Re: multilingual boot.flp for 4.3-RELEASE

2001-05-07 Thread Tatsumi Hosokawa
eBSD-jp/I18N-flp/4.3-RELEASE/20010507/ > p.s. one question - should I translate LOCALIZE.TXT? It exists only in > the form of English. You don't have to translate it, but of course, if you translate it to Korean, I will put it at texts/ko/. > And please add my name to LOCALIZE.TXT

sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Sheldon Hearn
Hi folks, Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for opaque MIB entries named as arguments? I'm specifically interested in kern.proc.all. I can ``sysctl -A | grep kern.proc.all'', but it's weird that neither of these two do anything useful: sysctl -A kern.proc

Re: Getting peer credentials on a unix domain socket

2001-05-07 Thread Mike Silbersack
On 7 May 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > The silly part of it is that the socket's initial credentials > > might be different than the holder's credentials. > > That's a feature, just like you can open /dev/io as root, then drop > root privs an

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for > opaque MIB entries named as arguments? Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't pri

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't > print a message when it omits printing an opaque variable. Do you think it'd be okay to a

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Dag-Erling Smorgrav <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Is there a good reason why sysctl(8) won't display _any_ output for > > opaque MIB entries named as arguments? > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > option to make it

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > > option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't > > print a message when it omits printing an o

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:24:39PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > > > option to make it display just one variab

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > >On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > >> Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an >> option to make it display just one variable in hex, and why it doesn't >> print a message when it omits

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:43:39PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > > > > >On 07 May 2001 18:51:22 +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > > >> Yes it will, with -X. The interesting question is why there isn't an > >> option to make it disp

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? > At least on ref5 as of this very moment.. Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] To Unsubscribe: send mail to

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Peter Pentchev
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? > > At least on ref5 as of this very moment.. > > Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored.

Re: sysctl(8) and opaque MIB entries

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 07:52:15PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > > Peter Pentchev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > How about e.g. 'sysctl -a hw', which still shows *all* MIB's? > > Yes, because '-a' means 'show all non-opaque' and 'hw' is ignored

Re: Q: porting a driver from linux to freebsd.

2001-05-07 Thread Julian Elischer
Robert Suetterlin wrote: > > Hello! > > I asked this already on freebsd-questions and was suggested to ask on this list, too. > > I have a linux driver for a video grabber card (dfg/bw1 from 'the imaging >source'). This card does not use a well bt848 or similar chip. I would like to

Re: no keyboard

2001-05-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 05-May-01 Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Ceri Storey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010505 11:59] wrote: >> On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 08:54:18PM +0200, Ingo Flaschberger wrote: >> > > Note : this is a way to kill your keyboard : an AT keyboard is not >> > > hot-plug compatible >> > >> > i have never killed

(no subject)

2001-05-07 Thread Francois Zellinger
subscribe To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need to be able to set my TCP/IP window size to 512KB (or perhaps more). I have tried doing this with sysctl: root@sebulba:p0 /root> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.recvspace=524288 net.inet.tcp.recvspace: 131072 -> 524288 root@sebulba:p

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need > to be able to set my TCP/IP window size to 512KB (or perhaps more). I > have tried doing this with sysctl: > > root@sebulba:p0 /root> sysctl -w net.inet.tcp.r

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread Valentin Nechayev
Sun, May 06, 2001 at 17:14:08, rakshe (Rohit Rakshe) wrote about "Re: FPU exception, kernel panic": (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) There were some reports in current@ about incorrect usage of i586_bzero() which uses FPU for zero-filling. It generated random ker

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 08:32:06AM +0300, Valentin Nechayev wrote: > Sun, May 06, 2001 at 17:14:08, rakshe (Rohit Rakshe) wrote about "Re: FPU >exception, kernel panic": > > (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) > There were some reports in current@ about incorrect us

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread David Malone
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:20:05PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > root@sebulba:p0 /root> ftp 192.168.1.2 > ftp: socket: No buffer space available One possibility is that your process limits for sbsize are too low. You could check what it says in login.conf. (I note that our tcsh doesn't support sbs

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 10:52:47PM +0100, David Malone wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:20:05PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > root@sebulba:p0 /root> ftp 192.168.1.2 > > ftp: socket: No buffer space available > > One possibility is that your process limits for sbsize are > too low. You could ch

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > I am working on a FreeBSD device driver for my Co's GSN adapter and need > > > to be able to

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Kenneth D. Merry
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 17:15:20 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16:20:05 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > > > I am working on a FreeBS

Re: Realy LARGE TCP/IP Window Size?

2001-05-07 Thread Bob Willcox
On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:17:53PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 17:15:20 -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 04:45:31PM -0500, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 03:38:02PM -0600, Kenneth D. Merry wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 07, 2001 at 16

bridging on specific devices

2001-05-07 Thread Marco Wertejuk
Hello, I'm using 4.2 release and i need bridging. Luigi tells in the manpage that the option to select specific devices for bridging is still in development. Does anybody know how far this work is done in 4.3 stable ? I need this feature very urgently, and all of my experiments with net.link.et

Re: FPU exception, kernel panic

2001-05-07 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Valentin Nechayev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > (I cannot even guarantree 50% this is the same problem, but...) > There were some reports in current@ about incorrect usage of i586_bzero() > which uses FPU for zero-filling. It generated random kernel panics mainly > on K6-2, also on P5-MMX and simi

Re: bridging on specific devices

2001-05-07 Thread Luigi Rizzo
> Hello, > > I'm using 4.2 release and i need bridging. > Luigi tells in the manpage that the option > to select specific devices for bridging is > still in development. > > Does anybody know how far this work is done > in 4.3 stable ? it works on 4.3-RELEASE cheers luigi > I

Question about building source

2001-05-07 Thread Dave Hayes
Am I correct in assuming that: $ cd /usr/src $ make installworld DESTDIR=/vol1/FreeBSD will install the entire OS into /vol1/FreeBSD? Has anyone ever tried this? ;) -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< "

Re: Displaying options for current NFS mounts

2001-05-07 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
What happened to this patch/this discussion? To remind everyone, the issue was to print specific file-system specific mount options as in dima@spike% /sbin/mount -vt nfs pid295@spike:/host on /host (nfs, v2, udp, hard, intr) pid295@spike:/st on /st (nfs, v2, udp, hard, intr) instead of ju

picoBSD

2001-05-07 Thread Trimarchi Michael
Where is the picoBSD source code ? Can i compile for ARM processor ? Best Regards Michael Trimarchi To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message

Re: Question about building source

2001-05-07 Thread Makoto MATSUSHITA
dave> $ cd /usr/src dave> $ make installworld DESTDIR=/vol1/FreeBSD dave> will install the entire OS into /vol1/FreeBSD? Yes (or it should be). dave> Has anyone ever tried this? ;) You should have already seen the result that uses "make installworld DESTDIR=/what/ever" -- FreeBSD distribution