have a server process accepting many connections & i was using
threads, however, it doesn'
Mon, Aug 13, 2001 at 21:48:18, bicknell (Leo Bicknell) wrote about "Very odd tty
hanging problem.":
> >From another window, try to kill the processes as a user, no effect
> with -9 or regular. Try to kill them as root, no effect normal. Kill
> them -9 as root, and all but the first shell wil
I just got through diagnosing some problems Mohan Kokal has been
having with not being able to specify a large enough NMBCLUSTERS
on large-memory (2G) machine. The symptoms were that he was able
to specify 65536 clusters on a 1G machine, but the same parameter
panic'd a 2G mac
All those mentionned in the release notes work..
aeronet, lucent-orinoco (wavelan) are two examples.
You don't say what you used in the laptop..
Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> * Dan Cox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010818 03:09] wrote:
> > Here is my situation. My house can't get DSL or cable. Our neigh
> The memory is not freed until you unmount (and then, the memory is
> only free'd for use by other cfs mounts -- the process size does not, of
> course, shrink).
It doesn't? Does it just use malloc for these structs? When you say "of
course", you kinda imply you're thinking of the "bad o
>There are two things I would like to commit for the release:
>
> - I would like to cap the SWAPMETA zone reservation to 70MB,
> which allows us to manage a maximum of 29GB worth of swapped
> out data.
>
> This is plenty and saves us 94MB of KVM which is roughly
>
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 08:49:55AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> - I would like to cap the SWAPMETA zone reservation to 70MB,
> which allows us to manage a maximum of 29GB worth of swapped
> out data.
Not to introduce machine dependancy, but on Intel max ram is 4GB,
so it seem
Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 08:49:55AM -0700, Matt Dillon wrote:
> > - I would like to cap the SWAPMETA zone reservation to 70MB,
> > which allows us to manage a maximum of 29GB worth of swapped
> > out data.
>
> Not to introduce machine dependancy, but on Intel
On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 06:34:43PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> No. I have a machine with 6GB in it waiting for finishing the PAE
> tweaks.
>
> Intel ppro, pentium2 and pentium3 has a maximum RAM of 64GB. Pentium4 may
> have more but I have not checked.
It was my understanding from a previous thr
On Sat, 18 Aug 2001, Leo Bicknell wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2001 at 06:34:43PM -0700, Peter Wemm wrote:
> > No. I have a machine with 6GB in it waiting for finishing the PAE
> > tweaks.
> >
> > Intel ppro, pentium2 and pentium3 has a maximum RAM of 64GB. Pentium4 may
> > have more but I have not c
16 matches
Mail list logo
