I'd say it would be an excellent example of how to use portals if
nothing else, given that almost nobody understands them. :)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Hi
A thing to keep in mind about the portal file system is that it
designed to provide a means of getting a file handle to an object that
could be obtained by a call to open(2). It does not then provide
a means of reading/writing etc. to that object.
If you take a look at the example portal.conf
On Wed, Mar 14, 2001 at 11:39:16PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote:
> The other hack I'm trying to get rid of is in the Makefile:
>
> post-patch:
> @ ${CP} ${WRKSRC}/configure ${WRKSRC}/configure.Patched
> @ ${SED} -e 's#-lpthread#-pthread#g' \
> ${WRKSRC}/configure.Patch
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 10:38:21AM -, Duncan Barclay wrote:
> Hi
>
> A thing to keep in mind about the portal file system is that it
> designed to provide a means of getting a file handle to an object that
> could be obtained by a call to open(2). It does not then provide
> a means of reading
Hi,
I've been following this thread with great interest (many thanks to Matt!),
and it reminded me of some rumours of a book being written by Kirk McKusick
and some other people on the design of FreeBSD OS. Hopefully this book will
cover the subject of VM in great detail. Does anybody know if the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
I'm reading kernel source,but I don't understand something like this ->
example:
#define GG(x,y) \
static void * const blabla_##x_blabla_##y = &y;
As I see this should make something like this
GG(foo,bar) should make
static void * const blabla_foo_blabla_ba
Hi-
I have some questions about multi-processing
and FreeBSD. If I am using the wrong list(s)
to ask this, please let me know. All these
questions pertain to the x86 variant of FreeBSD.
I am interested in booting and running FreeBSD
on a two-processor Tyan motherboard. I would
like to know t
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:25:13AM -0800, Dorr H. Clark wrote:
>
> Hi-
>
> I have some questions about multi-processing
> and FreeBSD. If I am using the wrong list(s)
> to ask this, please let me know. All these
> questions pertain to the x86 variant of FreeBSD.
>
> I am interested in booting
LES AVANTAGES D'ANNONCER VOS OFFRES D'EMPLOIS SUR GO4JOB.NET
NOS TARIFS :
FORFAIT D'ESSAIS : 199.95 $ pour 15 jours, maximum 100 cv
(plusieurs autres forfaits disponibles)
3,000,000 de pages visitées en cinq mois
3,500 candidats disponibles en ligne
900 emplois de disponibles
650 entrepr
milunovic wrote:
>
> I'm reading kernel source,but I don't understand something like this ->
>
> example:
> #define GG(x,y) \
> static void * const blabla_##x_blabla_##y = &y;
>
> As I see this should make something like this
>
> GG(foo,bar) should make
> static void * const blabla_foo_blabl
Hi
I've been writing a driver for the S3 Sonicvibes audio card. The card
is PCI, but has 7 io ports. The PCI initialization stops after 5
ports have been mapped out (constants are hardcoded in sys/pci so
reasonable to assume this fits with PCI spec). The netbsd version of
this driver uses bus
Thus spake Jerry Toung ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Does anyone of you know about a book that would deal specifically
> with FreeBSD device drivers dev.?
> If yes let me know.
Not books, but there are some tutorials/manpages available.
See:
http://www.FreeBSD.org/tutorials/
and section 9 of the manual
Aloha!
Peter Jeremy wrote:
> For a totally different approach, try Cordic algorithms. Cordic
> algorithms let you implement circular and hyperbolic functions
> (including exponential, log and sqrt) using add, subtract, shift and
> table lookup. (An n-bit result needs an n-entry x n-bit table, 2
Some body just told me that williams Paul from Columbia University (Bill
Paul @ Freebsd.org) has written that
kind of book. But I can't get his exact email address at FreeBSD.org to
ask him the reference.
Alexander Langer wrote:
> Thus spake Jerry Toung ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > Does anyone of
To Whom It May Concern:
I am writing this letter to volunteer my time to the following areas of the
freeBSD project
Implement Int13 vm86 disk driver.
Port existing ISA drivers to new architecture.
Move all interrupt-management code to appropriate parts of the bus drivers.
Port PCI subsystem
When using 4.3-BETA cvsupped 23/mar and
config'ed
options NETGRAPH
and added the sr and sppp drivers for the frame relay
link we are establishing.
Dmesg gives me this line
src0: dirver is using old-style compatibility shims
What are these shims?
mjt
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
The recommended work for any new developper of FreeBSD (did I say
welcome ?) is to search in the PR (problem reports) database on the
FreeBSD web site, to take one problem and then give a solution
(generally as a patch to the sources of the OS)
when you are done, find some committer of FreeBSD an
I get the following messages when I fire up ngctl
module_register: module netgraph already exists
and
linker_file_sysinit: "netgraph.ko" failed to register 17
I am using 4.3-BETA as at 13/mar
and have options NETGRAPH in my kernel config
I am using the ngctl command to configure a frame rela
It means that they havent converted the driver to the new "bus" format and
are still using 3.x driver types.
At 06:09 PM 03/15/2001, you wrote:
>When using 4.3-BETA cvsupped 23/mar and
>config'ed
>
>options NETGRAPH
>
>and added the sr and sppp drivers for the frame relay
>link we are establishi
ðÒÉ×ÅÔ!
ðÉÛÅÔ ÷ÁÍ ÒÏÂÏÔ, ÏÔ×ÅÞÁÀÝÉÊ ÚÁ ÒÁÓÓÙÌËÕ Ó ÓÁÊÔÁ: http://oballet.da.ru
úÅÒËÁÌÁ: http://oballet.i-am.ru
http://oballet.plex.ru
http://www.sinor.ru/~oballet
÷ÁÛ E-mail ÁÄÒÅÓ ËÅÍ-ÔÏ ÐÏÄÐÉÓÁÎ ÎÁ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÏÎÎÕÀ ÒÁÓÓÙÌËÕ ÎÁÛÅÇÏ ÓÁÊÔÁ!
íÙ ÎÅ ÉÍÅÅÍ ÐÒÁ×Á ×ÙÓÙÌÁÔØ ÷ÁÍ ÎÁÛ
Just to be sure I have it right. When the kernel diverts the packet to
natd, via ipfw:
1) kernel sends packet to natd
2) natd read() the packet
3) natd screws with it (changes dest addr,etc)
4) natd write() the packet
5) kernel reinjects the packet back into the firewall
That's what I could ge
David Xu wrote:
>
>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
> because pthread does not work with kqueue at present.
>
> --
> Best regards,
> David Xu
KSE is not into coding yet.
we have a basic design an
Hello Julian,
Friday, March 16, 2001, 12:18:15 PM, you wrote:
JE> David Xu wrote:
>>
>>I wonder status of KSE, I am dreaming rewrite our application
>> server using kqueue+pthread(KSE), current, we use poll()+pthread
>> because pthread does not work with kqueue at present.
>>
>> --
>> Best
Murray Taylor wrote:
>
> When using 4.3-BETA cvsupped 23/mar and
> config'ed
>
> options NETGRAPH
>
> and added the sr and sppp drivers for the frame relay
> link we are establishing.
>
> Dmesg gives me this line
>
> src0: dirver is using old-style compatibility shims
>
> What are these shim
> When using 4.3-BETA cvsupped 23/mar and
> config'ed
>
> options NETGRAPH
>
> and added the sr and sppp drivers for the frame relay
> link we are establishing.
>
> Dmesg gives me this line
>
> src0: dirver is using old-style compatibility shims
>
>
> What are these shims?
It is just the
On Fri, Mar 16, 2001 at 11:39:10AM +1100, Murray Taylor wrote:
> I get the following messages when I fire up ngctl
>
> module_register: module netgraph already exists
> linker_file_sysinit: "netgraph.ko" failed to register 17
>
> I am using 4.3-BETA as at 13/mar
> and have options NETGRAPH in my
[Redirected to -net]
On Thu, Mar 15, 2001 at 09:48:24PM -0600, Nick Rogness wrote:
>
> Just to be sure I have it right. When the kernel diverts the packet to
> natd, via ipfw:
>
> 1) kernel sends packet to natd
> 2) natd read() the packet
> 3) natd screws with it (changes dest addr,etc)
> 4) n
27 matches
Mail list logo
