On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Robert Lipe wrote:
> Gérard Roudier wrote:
>
> > Being smart with kernel interface is important for drivers to be fast and
> > reliable. Puting some stinky layer between native kernel interfaces and
> > drivers looks horrible to me.
>
> Fast and reliable are both covered.
On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 02:26:25AM -0500, Mike Nowlin wrote:
> I messed around with this about a year ago, and now I'm messing around with
> it again.
>
> In a nutshell, I can NOT figure out how to get iic with lpbb working. I
> have tried all sorts of combinations of config file parameters fr
On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Dale Chulhan - Home wrote:
> I have a pal trying to do a tool for measurement of bandwidth on a bsd
> machine.
>
> He says:
>
> Everytime I open a raw socket connection ( send FIN to expect RST or
> something like that ).
There should be no problem with sending a TCP FIN o
Gérard Roudier wrote:
> > A more recognizable reliabilty improvement is the more unified and
> > constitent programming interface. No more "you can't call malloc with
>
> This looks like matter of taste to me. Unless all O/S architects since day
> one until UDI have been incompetent idiots. :-)
I patched some library files and noted that some functions, which parse some
configuration files, use staticaly allocated buffers. Sizes of such
staticaly allocated buffers are 8k, 10k and so on. These buffers are used to
hold one line from parsed file. Usually it is enough for one line, but
reall
Can you further assist me by expanding your reference to help me locate it?
> There should be no problem with sending a TCP FIN on a raw socket.
> But the returning RST will be eaten by the TCP protocol. Your raw
> socket will not receive it. (ref: Stevens UNP v1, p 659)
To Unsubscribe: se
Robert Lipe wrote:
>
> Matthew Jacob wrote:
>
> > I've been giving myself some embarrassing soul searching, and I'm
> > forced to come to the conclusion that I've acted like a complete idiot
> > and jerk.
> >
> > Robert- please accept my sincere apologies for my ill-mannered
> > reaction and wor
this is a 3.5s machine, I cvsuped, made world, and configed/made depend the
kernel and then reboot and I am still getting the same error message. any
ideas?
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
That reference is the network programming BIBLE!
Richard Stevens, "Unix Network Programming Volume 1"
Run, don't walk, to the nearest on-line bookstore and get the whole
series (Vols 1 and 2). You should also get "Advanced Programming in the
Unix Environment".
-A.
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dale Chu
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, Dale Chulhan - Work wrote:
> Can you further assist me by expanding your reference to help me locate it?
>
> > There should be no problem with sending a TCP FIN on a raw socket.
> > But the returning RST will be eaten by the TCP protocol. Your raw
> > socket will not receiv
Hello
I cann't install FreeBSD in a box with main board Mega Trends and
Pentium II. I have tried installing FreeBSD 4.0, but it has an error
when it is finishing the instalation.
sysinstall showed:
MAKEDEV returned non-zero status.
The comit operation completed with errors no updating /etc f
Wasn't it 9-Feb-2001, at 11:17PM, when Kenny Drobnack said:
> As far as syncing a Handspring Visor with FreeBSD - dunno. Tried using
> the coldsync program which was meant for syncing Palm Pilots, and the
> coldsync web page claims that it works with Visors too. When I run
> coldsync, I get a me
Ok to finish this off. dmesg
da0 at sym0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing
Enabled
da0: 8715MB (1785 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T C)
da1 at sym0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0
da1: Fixed Direc
:...
:da2: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
:da2: 40.000MB/s transfers (20.000MHz, offset 15, 16bit), Tagged Queueing
:Enabled
:da2: 8715MB (1785 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T C)
:
:3 drives in there as of 3 min ago.
:just want to take these 3 and raid0 then together as /var.
:what was
On 16 Feb 2001, at 16:34, Dan Phoenix wrote:
> 3 drives in there as of 3 min ago.
> just want to take these 3 and raid0 then together as /var.
> what was recommendation ccd or venim?
>
> and has anyone done this before...could walk me through setting these up
> quickly maybe?
perhaps http://fre
I installed libiconv-1.5.1 on my 4.1.1-release system with the following results:
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 452 Feb 16 09:05 libiconv.la
lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 15 Feb 16 09:05 libiconv.so -> libiconv.so.2.2
-rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 646265 Feb 16 09:05 libiconv.so.2.2
Once finish
Thanks for that urlalong with that and Chris Watson's help :)
was able to get then up running vinum...thanks again.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Dan Langille wrote:
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:58:42 +1300
> From: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: Dan Phoenix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: [EMAIL
vinum_drives="" # put in names of disks containing vinum drives
# to start vinum on only specific disks.
was this taken out in latest release of fbsd?
On Sat, 17 Feb 2001, Dan Langille wrote:
> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 13:58:42 +1300
> From: Dan Langille <[EMAIL PROTECT
sorry if this is not the most appropriate forum to discuss this,
redirects appreciated.
I have spent some time trying to put etherboot[1] code onto the
hard disk so that it can be selected using the FreeBSD boot
manager. I ended up doing it with a small amt of modifications
to the "boot1" code
drive ibm1 device /dev/da0s1e
drive ibm2 device /dev/da1s1e
drive ibm3 device /dev/da2s1e
volume stripe
plex org striped 512s
sd length 8714m drive ibm1
sd length 8714m drive ibm2
sd length 8714m drive ibm3
is this right?
i did an rm -rf on 150megs and it is taking forever on this
20 matches
Mail list logo
