I'm using FreeBSD 4.3,
I have seen there is no /usr/libexec/aout/objdump, there is only
/usr/libexec/elf/objdump
why ?
is it possible to objdump aout binaries ?
thanks,
Amir.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
>
> Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
> module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried calling
> cam_sim_free() and xpt_bus_deregister() but when the module is reloaded, the
> cam
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:54:29PM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
| On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
| >
| > Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
| > module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tried calling
| > cam_sim_
>RTFS ;))
"s" man resolv.conf talks about options, but not timeout or retry
>You may use MTA config. E.g. sendmail does control these options with config:
I use only postfix
>If you use another MTA, you can port sendmail's way to implement these
>options: it changes internal resolver data.
I
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> > According to the red daemon book, alias vnodes are used to make cache
> > coherent (vp as a key). But getblk() stuff does not seem to check it.
> > This makes me feel the code is there for historical reasons.
>
> The "BSD 4.4
But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at 06:39:09PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
> >
> > Here is the code for a scsi removable media drive. If this is to become a
> > module, the cam/scsi attachment must be removed. I have tri
Isn't this what 'camcontrol rescan' is for?
G'luck,
Peter
--
This sentence contains exactly threee erors.
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
>
> On Sat, 23 Jun 2001, Peter Pentchev wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2001 at
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
|
| But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
So the question is then, how can i get it to do that?
Jonathon
--
Microsoft complaining about the source license used by
Linux is like the event horizon calling the kettle black.
To Un
> make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
> any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
> another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
The "make buildkernel" approach sucks for incremental
builds, since you are unable to avoid the "config" run
each time, and a lot
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 08:09:46PM +0100, j mckitrick wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 10:38:53AM -0700, Matthew Jacob wrote:
> |
> | But the unit numbers can and do recycle.
>
> So the question is then, how can i get it to do that?
If 'camcontrol rescan' would do what you want, then look at ho
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:23:35PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> > make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
> > any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
> > another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
>
> The "make buildkernel" approach sucks for incremental
> b
Zhihui Zhang wrote:
> I think you got me wrong. I was talking about a device
> with more than one names. So we can have more than one
> vnode for the same device. (If there is more than one name
> to the same device in the same FS, they can share the vnode,
> otherwise, they cannot.)
This is not
Peter Pentchev wrote:
> Terry, this is simply not true. Even in -stable, config(8)
> is smart enough to try reading the opt_*.h files, and not
> change them if they already contain the values it is about
> to write there.
Rerunning config and make depend always result in more
things being recomp
On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 02:03:53PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Peter Pentchev wrote:
> > Terry, this is simply not true. Even in -stable, config(8)
> > is smart enough to try reading the opt_*.h files, and not
> > change them if they already contain the values it is about
> > to write there.
>
On 23-Jun-01 Peter Pentchev wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:23:35PM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
>> > make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
>> > any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
>> > another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
>>
>> The "make buil
[ peter@ cc'd because he's done a lot of work with config(8) ]
John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On 22-Jun-01 Dima Dorfman wrote:
> > John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >> 1) Split sys/i386/conf/NOTES up into MI and MD parts. The MI portion would
> >>become sys/conf/NOTES an
Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 12:23:35, tlambert2 (Terry Lambert) wrote about "Re: Two Junior
Kernel Hacker tasks..":
> > make buildkernel is rather easy way to work it around: in
> > any case object tree is machine-dependent, and one yet
> > another directory does not destroy anything. ;|
> The "make
Sat, Jun 23, 2001 at 19:01:42, LConrad (Len Conrad) wrote about "resolv.conf
options":
> >RTFS ;))
> "s" man resolv.conf talks about options, but not timeout or retry
"S" means source.
For FreeBSD standard resolver, source of /etc/resolv.conf reading
is in src/lib/libc/net/res_init.c.
But yo
18 matches
Mail list logo
